Since when is the Supreme Court given access to foreign intelligence?

Those happy with the partial victory handed to the President on his travel ban are losing sight of the big picture – the Executive Branch has national security responsibility…

…not the Judicial Branch.

The Supreme Court should have overturned the lower courts ruling based on that premise.

But, trying to split definitives, it chose to re-write the 1952 Immigration & Nationality Act, by revising the President’s lawfully entitled prerogative of designating security risks.

Lest we forget…writing law is the Legislative Branch’s responsibility…

…not the Judicial Branch.

And settled law states:

“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

But the Supreme Court says, naah, we’re going to tweak this a little…

Got that?

They shredded your Constitution, to support a constitutional right of non-citizens.

Miscalculation or stupidity? Either way, Obama had the power…not Mr. Trump

Now don’t blame Republicans for this – it’s the Democrats harping on this ‘Russia affected the election’ meme…but, if that’s the case…do you understand what they’re admitting?

According to reports, pre-election, Barack Obama is either guilty of huge misinterpretation of all the Russian efforts…a staggering level of stupidity that includes his intel agencies…

…or glaringly narrow-minded, believing any Russian act couldn’t stop Hillary’s campaign.

Because, if he allowed the Russians free reign because they were helping Hillary, he and his intel-agency flunkies read the efforts as 180-degrees from what’s now (their) reality.

And, if Obama-&-co. thought Hillary would win regardless, it was a HUGE miscalculation (dare we to suggest, a miscalculation founded on his belief in his own omnipotence).

Whatever the reason, he had the power to do something about it…and did nothing.

So, if the media/Democrat complex is right and Russia affected the election outcome, if anyone colluded or obstructed in determining Hillary’s fate…it was Barack Obama

…not Donald Trump…because he wasn’t in control of America’s awesome capabilities.

Hopefully, the court of public opinion will force the media and Democrats, as the Party out of power, to move on to their next willful obstruction of our political system…

…which is the only strategy they seem to have.

See…there’s that ‘obstruction’ word again.

Exposing fraud isn’t ‘obstruction’…and pushing fraud ‘tells’ what Democrats are up to

“It is not obstruction to expose a false narrative.”

And that’s the only thing President Trump did, was to demand fraud be exposed.

A fraud the media/Democrat complex pushes for all they’re worth, which is indicative of a much more notable characteristic; as posted previously, the Democrats have a ‘tell’.

In poker, that’s a mannerism which will expose their hand, and for Democrats, it tells us volumes in how they attack Republicans…for what they’ve been up to all along.

The Clintons and Obama have been in collusion with Russia for a long time, most notably in their successful ($$$) efforts to help Russia acquire America’s uranium assets.

No better way to hide that collusion, than by accusing Republicans of Russian collusion.

In such a manner, if successful they not only de-legitimize Mr. Trump’s election, but also de-legitimize any investigation, going forward, of their own past questionable behavior.

And now that their ‘GOP collusion’ narrative is deflating, what better way to obstruct and deflect attention from their machinations…than by accusing Republicans of obstruction?

Naturally, their media masters are happy to push the deceitful narrative.

But, as Andrew McCarthy points out, despite a misleading sham-stream media narrative…

“It is not obstruction to expose a false narrative.”

It never fails: if you want to know what Democrats are up to…

…just look at what they falsely accuse others of doing.

The only way solar energy works is through government subsidies

An article discussing how solar panels lose efficiency when it’s hot outside also points out how a 2015 MIT study on solar acknowledges the process survives only by subsidies.

The 356-page ‘Future of Solar Energy’ report is riddled with subsidy-necessity verbiage.

Two take-aways on solar…

  • when you need it most, on hot days, it works the least effectively, and
  • IT-CAN’T-SURVIVE-WITHOUT-TAXPAYER-FUNDED-SUBSIDIES

None of us in our personal lives would, for decades, pour so much of our hard-earned cash into a project or investment that NEVER shows a possibility of becoming profitable.

Proving, after decades of doing just that, ‘green energy’ isn’t about sustainable energy…

…it’s about sustaining subsidies, for the rich who push the scam.

Anti-common sense Democrats and their anti-voter-ID perfidy

Common sense dictates as long as there are illegal aliens in the U.S., voter ID is needed.

Think tank reports are fine, but all that’s needed is logic. There are illegal aliens within our borders who willingly admit (and openly brag) to voting illegally…we need ID checks.

Arguing against logic simply shows Democrats are okay with fraudulent voting…since it seems by all statistical analysis that the recipient of illegal voting is the Democrat Party.

Ssooo…Hillary-n-Democrats colluded with Russians to undermine Hillary’s campaign

To the extent that damaging emails about Hillary and the Democrat Party were the only possible ways her campaign could be hurt, and Obama knew but did nothing about it…

…the case can be made Hillary and the Democrats are the ‘colluders’.

After all, regardless how Russia may or may not have been the ones that hacked the DNC emails of Podesta et al, the inherent damaging aspects were their own fault.

And as president, Obama let it happen, according to the Post.

Great story…when will they run with it?

WA Post story exposes Obama aiding and abetting Russian cyber efforts

A whitewash article in the Washington Post actually makes Obama look worse.

Foreign meddling in elections is endemic. Obama knew what Russia was up to, and telling the story of a ‘conflicted’ Obama ineffectually hand-wringing over attempts are pathetic.

Beyond that, failing to do anything makes Obama an accomplice.

So, what should the real headline read?

“Obama-Russian election collusion CONFIRMED!”