Incompetence+Cowardice+Stonewalling does not = self-righteousness

USA Today runs an op-ed today, accusing House Republicans of partisanship over their Select Committee’s Benghazi hearings, by using it to hammer Hillary Clinton.

But Hillary Clinton and Obama brought this on, by stonewalling investigations.

They have no one to blame but themselves.

Withholding information/communications from hearings have consequences…they should have thought of that before deciding to do so…we’re guessing they did.

BCP thinks Clinton was betting the public would tire of ‘old news’, and get away with it. Obama was betting the GOP would pursue it, and weaken Clinton’s grip on the ‘inevitability cloak’ she would try to don for the 2016 presidential election.

A steady drip-drip of information is only because THEY continue slow-walking info.

Their incompetence and cowardice that directly contributed to four American deaths in Benghazi was hidden by withholding information from the American people…

…and that combination does not justify self-righteous cries of ‘partisanship’ now.

Doubts? Rep. Gowdy succinctly skewers their disingenuous claims, today.

(But, hey, when Clinton or Obama are involved…do we really need convincing?)

ALL of our constitutional rights are just one Justice away from repeal

National Review headline:

“The Second Amendment Is One Supreme Court Justice from Repeal”

The article points out how the Left increasingly uses the judiciary to amend laws, and that Americans are one Supreme Court justice away from losing gun rights.

Guess what…

Americans are one Justice away from losing ANY right the Left doesn’t want them to have – including speech, religion, gun rights, search-&-seizure…you name it.

2016 will be an election that defines the American voter, and proves the point…

…you get what you vote for.

Democrat plans, to give Big Insurance $2.5bn, stopped by GOP

Any doubt that the Democrat Party is in the pocket of big business?

Republican-backed anti-bailout legislation stopped $2.5bn tax$$ from being fed to Big Insurance corporations through Democrat-created Obamacare ‘risk corridors’.

If it weren’t for the media, Democrat ‘champion-of-Little-Guy’ lies would be exposed.

With a catastrophic Obamanomics in full display, Republicans should ask every day why Democrats pat ‘the Little Guy’ on the head in front of campaign-stop cameras…

…while – behind the scenes – shoveling billion$ to the Big Guys.

If ‘transparent’ means seeing right through someone, then sure, Hillary’s transparent

Hillary Clinton claims she’s ‘the most transparent person in American history’.

But talk about a play on words…she wants us to think she’s open and forthcoming?

Anyone notice, she fails to mention her ‘transparency’ is forcedby Federal court?

She’s transparent, alright…

…as sagging poll numbers reveal, most Americans see right through her.

This month, she testifies at a congressional hearing on Benghazi. She labels the hearing a slow-walked ‘political partisan committee’, to destroy her 2016 aspirations.

(Anyone notice, she fails to mention hundreds of suddenly found emails involving the Benghazi time period just last week? So any ‘slow-walking’ was caused by her!)

And she cites a comment made by House Majority Leader McCarthy, that she says is proof the Republicans are using Benghazi as a ‘political hit job’ on her.

But McCarthy was pointing out that Americans DO CARE about finding out the truth on Benghazi, and as more comes out, her dismal poll numbers prove they care.

Hillary can’t be trusted…that was the point…and her stonewalling proves it.

So, Clinton can claim the House Benghazi hearings are a political hit job, but if she had been TRANSPARENT in late 2012 , early 2013, it would all be behind her now.

Playing an evasion game caused the slow drip-drip-drip of discovered information.

The fact she’s taking the hits now is not a result of GOP machinations…

…it’s an awakening public condemnation…of her own making.

Transparent? You bet she’s transparent.

Ever wonder why it’s not the Middle East’s responsibility to cure Middle East ills?

Isn’t it the epitome of arrogance, to think we can cure what they themselves can’t?

As Andrew McCarthy says of the Middle East players: “There are not good guys and bad guys in this equation…there are bad guys, and other bad guys.”

If we can’t tell them apart, what makes us think we can solve their problems?

Just asking.

Anyone taking bets on Oregon comm. college killer ethnicity?

A media silence over any hint of the Oregon killer’s background speaks volumes.

Meanwhile, our hat’s off to the Army veteran who took 7 rounds trying to protect his fellow students during the rampage. Our thoughts and prayers go out to Chris Mintz.

As for the killer? BCP bet’s that he’s linked with Middle East Islamist ideology.

For all the media’s first attempts to portray him as ‘anti-religion’, it just seems highly suspect that only those who identified as Christians were shot in the head.

The final word on his background will be interesting, indeed.

Ssooo…Reuters thinks we should stop a flow of terrorists from LEAVING the U.S.?

Headline: U.S. fails to stop flow of foreign fighters to Islamic State

Does ANYONE in their right mind want these terror supporters to stay here?

Let’s rephrase the question…

Do Americans prefer to kill ISIS supporters on a foreign battle field, or spend their tax dollars on incarcerating them in America…for release at a later date?

Stonewalling…then complaining of slow-walking?

Leftist Richard Cohen takes to the IBD pages to complain of Hillary treatment.

And, of course, uses the Washington Post to do the same.

The entire Obama team, including Hillary, stonewall Congress in its investigation of what happened before, during, and after Benghazi, and yet, delays caused by that stonewalling are seen as Republicans slow-walking a process…to hurt Hillary?

We assure Mr. Cohen that relatives of those killed in Benghazi want answers. He would too, if one of the Americans killed in that attack had been his son, or nephew.

Earth to Richard…how indifferent to their loss can you Liberals be?

You said it yourself, sir…“a terrorist attack in Libya is no laughing matter”

…and we would add ‘…especially when Americans in Hillary’s State Dept are killed, after repeated emails TO HER – begging for more security – are ignored‘.

Just days ago, more hidden Benghazi emails of Hillary’s have surfaced…yet Cohen has the gall to believe it’s ‘Hillary-hatred’ that drives this Benghazi investigation?

Would he believe that, if it had been ‘Tyrone Cohen’ dead on a Benghazi rooftop?

Message to Richard Cohen: you’re no Diogenes.

(And, if you want to see a real ‘laughing matter‘…we suggest using a mirror.)