This may explain why Nancy Pelosi thinks tax-cut income hikes for workers are ‘crumbs’…

“Nancy Pelosi’s Net Worth More Than Tripled During Financial Crisis 2008-2010”

Think maybe that has anything to do with her saying a worker now taking home an extra $130 per month on average (as a result of Republican tax-cuts) is merely ‘crumbs’?

Her net worth climbed from $30 million to $99 million while others lost their life savings.

Isn’t it odd, how everyone who had pension funds invested during the 2008-2010 crisis  took a tremendous beating; yet during that same time frame Pelosi tripled her worth?

Idiots at CNN continue to insist on exposing themselves…

Just when you think you’ve dealt with the most idiotic thing a CNN ‘journalist’ can spew, another one pops up…like some bizarre whack-a-mole idiocy gone wild dementia.

Van Jones can’t seem to accurately portray the NRA, now Chris Cilizza can’t seem to recognize the difference between a ‘good guy’ action…and possible cowardice.

Writing at ‘The Point’ for CNN, Cilizza posts an Op-Ed: “Here’s definitive proof that a good guy with a gun doesn’t always stop a bad guy with a gun”

We felt duty-bound to email the following response:

Seriously, Chris…? A ‘good guy’ with a gun would’ve at least tried to do something. A coward with a gun, who fails to do what he’s sworn to do – protect the innocent – can’t be equated with a good guy. Unless, evidently, you’re associated with CNN.

Our subject line?

“Here’s definitive proof…that a CNN journalist doesn’t know a coward from a good guy”

(Ed. Note: We didn’t link to his article, for the obvious reason.)

With the right to pardon, how can anything Mueller do to Trump aides be intimidating?

“…he shall have Power to grant…Pardons for Offences against the United States…”

Article II, section 2, subsection 1 of the Constitution clearly states the President has the power to pardon anyone (which some argue includes himself) if he so desires.

That said, we’re at a loss how Mueller indicting former Trump aides for wrongdoing long before they ever became Trump aides can possibly help in the special counsel probe.

General consensus is that the indictments are meant as a way of coercing the aides. It puts pressure on them to be more cooperative with the Mueller team witch-hunt, and that the President would be too fearful of negative optics to exercise pardon options.

But, as many seem slow to learn, President Trump isn’t your typical politician, and with his popularity rising despite the best effort of FakeNews, optics are an illusory thing.

As noted in an earlier BCP post, the American public has little patience for a one-sided ham-handed version of a glaring political ploy this special counsel probe has become, with its GOP-only tunnel vision…while ignoring very real Democrat criminality.

So, that said, President Trump can make a very real case for ending the charade, and while doing so, pardoning Flynn and other aides being hammered with legal extortion.

We never cease to be amazed how Hillary Clinton can walk among free society, while others are bludgeoned with the selective hammer of partisan grand-jury indictments, no matter how lesser or insignificant the charges used against them may be.

Someone, please remind CNN that the KKK was a Democrat construct…

Is it any wonder why young skulls are full of mush?

Further proof that CNN has no honesty in its ‘journalistic’ corps…

“CNN’s Van Jones: For Young People ‘The NRA Is Like the KKK’ “

Van Jones is a self-avowed Communist, so it shouldn’t be any surprise that he has no problem passing on false, incendiary, and spurious propaganda against conservatives.

We take this opportunity to remind Mr. Jones – the KKK was a Democrat construct, with the goal of blocking the Constitutional rights of black Americans through intimidation…

…whereas the NRA wants to support the Constitutional rights of ALL Americans.

In truth, if you consider that FakeNews media is trying to take away Constitutional rights of Americans through the use of thuggery, intimidation, and inflammatory tactics…

…an accurate comparison to the KKK…would be the journalists of CNN.

Bigger monthly paychecks and now, less expensive health insurance…looking good for GOP heading into mid-terms

No Democrat supported the tax-cuts now putting hundreds more in monthly paychecks.

No Republican supported the Obamacare law taking hundreds from workers’ income, and Democrats are screaming as Pres. Trump takes steps to reduce outrageous costs.

More monthly pay…less monthly healthcare costs…that’s a strong message.

Add that to more blacks and Hispanics getting jobs, and the Wall Street booms fattening pension plans. and a number of opposition Party constituents may see change is good.

