The incredibly convoluted logic of California sanctuary-secessionist politicians

President Trump has promised to withhold federal funding to sanctuary locales which violate Constitutional imperatives to follow the federal immigration laws.

Got that…sanctuary activities violate the law; and therefore are unconstitutional.

So, one would assume that a sanctuary city like San Francisco would recognize the ludicrous nature of relying ON the Constitution, to fight feds withholding funds.

Nope, not the Left coast. They’re suing to continue receiving federal funds, claiming that denying them the money is…wait for it…UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

This is your California tax dollars at work.

To sum up, in a Leftist world, cities and states violating the Constitution…good.

Our federal government enforcing the Constitution…BAD…

…and San Francisco wants to use the Constitution to stop that enforcement.

Only a Democrat would see using the Constitution…

…to allow violating the Constitution…

…as logical.

How is asking that a law be enforced considered an ‘attack’ on judges?

As usual, the Left is in high dudgeon, after President Trump suggested that the law (and the Constitution) which gives him national security powers be followed.

God forbid.

It’s a strange world we live in, if someone calling for judges to enforce settled law is considered to be attacking judges…instead of just asking them to do their job.

Democrats and Left-wing media attack dogs are willing to misconstrue at will when it comes to painting President Trump as a malevolent force, even ignoring reality.

Their hypocrisy is, as usual, on full display…

(Especially when it’s fact Obama did attack the courts several times, with impunity.)

Uhhh…How many celebrity kids go to public schools?

As the A-list celebrities rant and rave over confirmation of Betsy DeVos as the new Education Secretary, screaming that America’s children are threatened now…

…one can only wonder how many of their kids go to public school?

Betsy DeVos, you see, is a champion of charter schools and school choice.

In case you’ve missed it, that’s a HUGE threat to the teachers’ unions, and a huge reason why the Democrat Party (disproportionate recipients of union donations) will do anything and everything to fight against such champions of free choice.

Nothing enrages a union more than loss of revenue, and DeVos threatens that.

After all, to the unions, it’s about the dollars…not the education.

For those A-list celebrities, we would ask if they were willing to put their kids in the public education system they so rabidly tweet for…

…or is their bluster about ‘protecting’ public education just…bluster?

Ted Cruz NAILS it…the Left’s outrage and protests are aimed at you, the voters

Senator Cruz defined the Left’s real target of all the riots, violent protests, and Democrat political obstruction of every single thing in Congress…

…and who is that target?

YOU. The American voters who elected Mr. Trump in November.

Democrats and their angry Left seem strangely unaware that the very actions of their members are what got that avalanche thundering downhill on election day.

From Hillary’s lawlessness to the Sham-stream media’s fake news to Black-Lives-Matter reckless, dangerous targeting of law enforcement…it all revolted Americans.

Incredibly, those despicable acts seem to be increasing in volume and intensity.

We hope mainstream Americans strengthen their resolve against such behavior.

Which means the Democrat Party may wander lost in the wilderness quite a while.

Use this chance to loudly & clearly invoke the law

The Feb 03 ruling against Pres Trump’s temporary 7-nation ban on immigration gives Republicans an excellent chance to invoke the law that clearly allows it.

Sadly, it seems only the President is doing so.

We suggest congressional Republicans stop cowering under desks, stand with Pres Trump, and use EVERY press opportunity to loudly and clearly explain settled law.

And, explain how the 7 nations targeted DON’T background check or properly vet those immigrants headed to America...if that’s not a good enough reason, what is?

What part of this 65-year old law is not comprehensible?

8 U.S. Code § 1182 – Inadmissible aliens

(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

More importantly, how does a federal judge ignore this VERY plain language?

And, as Deroy Murdock points out, that judge who ruled to stay the President’s ban was wrong about his ‘no-terrorists-from-those-nations’ rationale as well.

“…23% of American Muslims nabbed in radical-Islamic conspiracies since Sept 11, 2001, had family ties to the seven nations included in Trump’s immigration order.”

“…40 individuals who were admitted to the United States as refugees have been convicted for, or implicated in, terrorism or terrorism-related offenses — and the total is likely much higher.”

That judge ignored plain-spoken settled law…and dangerous proven facts.

If the 9th Circuit rules against Mr. Trump’s appeal, EVERY act of terrorism by those who slipped through, from Feb 03 forward, is on the heads of an activist judiciary.

HYPOCRISY…defined

Question: when can’t a father defend his daughter?

Answer: when he’s a Republican President.

Nordstrom has announced that Ivanka Trump’s retail line is being removed. Then, President Trump tweeted disapproval, and that their decision was political.

(C’mon, folks, they were happy enough carrying her line when he was The Donald.)

Of course, the Left’s heads exploded. Cue the faux “that’s not presidential” outrage.

So the Left is fine with attacking a woman because she’s the daughter of Pres Trump…but he can’t defend his daughter because he’s the President. Got that?

Since when are children of a president rendered indefensible by that relationship?

Since when does becoming president remove one’s right to defend their children?

Evidently, only when they’re Republicans.

 

An idea on how to process 7-nation immigration-ban travelers

In halting his immigration ban, it appears some federal judges believe themselves to be better at assessing our Nation’s terror-threat risk than the Commander-in-Chief.

Fine.

Until the matter is resolved (can you say ‘Supreme Court?), process the incoming passengers in question from the designated nations involved…

…and divert them…through Guantanamo International Airport…with a layover.

And since it appears the crazy Left is involved in lawsuits against a temporary travel ban, maybe add a final destination…to one of George Soros’s country estates.

The false equivalence of Christianity and Islam

For those who equate past violence of Christianity with the current violence of Islam and then declare that the teachings of one is no worse than the other, consider…

Christianity teaches Love, with Tolerance and Understanding for the non-believers. Back then, the problem was some Christians DID NOT FOLLOW those teachings…

Islam teaches Submission, with Intolerance and DEATH for non-believers. Today, the problem is some Islamists DO follow those teachings.

Bad Christians did not practice their faith…

…Islamists DO…

…and that’s the problem.

The quintessential businessman at a prayer breakfast?

Talk about multi-tasking…

At the National Prayer Breakfast, the President called for prayers to help Schwarzenegger’s ratings on The Apprentice.

With one comment, he managed to make what could be considered a simple, casual joke into…

…a jab at Arnold, by reminding his ratings were higher;

…a commercial for The Apprentice show;

…a tweak at the Left and their Sham-stream media, knowing full well it’s impact on them;

…and a tweak at Republican politicians, too full of themselves and their image to act like a normal guy.

The main event continues, and we pay homage to La Maestro…

…he is the King.