The illogical nature of legislation ‘fixes’ to void Obamacare pitfalls

Suffering through yet another article on proposed legislation that would protect the GOP from a Supreme Court ruling on O-care subsidies, one can only wonder…

(…with apologies to Jeffrey Anderson, whom we admire greatly…)

…what motivation would Democrats have to help the GOP avoid image disasters?

N-O-N-E. ZERO. ZILCH. N-A-D-A.

So, what good does any legislation short of full-blown Obamacare repeal do…

…when no Republican legislation will get past an Obama veto anyway?

Sure, Senator Sasse’s bill would inoculate Republican governors…

…but when did Obama indicate any inclination to favor such an alien concept?

Democrats wrote bad law, then broke the bad law, and Republicans will get blamed when they try to hold Democrat politicians accountable for any part of it.

THAT’S WHY DEMOCRATS DID IT THAT WAY.

If Republican legislation will be vetoed anyway, why not ‘repeal’ legislation?

Just askin’?

WAIT – Hillary Clinton is asking…Hillary Clinton…to release her State Dept emails…?

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a private email account while she was conducting government business…through a home server she set up.

In the inevitable uproar, Clinton now asks the State Dept to release emails.

Never mind the illegalities of using private email for govt business…

…look past the HUGE national security problem a home server entails.

How revealing will any private emails be…

…that she selectively turned over to the State Dept in the first place?

Just sayin’…

7 million reasons why Democrat executive-action amnesty is bad for America

The U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Svcs said they processed 7 million applications just last year, granting amnesty without holding face-to-face interviews…

…and WITHOUT doing even an FBI name- (thus, background-) check.

Does any reasonable American think blind amnesty is a good thing?

(We won’t even go into why Breitbart thought the number deserved the headline.)

Any criminal or terror-related act that occurs as a result of such error-fraught policy lies squarely on the heads of Obama and Democrats who supported his action.

The poster-boy of ‘ignoring the obvious’…

Obama shrugged off Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech to Congress as ‘lacking alternatives’ in the matter of Iran’s path toward nuclear capability.

But, if ‘demanding that Iran “act like a normal country” before treating it like one’ doesn’t qualify as a viable alternative…

…if a call to nations to “stand together to stop Iran’s march of conquest, subjugation and terror” doesn’t qualify as a viable alternative…

…what in God’s name does?

In the Middle East, and globally, Iran has shown time and again it’s the bad actor in this matter…so, Mr. Obama, simply trusting they’ll change isn’t a good ‘alternative’.

In a classic example of diametrically opposed national philosophy, Israel’s PM said America’s Constitution “…promises life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Iran’s founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad

And he finished with a simple declaration that, before lifting restrictions against Iran, that state must do 3 things: stop its aggression against Middle East neighbors, stop it’s support of global terrorism, and stop threatening Israel’s annihilation.

Lacking alternatives? Not really.

Unless you’re living in Barack Obama’s world…of Oblivion.

Republican leadership just negated argument against a 3rd Party solution…

The GOP caving on amnesty seems illogical, considering anti-amnesty was a main driver helping Republicans retake the Congress in 2014 midterm elections.

With such an overwhelming voter mandate, many find yesterday’s GOP leadership cowardice incomprehensible…why did they cave to Democrats?

Many reasons have been suggested, but one is never mentioned…

…old-fashioned blackmail. Politicians aren’t choirboys (ask Bill Clinton).

So it could be the opposition has dirt on the GOP leadership.

Add that to the dozen-or-so other reasons Republican leaders have no guts.

But, whatever the reason, Boehner & McConnell, by their action, have (ironically) made the BEST argument so far to justify a 3rd Party solution for America.

After all, what harm is an Emperor Obama with no clothes

…when there’s a Congress…with no principle?

Heard the one about the Jewish suicide-bomber…?

…neither have we.

As a petulant Poser in the White House whines about his petty protocol, the Prime Minister of Israel worries about a suicidal terror-state going nuclear on his country.

(And Deroy Murdock makes a great point…Obama doesn’t consult Congress when he wants to skirt the law…he should be familiar with the ‘evasion’ concept.)

BlueCollar suggests Netanyahu has the edge in any ‘concern-meter’ standings.

Let Us Be Clear…Israel’s survival trumps Obama’s feelings.

PERIOD. FULL STOP.

Unhhh…terrorists will keep on killing, so why try to stop them from getting BETTER at it…?

Obama’s UN ambassador now justifies allowing the world’s most active terror-state to acquire nuclear capabilities, saying it’s not achievable or realistic to stop them.

By that logic, why try to stop LA street gangs from acquiring .50-cal chainguns? Why try to stop Mexican drug cartels from getting Hellfire missiles?

Short answer…because Evil cannot be allowed to get MORE LETHAL.

Can it be Obama’s team just admitted they’re not up to it, or W did the impossible?

Hint: why doesn’t Obama call former President George W Bush, and ask for help? W can give him pointers…on how he convinced Libya to forego nuclear efforts.

Msg. to Obama…the first step to recovery is admitting there’s a problem.

Seems UN Amb. Susan Rice just did that for him.

Only an Obamacrat sees losing 33% of a year’s pay as a ‘Success Story’

Obamacare…the Democrat gift that keeps on taking.

Gushing over the Bronze plan, HHS Secretary Burwell reveals the Liberal mindset.

But Investor’s Business Daily crunched the numbers on the ‘Success Story’ of hers, and the example Burwell used gets UGLY if that family incurs any serious illness.

Seems that family of four with $38.3k annual income faces a $12,600 deductible.

Only a Liberal can see a potential loss of 1/3 of a years pay as a ‘success story’.