Asked during the Democrat debate who her enemies were in the political realm, she said drug and health-insurance companies…but a look at Hillary’s donors tells a different story.

She broke records for donations from those industries in 2006 and 2008.

As the Washington Examiner notes “Among her biggest bundlers are lobbyists for drugmakers and health insurers.”

Hillary’s motto? Keep your friends close…and your enemie$ in your pocket.

(Will someone please tell Republicans, so they can push back hard on these lies?)

Anyone who questions the legitimacy of this Benghazi hearing should read the headline:

“State Dept. delivers Stevens emails, Benghazi documents”

3 YEARS AFTER the Benghazi disaster, ‘new’ emails are just now given to Congress…

…yet some still try to imply the investigation is old news?

A leading expert on the effect of open- and concealed-carry gun laws has just written another article on the faulty reasoning that gun-control activists use to push their issue.

They think America as a nation should be a mass gun-free zone.

But it shouldn’t take a 1600-word article to drive home the point that…

…mass-murderers want maximum effect, and gun-free zones provide them with the perfect opportunity to achieve their heinous goal.

(There – we just did it in 20 words.)

Gun-free zones…for the evil-intentioned…are, in reality…

…mass Killing Zones.

(Better, down to 13.)

Gun-free zones + evil-intentioned = mass Killing Zones.

(Now 8…this is fun.)

Trump’s making news claiming he could have prevented 9/11 if he’d been president.

If nothing else, Donald Trump is the King of Hindsight-land.

Little exposes bluster more easily than an ‘I could have done better’ post-event mantra….

…but even if Trump did have 9/11 goggles on before that tragic day, it wouldn’t have cured the small  detail of having to work with a Cabinet that a Democrat Senate delayed.

Angry about W’s win over Gore, the Democrat-controlled Senate held up many Cabinet post appointments George W needed in order to get gov’t departments running smoothly.

(So Bush’s appointees didn’t get confirmed until a month or two before Sept 11, 2010. And thus, an argument could be made that Clinton-era gov’t agencies failed Americans.)

In the final analysis, it’s just as easy to say’ W could have run Trump’s companies better and avoided 3-4 bankruptcies’ as it is to say Trump could have avoided 9/11…

…neither can be proven.

But then, as with Obama…for Democrats, Trump doesn’t need proof to bash W.

For weeks the Democrats have been psyching out congressional Republicans on the Benghazi hearing committee, by whining the hearing is used to attack Hillary.

Sadly, history tells us Republicans will fall over themselves to prove it ain’t so.

She deserves the third degree, but it’s likely the whining has proved effective.

After yet another rant about how Republicans will no longer fight back against the Democrat horde, one can only wonder if the cause is…he who rants.

Rush Limbaugh fights a daily battle against Democrat policies hurting our Nation.

He has a huge following…and it begs the question.

Does the fact he’s out there battling every day make Republicans think they don’t have to join in…they can just use Rush for cover, and keep their heads down?

Just askin’.

The inevitable Democrat apologists whine, using the inevitable Bill Clinton line…

…’but, Glass-Steagall had become less and less effective, made no difference.’

Well, during a blizzard there’s a difference between cracking a window for fresh air, and throwing the door wide open…repealing Glass-Steagall removed the door…

…after Bill Clinton’s administration pulled the hinges, by using the Federal Reserve to issue waivers to big banks, obscuring the line between securities and banking.

Bloomberg tries to run cover for Hillary, claiming the law’s repeal wasn’t a final factor even while confessing that Slick Willy’s Federal Reserve was removing its hinges.

And laws rendered ineffective by non-enforcement doesn’t excuse their repeal.

Unless…of course…you’re a Democrat…

…or their enablers.

For 7 years of Obama’s reign, Democrats have blamed ‘W’ for the economy.

But during the Tuesday night debate, they let the cat out of the bag, admitting the subprime crisis that crashed our economy was caused by their actions.

Magic words? Glass-Steagall.

A law from the ’30s regulated banking, keeping commercial lending and securities ventures separate. Bill Clinton repealed it in ’99, setting the table for crisis since his Attorney General had pressured banks to make bad mortgage loans to minorities, in that they couldn’t require the level of collateral normally associated with such loans.

Unsecured loans of such magnitude created a huge financial risk for banks.

But, after repeal, when banks were allowed into the securities arena, they created shady investment packages that hid risky sub-prime mortgage loans within. Pushing the ‘securities’ off on other financial institutions offset the financial risk, but was akin to Typhoid Mary handing out granola bars at school lunch…all the ‘kids’ got sick.

(In other words…Wall Street crashed.)

At Tuesday’s debate (a little past halfway) O’Malley and Sanders directly connected that crash to the ’99 repeal of the law that would have prevented such disaster.

Now, the Democrat media is trying to stuff the manure back into the cow, but when you have Democrat presidential candidates admitting heretofore unspoken reality…

…that’s a lot of manure.

But just when you thought it couldn’t get any deeper, Hillary Clinton jumps in talking about how income inequality “hasn’t been this bad since the 1920s”…

…then just one sentence later making a totally contradictory comment that “…the economy does better when you have a Democrat in the White House.”

Does she think Americans are so stupid as to believe Obama’s a Republican?

Sure, gush over Hillary…but you lapdog media have a lot of glossing over ahead.

What honest Democrat gets elected if they admit poverty is a good thing?

Not many, right? But that’s what they need, to continue getting elected.

An IBD article notes that Census Data proves there’s a 98% chance of breaking out of poverty by doing three simple (but very impactful) things:

• graduate high school;
• work full-time;
• wait until 21 and get married before having kids.

We would add a fourth…don’t let the Democrats know that plan’s being followed.

(Because statistics reveal those escaping poverty shed the Democrat Party.)

Welfare destroys traditional family structure and creates single-parent households, in turn causing the stresses that result in high school drop-outs and teenage moms.

Proof? Look at 2-parent black family statistics before welfare’s creation in the ’60s.

Welfare? Democrats have taken ‘kill them with kindness’ to a whole new level.

Why do politicians need reminding? Lawbreakers don’t care about the law.

Until someone can explain a law that would have stopped Umpqua or Sandy Hook, any push for ‘gun control’ is better characterized as puerile political posturing…

…or veiling the real purpose – to remove ALL guns from civil society in America.

(And that means creating even more potential victims of gun violence…not less.)

Adam Lanza broke a dozen laws that day, before his mass-killing of schoolchildren.

Lawbreakers don’t care about the law.

Ironically, the Nation’s leading lawbreaker – Hillary Clinton – suggests otherwise.