If your son-brother-dad was being accused of sexual misconduct by a woman after over 30 years, and she couldn’t say when it happened, where it happened, and was refuted by her several ‘witnesses’ who claim it NEVER happened…what would you think?

And, now the accuser’s lawyers are saying the FBI must interview their client before they turn over affidavits/data relating to the polygraph test she claims to have made.

WHY? She testified UNDER OATH before the Senate…what’s there to interview? The FBI just takes statements – if a sworn testimony isn’t a ‘statement’, what is?

Furthermore, as part of her testimony, the polygraph process is now evidence – how can there be any justification to withhold supporting documentation to her testimony?

Nothing in her allegation passes a smell-test…even a Democrat must see that.

Doesn’t remember when, where, or who; won’t provide ‘corroborating’ polygraph data; demands to be interviewed after already testifying at length…this is a farce.

By their standard…

…your son-brother-father is ONE baseless allegation away from lynching.

Unless (we’re assuming) they’re a Democrat.

Brian Whitman fancies himself the ‘lovable’ Liberal of The Morning Answer on the So-Cal talk radio show at AM590, The Answer. Liberal he may be…lovable, not so much.

Problem is, he can’t stop…lying.

In his defense, Liberals really can’t help it…without sound data, it’s who they HAVE to be in order to push a failed agenda…problem is, they’re never held accountable for lies.

This morning, while pre-emptively dismissing the FBI report on Brett Kavanaugh, he lied about Bill Clinton having been impeached for a ‘non-crime’, to support his viewpoint.

Making the case that – if Kavanaugh lied under oath to the Senate – it disqualifies him to be on the Supreme Court (so, yeah… p-r-o-l-o-n-g-I-n-g the FBI probe is ‘justifiable’).

Then he used as an equivalent how Bill Clinton was impeached “for a non-crime” (which is a popular meme on the Left, falsely attesting to Clinton being impeached for sex).

Once again, with feeling…Brian: LYING to a Grand Jury IS a crime.

Bill Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice, having lied to a Grand Jury…he wasn’t convicted, because lock-step Senate Democrats failed to uphold law.

So, sure, lying under oath is serious…

…(fear-of-flying, double-doors) Christine Blasey Ford should remember that, too…

…but please, stop the whitewash of Slick Willie.

Now that an ex-boyfriend has sworn under-penalty-of-felony that Blasey-Ford did coach at least one person on how to deal with polygraph-testing, the shoe’s on the other foot.

‘Cuz…she testified at the Senate hearing she never gave that type advice to anyone.

By DEMOCRAT standards of guilty-by-accusation, she must prove she didn’t do it.

What’s fair is fair, right?

Charlie C., a friend to BlueCollar, texts “Just heard a great idea. Trump should nominate Hillary…that would get investigation finally started that we all believe has been needed.”

♥♥♥♥♥♥

(But we’re assured by anonymous sources she’s already under investigation…sshhhh!)

“Trump’s fortune takes $1B hit in his pursuit of the presidency”

He knew it would cost him; did it anyway.

Who among us would be willing to lose 25% of our net worth, let alone take the added attacks against him and family by Left-wing bombthrowers and never-Trump’ers?

Uncouth, boorish, crass? Whatever.

The man has guts.

American Greatness article says it all:

“Dems Risk Losing Suburban Women with Kavanaugh Attacks”

Author Julie Kelley writes: “A bungled political assassination attempt on Brett Kavanaugh will cost the Democrats more than a seat on the Supreme Court: The party might also have killed its edge with suburban women just weeks before the pivotal midterm elections. The near-unanimous reaction to this travesty among my fellow suburban moms is unlike anything I’ve seen in the Trump era.”

Seriously: anti-Trumpers who’ve complained non-stop over his vulgarity now have to juxtapose that boorishness, with vile Senate Democrats…who fight to outdo him.

If we weren’t so obviously predisposed to support the GOP agenda, we might note to the Democrats that there’s a reason so many National Enquirer scandal sheets are still in the point-of-purchase racks at the neighborhood supermarket checkout stands…

…the majority of Americans don’t care for that genre…in media – OR their politicians.

But why ask them to STOP DIGGING? By all means, keep it up Democrats…

…we have a House of Representatives we want to keep Republican…

…and we’re guessing that mobilizing for a GOP Senator vote will bleed over.

Another article “The Dems’ Midterm Mess” suggests a Democrat backfire “…by turning up the heat on Kavanaugh, it might well be that they’re cooking themselves.”

Much as we hate smear politics…we love self-destructing politicians…so, if that’s what it takes to once more stimulate the anti-Swamp fever in America’s electorate…

…keep it up Democrats.

Just kidding (as if anyone didn’t already know that).

But, as the hypocrisy continues unabated…this could actually be fun.

No one seems to care that (deserving of a small ‘s’) senator Feinstein abused the trust of Kavanaugh’s accuser, by refusing to properly follow Ms. Blasey Ford’s request?

Ford stated during her Senate testimony that she had hoped “…that providing the information confidentially would be sufficient to allow the Senate to consider Mr. Kavanaugh’s serious misconduct without having to make myself, my family, or anyone’s family vulnerable to the personal attacks.” (bold emphasis added)

But Feinstein sat on the information. 

Not only did she NOT allow ‘the Senate’ to consider the accusation, by withholding that letter DELIBERATELY, Feinstein’s act led to the exposure of Ford, and others.

Where’s the outrage?

The Senate should officially rebuke Feinstein for her egregious, unethical behavior.

(We’d call for impeachment, but the search for a GOP spine is still ongoing.)

And, for those Feinstein apologists who say it’s a misrepresentation, that the accuser never asked for such conditions, we’re forced to ask the only question left…

…which liar, Feinstein or Ford, should we believe?

In an American Thinker article “The hidden agenda behind ‘climate change'”, the writer reminds us of the assault on our free-market system by globalists.

UN officials have revealed on numerous occasions that their climate-change agenda is really about redistributing wealth – specifically, American wealth – to other nations, and in the process, destroy our free-market capitalism agenda in favor of communism.

Well worth the read, to serve as a reminder.

Does beg the question, no…?