If it really is ‘the Economy, stupid’…with midterm elections looming in November, the Republican Party has a great chance to sell that message to fence-riding Independents and Democrats who are tired of paying the high price for their Party’s crony capitalism.

Here’s an answer Sen Rubio could’ve given to that CNN-scripted anti-NRA question at town-hall

Liberals are having a field day exploiting the Feb 14 Florida school shooting.

Here’s the question a student threw in Rubios face at the CNN town hall: “It’s hard to look at you and not look down the barrel of an AR-15 and not look at Nikolas Cruz…Can you tell me right now that you will not accept a single donation from the NRA?”

Here’s one way the Senator could have responded to the (obviously CNN-scripted) question: “I have never, and will never, take a dime from any lawless organization that condones or exploits the criminal use of any types of guns…and that includes CNN.”

“And, for the record, the NRA is a group of law-abiding people who agree with me.”

“Thank you, young man…you’ve been through a lot. Next question, please.”

Is there anything worse than a ‘news’ media (and CNN in particular) that exploits the tragedy of a mass shooting and traumatized children victims to push an agenda?

Mueller’s obstructing his investigation… with the tacit consent of Rosenstein

Dep AG Rosenstein’s instructions to Mueller when establishing special counsel directed him to ensure a “full…thorough investigation” and include “any matters” that arise.

But, if discovery that Hillary and Democrats funded a Russian-sourced dossier using a foreign agent to create the effort in order to tamper with an election and subsequently discredit a sitting President doesn’t draw indictments…then Mueller’s obstructing…

HIS OWN INVESTIGATION.

That is, if a “full, thorough investigation” linking “any matters” means anything.

Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein also has some explaining to do, and should tell Atty Genl Sessions why he has allowed Mueller to ignore the spirit of the appointment.

Rosenstein’s letter explaining a need for special counsel said that he “determined that a Special Counsel is necessary in order for the American people to have full confidence in the outcome. Our nation is grounded on the rule of law, and the public must be assured that government officials administer the law fairly…I am confident that he (Mueller) will follow the facts, apply the law and reach a just result.”

The FBI’s been investigating for almost 2 years. Mueller was up and running 9 months ago. Neither group’s found any Trump-Russia collusion, but a ton of Democrat-Russia collusion…yet despite Rosenstein’s direction, Mueller hasn’t done a thing about it.

If the public is to be “assured that government officials administer the law fairly” why is it there have been no indictments of Hillary Clinton, her campaign team, her lawyers, or the DNC colluding with foreign nationals to tamper with the election process?

Are we to assume Mueller’s lost the ability to ‘follow facts’ and ‘apply the law’?

Or, are Rosenstein and Mueller under the impression ‘the public’ believes administering the law fairly is only meant to apply…when Republicans are in the crosshairs?

Obviously, with the evidence available yet no indictments in sight, this is a witch-hunt, meant to be strung out until November, used by Democrats for the mid-term optics.

President Trump should demand immediate review of the Mueller special counsel effort and insist on a fair application of the law as it applies to both parties, or fold this tent.

He’s at a 50% approval rating – he should lay the case out to the American people…

…the public will give him a fair hearing, even if Mueller won’t.

Democrats want hundreds of millions of tax-dollars…to stop DEMOCRAT-funded Russia election meddling?

YOU.CAN’T.MAKE.THIS.STUFF.UP.

“Pelosi, Schumer want $300 million to protect US election from Russia”

Democrats have just re-defined chutzpah…shameless audacity.

It used to be that the definition of ‘chutzpah’ was someone who kills their parents, then during the murder trial, begging for mercy from the court because they’re orphaned.

Democrat politicians just retired that old saw, with a breathtaking audacity.

Consider: post-election, the current political cycle has revealed that, of the two major political parties, only one has been PROVEN to collusion with Russia for meddling…

…HINT – it ain’t the Republicans.

Only a Democrat would see the logic of demanding hundreds of millions of tax dollars to fight election meddling of Russians…when only Democrats have been funding them.

Open message to Pelosi and Schumer…if you really want to fight Russian election-tampering, we suggest a much simpler and more cost-effective solution for taxpayers…

…DISBAND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.