Question: when can’t a father defend his daughter?

Answer: when he’s a Republican President.

Nordstrom has announced that Ivanka Trump’s retail line is being removed. Then, President Trump tweeted disapproval, and that their decision was political.

(C’mon, folks, they were happy enough carrying her line when he was The Donald.)

Of course, the Left’s heads exploded. Cue the faux “that’s not presidential” outrage.

So the Left is fine with attacking a woman because she’s the daughter of Pres Trump…but he can’t defend his daughter because he’s the President. Got that?

Since when are children of a president rendered indefensible by that relationship?

Since when does becoming president remove one’s right to defend their children?

Evidently, only when they’re Republicans.