While everyone’s in a tizzy over a suggestion the President made that Democrats go all in and put their anti-gun ideas into a gun-control bill in Congress, we remember back to his DACA days of meeting with them, when he snookered Democrats at a meeting.
We’re betting he’s setting up anti-gun Democrats, inviting them to expose their bias.
Americans are pro-gun ownership…he knows it…and it will show in midterm elections.
We take our hats off to President Trump…well played, sir.
Arguably, the proportion of Republican-v-Democrat population in any given union is as equal as that of the general populace…why are union donations so heavily Democrat?
When over 90% of all union donations go to Democrats – how is that representative?
If unions represent their entire membership, shouldn’t political donations reflect that?
Andy McCarthy writes at NRO “Unlike fervent Trump supporters, I do not condemn the investigation of a presidential campaign in principle. To the contrary, I have repeatedly said that, if there was strong evidence on which to base suspicions of Trump–Russia collusion, the Obama administration would have been derelict not to investigate. I also do not see this as a pro- or anti-Trump issue.” (bold emphasis added)
There’s strong evidence a Party colluded with foreign agents…but not Trump’s Party.
With all due respect, Mr. McCarthy…it became an ‘anti-Trump’ issue when evidence is found that Democrats colluded with foreign agents, but no legal action’s been taken.
Acting Deputy AG Rosenstein’s authorization to Mueller specifically stated to follow up ALL matters that arise from the foreign collusion investigation…not just ‘Trump matters’.
Mueller failing to do so – after it’s been revealed TO ALL that Democrats (including the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign) DID collude w-foreign agents to tamper…
…proves the WITCH-HUNT this investigation has become.
Amidst caterwauling back-&-forth of Democrat and Republican legal minds in the matter of Obama’s Justice Dept and FBI abusing FISA processes, there’s a missed point…
…a looming election meant the FISA court judges needed to put heavier emphasis on the ‘opposition’ research efforts substantiation, to avoid appearance of impropriety.
Sure, there are standard requirements to fulfill in requesting a FISA warrant…
…but to not expect more from a Party in power when seeking pre-election surveillance capability against the OTHER Party is not just incompetence…it’s extremely unethical.
This isn’t just about Democrat chicanery – it goes on every election cycle, and no doubt some in the Republican Party get nasty as well, but this is about a legal process that should see the writing on that wall…and put a stronger emphasis on burden of proof.
Sorry, but ‘trust me judge, we trust the source’ is NOT an acceptable criteria.
And ANY judge who doesn’t see that is not someone who deserves to be a judge…
...in ANY court.
PERIOD.
FULL.STOP.
Randomly hurling ‘assault weapon’ epithets is ridiculous when you consider the fact that ANYTHING used to assault someone can be loosely defined as an ‘assault weapon’.
A knife, a baseball bat…hell, a pencil in someone’s eye can be defined that way.
If it’s meant to classify AR-15s as ‘military-style’ assault weapons, it’s a blatant lie, since military-style assault weapons have automatic-fire capability, and AR-15s don’t.
Still, if you’re a Liberal…why let honesty get in the way of a useful narrative?
Breitbart headline…“Parkland Educator to CNN: Armed Teachers Will Shoot Students of Color ‘At a Higher Rate’”
So, is the ‘educator’ saying teachers are racist, or black kids cause more problems?
Washington Examiner headline: “Heritage Foundation: 64% of Trump’s agenda already done, faster than Reagan” (underline emphasis added)
Daily Caller nails it… “ICE: Oakland Mayor Who Warned Illegal Criminals Of Raid ‘No Better Than A Gang Lookout’”
Ask not for whom the bell tolls, California.
“According to Rasmussen, 54% of Americans believe government failure is to “blame for the mass shooting.” Only 33% of Americans blame guns. Eleven percent of Americans say they are unsure what contributed to…the mass shooting.”
So common sense prevails, but…that other 46%…? Not so much.
The problem with the Democrat ‘Schiff memo’ is it doesn’t address the charges of FISA abuse based on using an unsubstantiated 3rd-party hearsay dossier to get a warrant.
Much like its author, Democrat Adam Schiff, it’s full of muddy water obscuring reality.
You could say – like its author – it’s full of…well…Schiff.