Rush was talking about how unswerving the Left is because their ideology is their cause.

But, then he says the Right doesn’t have a cohesive cause, that we don’t have the same type of ideological agenda that puts us forever on the front lines forcing it on others.

We disagree…the Right has a cause: honoring individual Liberty, and the Rule of Law. And its that belief in Liberty of the individual that precludes relentlessly forcing it upon others.

That restraint doesn’t work with the Left, because they don’t want individual Liberty. So, in pushing their agenda relentlessly they’re freed from the bonds such a principle inflicts.

The problem with Rush’s thinking is that he addresses the Left’s tactics as a cohesive cause, but really, their overarching cause is Control, or an anti-Individual-Liberty agenda.

Their tactics must, by definition, allow whatever methods are necessary for Control.

The Right’s cause, by definition, restrains from the lawlessness the Left’s cause allows.

Sucks to be Us, but then at least we’re not like Them.

Those ‘experts’ wailing that Pres Trump may have exposed foreign sources should think about the published leaks effect of advising terrorists what we know, and how we know it.

After all, terrorists read newspapers too.

By publishing a leak, the media revealed to EVERYONE what a man in the street didn’t need to know…the leaker, AND THE MEDIA, are the ones to be held responsible here.

Trying to bloody President Trump has become a Washington Post pasttime, and this latest story about the President passing Russia classified info is much ado about nothing.

Of course we work with other nations; global security and a war on terrorism rank among the highest priorities that would encourage information sharing on a need-to-know basis.

And our intel-agencies work with their intel-agencies, as necessary, to get the job done.

In a DC-world where a murdered DNC staffer has just been linked to WikiLeaks days prior to his death, you’d think the Washington Post would find time to report such an event.

Right? In a tizzy over ‘Russia-hacked-the-election’…but nothing on a DNC staffer whose July 2016 murder seems more closely related to the real story than Vladamir Putin?

But they choose ankle-biting the leader of our country instead, and who knows how much this disruptive tactic will affect the way our allies choose to work with us going forward?

The sham-stream’s bloody-Trump efforts border on treasonous.

A Democrat email trolling for OFA support brings up the spectre of Democrat voter intimidation in the South during the ’60’s, as if somehow it wasn’t their Party doing it.

The KKK was the Democrat militant arm. Jim Crow laws were a Democrat construct. Bull Connor was a Democrat. Deep south lynchings were conducted by Democrats.

So a Democrat congressman evoking the image of voter intimidation in order to get people to support their cause would be laughable, if it wasn’t so historically misleading and tragic.

You can’t make this stuff up.

Lost in the kerfuffle that sham-stream media floods the airwaves with every day is a very real scandal: Obama used a ludicrous Russian-collusion concept to spy on Republicans.

Ask yourself: what possible collusion could affect an American election, when the entire sham-stream media, in line with Democrats, control the daily news cycle?

Answer? NONE.

Our election process consists of 1) votes, and 2) counting votes. Unless someone can alter this reality, that election process cannot be tampered with by foreign entities.

(Before leaving office, Obama had 3 months to prove vote tampering, if he could have. The fact no hint of such an activity was found means it didn’t happen.)

And, if you want to argue that damaging information about a presidential candidate could influence voters, ask yourself…if it’s that provably damaging, wouldn’t you want to know?

And, can you imagine how BAD that information must be, that the sham-stream media, with all it’s reach and power, can’t spin or veil it to neutralize it’s effect on voters?

Foreign collusion is a ridiculous concept…there’s only one reason to imply such a thing.

To justify using intelligence agencies to spy on a political opponent.

Let’s hope honest Democrats are tired of this pattern.

But in the meantime, let’s feed the flames by indicting Hillary.

If Russia did indeed tamper, then Democrat president Obama failed.

According to reports, the FBI’s been investigating for Russian collusion since last July.

The fact no evidence has surfaced should tell reasonable people all they need to know.

After all, with the leaking that’s been going on by Obama embeds in the ‘deepstate’ of all the various intelligence agencies, if there was any collusion there, we would have heard.

As much as Democrats are outraged over the results of November, and their screams for impeachment (because of whatever), any evidence would have been used instantly.

8 months, no evidence, but still dragging an investigation on means one thing, and one thing only…it’s a political tool being used to delegitimize President Trump’s election.

8 months.

For aiding Democrats by stringing it along, Comey deserved being fired.

And, let’s face it, there’s a certain satisfaction in hearing caterwauling among Democrats who’ve made a living from partisan interest now accusing the GOP of the same.

We can’t wait to hear them when Trump announces Comey’s replacement.

The real news?

There’s overwhelming evidence Hillary Clinton violated federal laws in mishandling of classified emails during her term as Secretary of State, and is still walking free…

…there’s overwhelming LACK of evidence that the President did anything wrong…

…Comey allowed himself and his agency to become a Democrat-politicized tool, which caused a huge loss of confidence in the agency’s objective handling of law enforcement.

…but the sham-stream media won’t report that news.

Does anyone in the California government read FBI reports?

As IBD notes, the FBI report shows California large-city violent crime has increased by 12.9% as compared to a national average increase of 1.7%. California property crime? It rose 9.2%, as compared to a decrease of 4.2% in the national average.

Criminals have a stranglehold on Californians.

Democrats have a stranglehold on California.

It doesn’t take a political scientist to recognize who’s to blame.

If states like California continue to ignore federal immigration law, can federal agents intervene by invoking RICO statues that make illegal immigration an organized crime?

(Thus justifying city-by-city federal control of the situation.)

Just askin’.