3 weeks before election, Obama said ‘there’s no evidence of tampering’

3 weeks before the November election, Obama ridiculed Mr. Trump, saying there were no facts or evidence of election rigging, and there was no way such a thing could be done…

…but then he (and his media/Democrat combine) changed that tune AFTER Hillary lost.

So, which is it? Is Obama a liar, or an idiot?

Was he a liar then, since it appears he ‘struggled’ with how to deal with Russian meddling, according to the latest Washington Post story, yet at the same time saying ‘no evidence’?

Or was he an idiot then, not knowing (or understanding) what his intelligence agencies were dealing with even as he claimed ‘no facts’ and ‘no evidence’ of election meddling?

Because, if reporting is accurate and investigations were ongoing, he’s one or the other.

More importantly, Obama labelled himself and Democrats ‘UnAmerican’, because he said during those same remarks (referring to a post-election peaceful transfer of power)…

“One way of weakening America, making it less great, is if you start betraying those basic American traditions that have been bipartisan, and have helped hold together this democracy now for well over two centuries.”

Mr. Obama, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Schumer, Mrs. Clinton…

…your post-election acts betrayed that tradition – YOU ARE UNAMERICAN…

…as defined by Obama himself.

Yep…by Obama standards, Democrats ‘don’t have what it takes to be in their jobs’

“…if whenever things are going badly for you and you lose, you start blaming somebody else, then YOU DON’T HAVE WHAT IT TAKES to be in this job…”

Can you believe Obama attacked Hillary, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer that hard?

Okay, okay…he was talking about Trump pre-election – but the concept holds true.

Things went badly…

…they lost…

…they blame somebody else…

…so, by Obama standardsthey don’t have what it takes to do the job.

Right?

Sham-stream media trolling the junkyards of humanity

Desperate times demand desperate measures for the sham-stream media.

They’ve chosen trolling the junkyards of humanity with the rancid meat of fake news.

It’s time to put the NY Times and Washington Post in the tabloid racks up there at the checkout line of the supermarkets, right beside the National Enquirer and Star.

They made the choice of pushing fake news in a desperate bid to re-build their customer base – we would have suggested trying the ‘honest journalism’ route, but, oh well.

For TV journalism, we can relegate the ABC-CBS-NBC-CNN networks to tabloid status, as they’ve gone down the same trail; honest viewers will take note and turn them off…

…leaving the junkyard of humanity slavering after trolled rancid meat that is fake news.

After all, an opposition with integrity does at least demand factual reporting…

…one hopes.

Obama disses Democrats…if you take his Oct 2016 speech seriously

Pre-election, Obama admonished then-campaigner Donald Trump on his alluding to the upcoming November election as potentially being ‘rigged’ for Hillary.

Scoffing at such a thought, Obama stated that such an impossible suggestion ‘doesn’t show the kind of leadership and toughness we want in a president’…

…so, it must also be true AFTER the election, and applied to Democrat whiners now.

So why not ask the CBO to score Obamacare in its present state?

Heard a great idea this morning…have the CBO rescore Obamacare as it is now.

Half of subscribers predicted, heavily weighted with signups of the sickest members, and exchange insurance companies dropping out at a sickening pace…scary results.

Can’t even imagine that score being higher than the GOP alternative…

predicated, of course, on how many deep-staters are in the CBO.

In the meantime, while a media/Democrat combine wails ‘millions will lose healthcare’, they ignore the fact that the CBO bases their estimate on wildly incorrect factoring.

But don’t take our word for it, IBD has a health expert’s insight into CBO pipe-dreams.

Let’s face it, when you designate a healthy male not choosing maternity benefits or a young healthy 25 year-old foregoing insurance, as ‘loss of coverage’…it’s problematic.

Predicting a crazy 50% increase in Obamacare signups, to compare against a miserably pessimism-scored GOP plan, and call the net minus ‘loss of coverage’…is disingenuous.

But this is what we deal with, when anti-GOP deep-staters are carving out the news…

…(and scoring health plans.)

Don’t believe the ‘cuts to Medicaid’ lies from those attacking the GOP plan

The Senate plan does not cut Medicaid, despite Democrat hysteria to the contrary.

What Democrats rush to call a cut is just a lesser increase of spending than they want.

And while we’re at it, how can they get away with claiming more Americans will die with the GOP plan in effect, while ignoring the drop in life expectancy during Obamacare?

Getting tired of a lazy opposition party offering lies instead of ideas.