…so, conversely, the president hates Republicans more than he LOVES Iran?

Another day, another Foreign Relations stooge claiming the proof that, by writing an open letter to Iran, ‘Republicans hate Obama more than they love America.’

Why doesn’t the obvious ever get spoken?

Since, FIRST, Obama refused to include Congress in his ‘negotiations’ with Iran…

…then by the same Foreign Relation standard noted above, wouldn’t it be just as easy to say, by Obama doing so, he hates Republicans more than he loves Iran?

After all, the Constitution mandates Legislative Branch involvement, but…

  • Obama’s the one who refuses to work with Congress on this matter;
  • Obama’s the one who restricted Congress from discussing this matter;
  • Obama’s the one who fought against triggered sanctions in this matter; and,
  • Obama’s the one who is PUSHING to allow Iran nuclear capabilities.

(For the sake of accuracy, isn’t it logical to state only love for Iran could motivate a world leader to push for the #1 terror exporter to acquire nuclear weapons?)

Would you encourage your kids to give their school bully brass knuckles? No?

Then why encourage the world to give a global terror-exporter…nuclear weapons?

Case closed…America’s president hates Republicans more than he LOVES Iran.

Hey…don’t blame BlueCollar…we’re just using the Liberal standard.

Would you want to be married to a police officer in Ferguson, MO, these days?

Can you imagine how the husband or wife of a Ferguson cop feels when their spouse goes to work?

Political race-baiters should be indicted for their despicable actions.

Police unions should step up to protect their law enforcement membership, and demand accountability from those in high public office who endanger officers.

Period. FULL STOP.

Want to hear a scary reason why the White House is undermining Hillary…?

Is the White House sabotaging Hillary on this email scandal?

If you’re wondering why, ask yourself who in the White House would benefit the most from Hillary losing her 2016 presidential front-runner status…

…and the name ‘Michelle Obama’ should come to mind.

As major media steps up rhetoric about the lack of depth for a presidential nominee in the Democrat Party, don’t be surprised when her name pops up.

Hey, if a community organizer qualifies for the job…why not his wife?

Just sayin’.

If the NSA can catch up to fast-moving terrorists, why not a slow-moving grandma…?

Arguments to justify phone eavesdropping and email monitoring by our intelligence-gathering agencies have long centered around the needs of national security.

Such capabilities by definition must be fast when it comes to sorting data. (We’ve all seen endless ‘where’s the bomb?’ scenarios on ’24’ emphasizing a need for speed.)

The American public should demand lawmakers push the NSA to kick that high-tech system into overdrive, and produce emails linked to the lawless in public office.

You can’t have it both ways: if it’s an effective system, it’s got limitless capabilities.

What good is NSA surveillance-gathering, if it can’t be used against lawbreakers?

Think about it: if it can track down fast-moving terror cells bent on doing evil against Americans, it should be able to catch an old lady bent on hiding her wrong-doing.

NSA intel-gathering casts a wide net…by necessity, lightning-fast…

…it’s time to sort through the smelly fish in Hillary’s Catch-of-the-Day.

If it wasn’t for the cable guy, this president wouldn’t know a damn thing

Obama claims the first he heard of Hillary’s email setup was on the news.

Rush Limbaugh lists all the other ‘first heard on the news’ moments…

  • Fast-&-Furious scandal;
  • Secret Service scandal;
  • AirForce1 Buzzing Manhattan scandal;
  • VA Veteran Abuses scandal;
  • IRS Targeting Conservatives scandal;
  • Gruber’s ‘Obamacare For Stupid Americans’ scandal;
  • Hillary Clinton ‘Private Email Only’ scandal.

Looks like, if it wasn’t for CNN, he wouldn’t know he’d been re-elected.

But then, how would he know…since he skips his intel briefings…?

Andrew McCarthy asks why Obama would tolerate Clinton’s email behavior?

Besides the obvious (lawlessness begets lawlessness), how would he have known?

His intel-gathering services that would have picked up on it he largely ignored.

Say what you will about his actions – Obama’s managed to set a new standard…

…for future White House tenants…ANYTHING GOES.

There’s a new placard on the Oval Office desk…

…‘The Buck Stops Short Of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.’