Has everyone forgotten who Hillary reported to as Secretary of State?

Isn’t it odd…no one in the media seems to have noticed a curious lack of ‘TO: Barack Obama’ emails in Hillary’s private communications fiasco?

But then, who would expect her to actually report to her boss?

Yeah, yeah…nothing to see here…move along.

Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses on religious grounds, even after a court-ordered mandate to do so.

The judge threw her in jail, saying people ‘can’t choose which orders to follow’.

But if that’s true, how is it that Obama’s walking around loose?

He refuses to allow his Justice Department to support the Defense of Marriage law, and refuses to enforce immigration law, just to name a few of his unlawful ‘choices’.

Based on this judge’s logic, Barack Obama should be in the next cell…

…but we won’t hold our breath.

And for those who fall back on the ‘hey, she took an oath’ logic, we would suggest Obama did also…but Kim Davis’s oath was taken before laws were changed.

(Technically, then, she’s still following the oath she took.)

And don’t get us started on Hillary’s Secretary-of-State oath violations. Clinton’s still walking free…maybe Kim Davis should ask to borrow her lawyer?

In the meantime, how do we get Clinton and Obama in front of this judge?

‘Cuz we’d love to see the ‘you can’t choose which laws to obey’ logic applied…

…equally.

Clinton’s private server techie plans to take the 5th testifying before Congress.

The GOP-led committees should give him immunity, thus negating that need.

The tech guy isn’t the one who broke an oath of office – Hillary Clinton did.

Give him immunity; if he still pleads the 5th, you’ll know Clinton bought him.

Obama’s in Alaska hyping the urgency of global warming.

What does it say about one’s credibility, using a summer day to mourn a glacier’s melt, unless of course you feel it inaccurate to believe glaciers melt during summer?

Remember ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse’?

Evidently Hillary doesn’t. (Nor any other Democrats, for that matter.)

Funny, as a lawyer you’d think she knows that.

Incredibly, now the State Dept runs interference for Hillary by claiming ‘stupid’.

They say there’s ‘no way to know’ if emails should’ve been classified at the time.

Here’s a random thought…

…ASK THE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, MORONS!!

(And, can anyone advise… why is the State Department, that’s just as much a part of this ongoing, all-enveloping scandal, doing the analyzing?)

The U.S. has about 1950 miles of border with Mexico, approx 650 already walled.

Of the remaining border that needs to be fenced, it sounds a lot harder than it is.

Say 1500 miles remain to be fenced. Break it down into 15 units of 100-miles each and put those units up to bid, awarding 7 to union shops, 8 to non-union shops.

Offer performance bonuses for early completion, and let the game begin.

Report – Senate Democrats have lined up enough support for Obama’s Iran deal…

…proving once again, ‘stupid is as stupid does’.

Understand, this report is about the Senate 1) voting to reject Obama’s deal, which 2) forces Obama to veto it, which then 3) forces a failed Senate override vote…

…and NONE of this has happened yet.

So all this pre-vote posturing is…posturing – presumably to see if the GOP will blink.

Given the Obama-Iran deal exposed weaknesses, everything possible should be done to neutralize it (and, last resort, individual states can enforce sanctions).

But if GOP Senators have any courage left there’s one position they must take…

Force the Democrats’ hand: 10 of their senators are up for re-election in 2016 (several plan to retire, among them Mikulski, who just gave the Iran deal support).

Make them stand with Obama, and try justifying their vote to cave to Iran. America’s national security is at stake…this is one issue the GOP can’t ignore, or avoid.

And there’s little reason for them not to fight hard against this deal. Swing states strongly oppose the Iran deal…those states are critical in national elections. Yes, Americans see this as a bad deal…and, thus, a critical issue for 2016 elections.

Man up, Republicans. Your much-derided Corker bill may yet prove a winner.

Reject Obama’s Iran deal…send that rejection to Obama, force him to veto it…then make Democrats support Obama’s veto when the Senate votes to override it. You get two opportunities to expose Democrats for the nat’l security failures they are.

And watch the fallout when the 2016 pre-election political games play out.

Call the Democrats’ bluff – let’s see how many really think a nuclear Iran is okay…

…just months before a national election.