Do foreign nations meddle with the American election process? Sure. Should there be an effort made to stop or neutralize such efforts? America’s been doing that for years.

There are federal agencies in place and tasked with that effort on an ongoing basis.

Where a ‘witch-hunt’ is in play, however, is when a political Party…

1. conspires to entrap an opposition campaign;
2. activates ‘lures’ to set up suggestive meetings;
3. employs a lawyer-cutout network to organize and fabricate an opposition research dossier built on lies and lurid innuendo;
4. creates the illusion of multiple-source stories that are actually single-sourced from that one fabricated dossier;
5. uses efforts 1, 2, 3, & 4 to get a FISA warrant to covertly surveille
   1. an opposition campaign, and, then,
   2. a presidential transition team…
   3. without satisfying necessary legal criteria for such warrants;
6. lies, misleads, and obscures on 3 subsequent FISA warrant renewals;
7. deliberately leaks fabricated information to FakeNews media;
8. then demands an investigation of the campaign/administration being targeted.

THAT, my friends, is a WITCH-HUNT…defined.

To allow FakeNews to conflate ‘witch-hunt’ with ‘meddler-hunt’ does disservice to all.

This is right in your wheel-house, Mr. President.

Post-meeting, when FakeNews asks if you talked election-meddling, you say…

…Yeah…I told him to ‘cut it out’ – just as force-fully as Obama did.

Then, during the stunned silence that follows, hit ’em again, by saying

‘Hey, c’mon folks, give Mr. Obama a break. You wouldn’t want me to embarrass the last President, by implying that issue needed any more attention than he gave it…right?”

EPIC opportunity to tweak the Left.

Watching the rank display of partisanship on Capitol Hill during the Strzok hearings, it was hard to not throw things at the TV every time that biased FBI agent smirked.

The real howler came when he stated bias never affected his investigative practices.

How to unpack this?

First, even the Justice Dept. Inspector General noted Strzok’s bias, in his report.

And, let’s see, besides the very partisan note of every text he sent out…the fact that there was a ton of evidence against Hillary’s use of a non-secure server; the fact that her aides lied during FBI interviews; the fact that none of the servers/phones/other electronic devices were seized; and the fact that every action Strzok took was to shut the investigation down without charges…all point to a huge bias toward Hillary.

Then, the fact that Strzok was texting about using ‘lures’ against the Trump campaign people BEFORE an official investigation was started; the fact that he was openly texting about using ‘insurance policies’ and other methods to stymie Trump’s campaign; the fact that the Democrat-paid dirt dossier was used to get FISA surveillance warrants; the fact that the initial warrant application and EVERY 90-day renewal required sourcing of the dossier be disclosed to the FISC court, but wasn’t…tells us all we need to know.

Where there was evidence in an investigation, against Hillary, it was ignored.

Where there was NO evidence, to investigate Trump, it was created.

Bias? YOU BET.

Unless one wants to ignore the FACTS.

Getting so tired of the race-card they always play.

“Let’s drop the euphemisms: Donald Trump is a racist president“

Whether condemning violent unrest of protesters, or trying to keep the Nation safe with sane border control enforcement, no part of those issues involve ‘racist’ motives.

What does involve racist motives? Chanting ‘racist’ indiscriminately.

A President’s job is to enforce laws. Maybe those race-baiters so eager to bash him would be wiser to turn their bile toward the real problem – bad behavior, and bad laws.

Unless, of course, they just want ANY reason to bash Trump…however unwarranted.

That said…

…unwarranted ‘racism’ headlines are indicative of race-baiter FakeNews media.

Breitbart headline promises a Democrat fiasco looms…“Kevin McCarthy: Dems Will Get to Vote to Abolish All Immigration Enforcement Before Midterms”

Democrats posturing for their radical base are pushing an ‘Abolish ICE’ bill.

They probably figured the Republican-held House would not consider it, but in a stroke of pure genius, it seems Republican leaders will bring that bill to a vote, pre-election.

Ooops…

Great news, because “Americans – even Democrat voters — are by a vast majority opposed to abolishing ICE. In the latest Harvard/Harris Poll, 3-in-4 swing voters said they opposed the Democrats’ plan to end all immigration enforcement across the U.S.”

So, House Democrats have to 1) expose themselves to their base if they fail to vote for it because they fear a voter backlash…or 2) be exposed to a backlash by voting for it.

Looks like some Democrats may even be…unhhh…concerned their bluff was called.

Great quote on this self-inflicted drama from American Thinker’s Thomas Lifson…“The House Democratic Caucus should be ordering clown suits for their group picture.”

(emphasis added…with pleasure)

Can’t wait to see how this plays out.

Gateway Pundit…“OUTRAGEOUS!! Dem Rep Steve Cohen Says Disgraced FBI Agent Peter Strzok Deserves a PURPLE HEART“

Yeah, yeah…give the black-heart adulterer a Purple Heart…that’s the ticket.

If anyone deserves a Purple Heart, Rep Cohen…it’s his cheated-on wife.

Daily Caller…“Hillary Clinton Running In 2020? It Sure Sounds Like It“

We’re more inclined to believe she’ll pose as ‘in it’…so she can rake in cash.

House Republicans should have spent less time on Strzok’s anti-Trump bias, and more time on the raw incompetence and deliberate legal bungling during his Clinton probe.

Maybe it’s the optics…considering the imminent midterm election?

(There were questions on Hillary’s investigation, but just not reported as widely.)

Big deal – Mueller indicts more Russians, this time for hacking a Democrat National Committee server that was NEVER turned over to authorities by the Democrats??

This is an effort to deflect and refocus on Russians, rather than Democrat chicanery.

THE-DEMOCRAT-SERVER-CLAIMED-TO-BE-HACKED-WAS-NEVER-CHECKED.

Democrats refused to give the hacked server to the FBI or any federal authority and hired the firm CrowdStrike to do a ‘forensic analysis’, then gave that info to the FBI.

Got that?

• Democrats claimed a hack;
• Democrats refused to let federal authorities investigate the claim;
• Democrats hired a private firm to perform analysis of the ‘hack’;
• Mueller relies on non-FBI, non-federal information to issue indictments.

This is beyond insanity.

If for no other reason, Mueller should be fired for violating basic legal protocols.

FRONTPAGE MAG article…

“…memos the FBI is turning over to Congress show the bureau possessed at least three versions of the dossier and its mostly unverified allegations of collusion…”

The first FISA warrant against the Trump campaign was signed off in Oct, 2016, and all indications are the dirt-dossier paid for by Democrats was used as its foundation.

The lead FBI agent, Strzok, texted in Jan 2017 indicating knowledge of multiple dossier versions, and guess what? The first renewal of that FISA warrant was Jan 2017.

That means intelligence operatives, re-submitting the FISA warrant for renewals three times, knew there were multiple versions…but was the FISC court advised of this?

We doubt it. Deliberately withholding such information may be yet another crime.

(And, if Strzok’s FISA judge buddy did know, there should be hell to pay.)

Indictable actions keep getting revealed…indictments should be forthcoming.

The question remains…WHEN?