Could see this coming a mile away – The Hill headline…“West Hollywood City Council votes to have Trump’s Walk of Fame star removed’”
Citing Donald Trump’s “…disturbing treatment of women” the W. Hollywood city council will ask the LA city council and Hollywood chamber of commerce to remove his star.
‘Disturbing treatment of women’?
Considering the #MeToo movement in full-swing…they’ll end up with a lot of holes.
‘Stands-with-Lie’ faux Indian Elizabeth Warren says the U.S. criminal justice system is racist “front-to-back”…oblivious to the racist lies she used to get ahead academically.
Pandering to a (historically) black college, she was citing the disproportionate number of black Americans incarcerated, compared to their population percentage in America.
(Never mind that she totally ignored the disproportionate ‘offending’ rate, which explains that incarceration rate she likes to bluster about…it’s all about posturing, for her. But, “…the high percentage of blacks behind bars reflects crime rates, not bigotry.”)
An honest politician should ask that values be given more emphasis by that segment of the population which disproportionately commits more crimes, if honesty were in play.
Not in play with Fauxcohantas, sadly…honesty won’t incite the votes she’s looking for.
But, hey, black Americans…never fear – the Party of the KKK still has your back.
(Word to the wise, though…watch out for sharp objects.)
While all the talking heads are discussing how axiomatic (unquestionable) the political process is when it comes to the ruling Party losing congressional seats in mid-terms…
…one wonders if a restless electorate who chose Trump will, as well, stall that reality.
(FOLLOW-ON to our previous post)
FakeNews media outlets and partisan hacks/politicians can complain all they want about the efforts of the GOP Congress to get to the bottom of FISA/collusion-gate…
…but at the end of the day, LIKE IT OR NOT, the Justice Dept inspector general was confirmed by Congress – and that body deserves an explanation on why/how he failed.
PERIOD.
FULL.STOP.
“To detect and deter…fraud, abuse, and misconduct in DOJ programs and personnel…”
That’s the mission statement of the Justice Dept. Office of the Inspector General…
…which you would think is pretty clear – ‘detect and deter fraud, abuse, misconduct’.
So, when you read the eminent Victor Davis Hanson’s article today at National Review Online, entitled “The Police Were Not Policed”…keep that ‘clear’ mission in mind.
Mr. Hanson lays out the ‘fraud, abuse, and misconduct’ of the FBI and Justice Dept in very unambiguous and provable terms…naming the players and the offices they held.
So, though many have “resigned, retired, been reassigned, or been fired” for their various and sundry unethical or possibly illegal acts, one huge question remains…
…having failed at the clear, unambiguous mission for which he’s in office…
…why is Michael E. Horowitz STILL the Inspector General?
Obamacare was ruled constitutional when Justice Roberts saw it as a ‘tax’ since it did generate revenue…which occurred because of the individual ‘tax-penalty’ mandate…
…which was eliminated in Dec 2017 when the penalty was voided by Congress.
And, if there’s no revenue…Obamacare’s no longer a ‘tax’.
The Hill…“If Trump meeting is illegal, then Clinton dossier is criminal too“
Therein lies the rub, for the Left and its media masters.
How do you push criminality of a meeting that yielded nothing…and not push criminality of Clinton/DNC/FusionGPS/Steele host of meetings – that yielded a hoax dirt-dossier?
And still remain credible, that is…
Jonathan Turley is a rare Left-wing bid – he’s honest about his legal insight: “The media has largely ignored that Hillary Clinton and her campaign spent a huge amount of money to fund the efforts of former British spy Christopher Steele to gather dirt on Trump, including information from the Russian government and intelligence figures. All of the outcries and expressions of shock by Democratic leaders over the Trump Tower meeting ignores the more extensive contacts and efforts by the Clinton campaign.”
BINGO!!
“Facebook unfriends the Russians“
Quick – what’s the difference between allowing illegal aliens to vote, and allowing illegal aliens to influence the American electorate as a whole on Facebook?
Trick question…there’s no difference: both acts influence American elections.
Switzerland-based IMD World Competitiveness Center annual ranking says it all…
