When is it a lie, when is it a ‘storytelling’? “‘View’ hosts defend Biden amid fake war tale: Wasn’t lying, he’s a ‘good storyteller'” When Democrat, it’s story-telling.
Question asked…question answered.
Class dismissed.
When is it a lie, when is it a ‘storytelling’? “‘View’ hosts defend Biden amid fake war tale: Wasn’t lying, he’s a ‘good storyteller'” When Democrat, it’s story-telling.
Question asked…question answered.
Class dismissed.
The Democrat Legacy continues: just re-name the capital ‘Sack-excrement-o’…
“California: Junkies, Feces, Urine as Homeless Crisis Hits Capital”
But, hey, keep voting (D), ‘cuz…you know…Trump.
Trump’s a scoundrel and misogynist? Nowhere near Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy.
Trump’s in Russia’s pocket? Uhhh…last two years show DEMOCRATS dwell there. (Follow-up question: why no concern Russia is driving the Democrat bus?)
Trump’s a liar? Yeah, yeah…let’s talk about manipulating FISA courts and leakers.
Trump’s a racist? Only lies and out-of-context quotes push that narrative.
If anyone wants to shut down these arguments…just suggest talking POLICY.
Higher taxes? Open borders? Abortion AFTER birth? Free healthcare for illegals?
Yeah…let’s talk policy.
Just when you thought hypocrisy couldn’t be greater, House Democrats show it can go double-down, as this “Storming Back to the Impeachment Charade” op-ed suggests.
So, the Party of womanizing, i.e…the Bill Clinton/Ted Kennedy/Chris Dodd sleazeballs of ‘put some ice on it’ and ‘waitress-sandwich’ fame…want to harass Donald Trump over something that may have happened while he was a private citizen…
…and expect everyone to ignore what their Party leaders did while in elected office?
Do the House Democrats understand what they’re setting themselves up for?
Anthony ‘Carlos Danger’ Weiner, anyone? And what about their legendary Democrat supporters Harvey ‘casting-couch’ Weinstein, and underage predator Jeffrey Epstein?
How can a private citizen be demonized by the same Party where elected Democrats acted far worse and their private supporters acted feloniously…on a continual basis?
Attacking the President over his private life might work to stir up their rabid base…
…not so sure how it’ll work with reasonable people.
Earth to Jerry Nadler – those rocky shoals you’re steering into may be a problem.
At the Washington Times: “California law enforcement just got more dangerous”
At breakfast over the weekend, a former LAPD officer was livid about a neighboring state’s added restrictions on law enforcement, that would put police in harm’s way.
‘Look up Newhall Incident,’ he said, referring to 4 Highway Patrol officers killed when gunned down during a 1970 traffic stop resulting from a firearms brandishing report.
Training for use of deadly force took a whole new turn after that event, when review of the situation revealed earlier concepts of law enforcement were contributing factors.
The retired high-ranking LAPD official was worried that new politically-correct actions such as those in Arizona would take law-enforcement back to 1970-style at-risk tactics.
On Monday, the Times story brought home an ugly reality right here in California.
By putting law enforcement in a tighter box on determining in ‘real-time’ situations what does and doesn’t justify using deadly force, it certainly looks like we’re headed that way.
As the Left continues denigrating ANY law enforcement activity, and Democrats keep pushing use of ‘alternative’ measures to avoid necessary force issues, those taking the beating are not the criminals…but the cops, putting themselves on the line everyday.
But don’t just believe BlueCollar…“Attorney General William Barr noted that from 2014 through 2017, there was a 20 percent increase in assaults against police.”
In the face of that statistic, as Democrats put MORE handcuffs on law enforcement, you have to wonder…how do these brave police officers continue to do their job?
And, Gov. Newsom…as assaults increase, how do you justify this latest idiocy?
(Hat-tip thanks, LF, for getting us started down this path…and for your service.)
YOU.CAN’T.MAKE.THIS.STUFF.UP.
“House Dems to probe Trump’s alleged role in hush-money payments”
Can anyone spell ‘c-l-u-e-l-e-s-s’?
That same Party in Congress had a special account set up FOR DECADES that used tax-payer money to hush up their sexual dalliances WHILE IN PUBLIC OFFICE.
And they think investigating someone’s private life before being elected is a good idea?
Can’t wait to see how President Trump turns this one back on them.