If your son-brother-dad was being accused of sexual misconduct by a woman after over 30 years, and she couldn’t say when it happened, where it happened, and was refuted by her several ‘witnesses’ who claim it NEVER happened…what would you think?

And, now the accuser’s lawyers are saying the FBI must interview their client before they turn over affidavits/data relating to the polygraph test she claims to have made.

WHY? She testified UNDER OATH before the Senate…what’s there to interview? The FBI just takes statements – if a sworn testimony isn’t a ‘statement’, what is?

Furthermore, as part of her testimony, the polygraph process is now evidence – how can there be any justification to withhold supporting documentation to her testimony?

Nothing in her allegation passes a smell-test…even a Democrat must see that.

Doesn’t remember when, where, or who; won’t provide ‘corroborating’ polygraph data; demands to be interviewed after already testifying at length…this is a farce.

By their standard…

…your son-brother-father is ONE baseless allegation away from lynching.

Unless (we’re assuming) they’re a Democrat.