Amidst caterwauling back-&-forth of Democrat and Republican legal minds in the matter of Obama’s Justice Dept and FBI abusing FISA processes, there’s a missed point…

…a looming election meant the FISA court judges needed to put heavier emphasis on the ‘opposition’ research efforts substantiation, to avoid appearance of impropriety.

Sure, there are standard requirements to fulfill in requesting a FISA warrant…

…but to not expect more from a Party in power when seeking pre-election surveillance capability against the OTHER Party is not just incompetence…it’s extremely unethical.

This isn’t just about Democrat chicanery – it goes on every election cycle, and no doubt some in the Republican Party get nasty as well, but this is about a legal process that should see the writing on that wall…and put a stronger emphasis on burden of proof.

Sorry, but ‘trust me judge, we trust the source’ is NOT an acceptable criteria.

And ANY judge who doesn’t see that is not someone who deserves to be a judge…

...in ANY court.

PERIOD.

FULL.STOP.