It’s high time to name the act of faking being offended, which Leftists use to shutdown any dialogue or activity that could negate or be harmful to their relentless narrative…

…Fauxfending; BlueCollar defined as verb: falsely claiming offense, most often used with terms like ‘racist’, ‘misogynist’, or ‘homophobic’ to subdue inconvenient truths.

‘Faux‘ adjective, def: artificial or imitation; fake

Next time a Liberal friend labels ‘Make America Great Again’ as racist…

…understand that they’re just fauxfended…‘cuz it’ll shut you up.

Class dismissed

Asked (on CNN) if it was possible Trump could be a Russian asset, former, disgraced acting FBI director McCabe stated “I think it’s possible. I think that’s why we started our investigation. And I’m really anxious to see where Director Mueller concludes that.”

Why is that, Andy?

Did he take $145 million from Russians and their agents?

No – wait – that was Hillary.

Did he okay and facilitate Russia acquiring critical American uranium assets?

No – wait – that was Hillary, too.

Mr. Trump doesn’t have a pay-to-play record of taking tens of millions of dollars from Russians, and as a private citizen had nothing to do with critical uranium asset sales.

So, Andy, what are we left to believe…

…that your FBI just got WHICH candidate to investigate wrong?

Otherwise, how is it the much-vaunted FBI chose to investigate a candidate who had no proven underhanded dealings with Russia and/or its agents…

…but didn’t investigate the candidate WHO DID?

Headlines are already erupting about Smollett being arrested and charged with filing a false police report; you can expect the Left & media to write this off as a ‘publicity stunt’.

But this disgusting farce was directed, very specifically, against a segment of America, and folks, regardless what the Left says, targeting groups qualifies as a Hate Crime.

PERIOD.

FULL.STOP.

(They warned of Trump-supporter hate crimes…guess they got tired of waiting for it.)

As reported by the Washington Times this morning: “Pelosi vows quick action on resolution to counter Trump emergency declaration” (referring to ‘The Wall’).

But…

They voted for a wall in the past; they know drugs are flooding into the country; they know human/sex trafficking is rampant; they know terrorists are trying to get in daily…

…and Nancy Pelosi thinks this message will resonate with Americans?

How is putting her Party in the same camp as drug cartels and sex traffickers a winning message for the Democrats? In what alternate Reality is that a good thing?

President Trump’s asking for less funding to build effective barriers than Congress authorized in the past to research the sexual habits of sea turtles and banana slugs.

Seriously. When was the last time anyone heard of a Democrat politician worry about spending too much…on anything? The hypocrisy of this anti-wall effort is astounding.

Elites, who enclose themselves in security enclaves, would leave the rest of America exposed. Let those without walls and locked doors in their homes cast the first stone.

A study several years ago estimated illegal immigration costs the United States $135bn annually (and you can bet that amount hasn’t gone down since the study came out).

Why would any American political party be unwilling to spend $5bn to build a wall that can help reduce drug/human/sex trafficking, and possibly save up to $135bn a year?!?

Is this really the hill they wish to die on?

No stronger argument can be made for exacting justice on those seeking to tear down our election process, and 2016 results.

“Virginia voters — including African-Americans — have Northam’s back”

Further proof racism doesn’t exist, if there’s a (d) after their name.

Class dismissed.

A headline on the alleged hate-hoaxer Smollett caught the eye today “Does the Jussie Smollett case really end with the Nigerians?” suggesting political chicanery’s afoot.

The article alludes to a very curious fact:

A ‘hate-crime’ (involving a gay man who happens to be black and claims a lynch-noose was wrapped around his neck as well) is timed just as 2 black Democrat senators who are presidential contenders (Kamala Harris & Cory Booker) offer an anti-lynching bill…

…that had last-minute language specifying homophobia added to the bill…

…and would (coincidentally?) play well to their black-American and gay voter base.

Conspiracy theory…or Democrat chicanery?

Hopefully, time will tell.

We repeat, for clarity…the REAL Haters are the hate-crime hoaxers.

So deep is their hate, they have to manufacture a justification for it.

New York’s flake congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez compares a southern border wall to the Berlin Wall built by the Soviet Union, which further demonstrates she’s a flake.

The Berlin Wall was built by Russians to keep East Berliners in the Soviet bloc.

Our southern border wall is needed to keep illegals and undesirables OUT.

If it weren’t so serious, it would be damn funny.

On the one hand, unhinged Lefties have to CREATE hate hoaxes in order to gen up continuous outrage against Pres Trump, while political leaders stir up their base.

Then, we have the never-Trump’er crowd of so-called Republicans, so anxious to tear the President down that they portray every move he makes as somehow a failure, with no ability to see by introspection they’re using circular logic to accomplish their goal.

Latest examples:

1. Jonah Goldberg’s article that “Trump’s National-Emergency Declaration Is an Act of Weakness” which tries to make the case that not being able to get the Congress to do their job is his failure (as he’s forced to declare an emergency);
2. David French’s article from the 15th that “Trump’s Emergency Declaration Is Contemptuous of the Rule of Law” which is self-explanatory, but false.

Unpack this – the President makes EVERY effort to get Congress to do their job, lays out in factual detail the drug problem, human trafficking problem, sex trafficking problem and nat’l security problem open borders PLAINLY create…and Congress won’t budge.

A normal person would recognize the grave dangers imposed by open borders, realize the need to build more effective barriers, and proceed accordingly – but not Congress.

And somehow, for never-Trump’ers, this is a failure on…Trump’s part?

For TWO years he tried to avoid executive action and asked Congress to step up.

If anyone showed strength of character and respect for rule-of-law…it’s Pres Trump.

And if anyone showed weakness and contempt for rule-of-law…it’s Congress.

It never ceases to amaze that those ham-stringing this President have the audacity to complain because the President isn’t cooperating with their ham-stringing efforts.