If it really is ‘time to reject language & rhetoric that excites/inspires racist radicals’ the Left would be out of work

Hysteria continues…apace.

But it’s not about mass shootings, it’s about hamstringing Republicans for 2020.

Our previous blog noted 51% of mass shootings were carried out by blacks, yet every focus by the media and their Democrat lap-dog politicians is on ‘white supremacists’?

The deliberate effort to keep that focus, despite evidence to the contrary, is all anyone needs to know: 2020 can’t be about economic gains, job growth, or personal wellbeing. There’s nothing for them to ride, except their ‘hate-mongering racist’ horse falsehood.

(Remember, Obama’s ‘it’s a new normal? Jobs won’t be back? Magic wand economy? How can any Democrat running in 2020 dodge Pres Trump’s Magic-Wand economy?)

Julie Kelly, at AmericanGreatness, sees it the same way: The anti-Trump forces, now stripped of their Russian collusion ammunition, have invented another imaginary threat they hope to weaponize against the president: The public menace posed by “white supremacist” terrorism. Much like the collusion conspiracy theory—which relied on random incidents, fictional villains, unconvincing evidence, and the Bad Orange Man in the White House—there is little substance to this purported danger…the political agenda behind this manufactured white supremacy crisis is equally sinister because its specific purpose is to influence and undermine the 2020 elections.” (bold, u/l added)

Ignoring and or obscuring facts is all they have, and such activity proves their true intent is to ‘influence and undermine’ the national election in 2020 specifically: “The “white supremacy” canard is intended to further demonize Trump; falsely defame his supporters as white supremacists; and pressure nervous voters into defeating Trump and Republican candidates next year. The strategy is as cynical as it is pernicious.”

It’s time to address the issue head-on.

Trying to shut down Republicans by saying that “it’s time to reject the public language and rhetoric that excites and inspires racist radicals” by disingenuously implying that its a Republican tactic, when it’s really a Democrat tactic, isn’t helpful to the discussion…

…unless the real objective is reinstating Democrat power in 2020.

In which case, sorry Chicagotoo bad, Baltimore…it’s not about solving your problem.

Julie sums it up precisely, and with devastating accuracy: “…while the Trump haters scream at shadows and unleash the dogs of war, the real danger – how we address the mental, emotional and social defects in a generation of isolated young men – will be ignored just so #TheResistance can move poll numbers before November 2020…inner cities will continue to burn as urban violence destroys families and neighborhoods. The opioid epidemic, a true systemic threat to domestic tranquility, will rage throughout blighted communities unabated. Just like Russian collusion, our ruling class will busy themselves chasing apocryphal demons while America’s legitimate problems go unresolved. Who, exactly, are the real political terrorists in this scenario?”

WHO, INDEED?

The choice is stark for the black community: continue to embrace race-card victimology that keeps them imprisoned…or accept realities of Trump’s black-advancement policies.

Nov. 2020, they must choose wisely…WHAT.HAVE.THEY.GOT.TO.LOSE?

Mass Shootings? If percentages mean ANYTHING…

At the risk of being branded ‘racist’, we pass on the following:

“51% of Mass Shooters in 2019 Were Black: Only 29% Were White”

Does the Left really want to have this conversation? “White people make up 61% of the country’s population, followed by Hispanics at 17.8%, and African-Americans at 12.7%. In that context, white people are actually dramatically underrepresented among mass shooters, as are Latinos, while African-Americans are highly overrepresented.”

After all, to address a problem, we need to know the facts behind the problem…

…RIGHT?

Avoiding the fact that “51% of Mass Shooters in 2019 Were Blackwould be racist.

Does the Left REALLY want us to ‘do something’?

Okay, let’s talk…

You can’t blame white supremacists for Chicago & Baltimore…

(Thank you, HeyJackass.com)

Chicago killings, year-to-date: 278

Chicago shot, wounded year-to-date: 1365

Chicago total homicides year-to-date: 305

At Breitbart.com: “As of July 28, the Sun’s counter shows 191 Baltimore homicides for 2019, which means the city is well on its way to surpassing 300 homicides for the year.”

These cities are run by Democrats, and have been for decades.

QUESTION – why the hysteria over unfortunate-but-infrequent white mass shootings, but no hysteria or demands for action regarding DAILY outrages within these cities?

(But then, wasn’t it Obama who suggested bringing guns to a knife fight? And, you know, even if “they” don’t bring knives…what the hey, you’ve got your gun…RIGHT?)

The question of retiring Republican congressmen misses a possible cause…

At the AmericanThinker.com, there’s an interesting article on the possible cause for all these Republican congressmen announcing retirements prior to the next election.

“There actually are three possible hypotheses that explain, single or combined, this phenomenon:

-(a) Republicans fear losing the majority in their own chamber of the Congress,

-(b) Republicans prefer to avoid a tough re-election, and 

-(c) Republicans are not aligned with the direction President Trump has imposed on the party.”

In the aftermath of abusive federal agency intelligence activities by deep-state actors, we suggest a fourth possible hypothesis could very well exist: dirt-info blackmail.

Deepstaters in the FBI, CIA, DoJ, and NSA have demonstrated that they are not above illegally gathering data which could provide ammunition necessary to force retirements.

We’re convinced that fourth possibility played a role in the 2018 election, where a large number of GOP lawmakers announced retirements…and Democrats took the House.

(A big indicator would be targeted retirements in once-strong GOP states: i.e, Texas.)

El Paso shooter’s views pre-dated Trump…will Democrats blame O’ now?

Reports say the El Paso shooter had written manifestos prior to Trump’s election.

Democrats quick to blame the President before this came out must now be trying to think of how to avoid blaming Obama…live by the hate-card, die by the hate-card.

No doubt they’ll figure some way to spin it back at President Trump, regardless.

(His last manifesto ‘Inconvenient Truth’ is a riff off Al Gore…why isn’t he blamed?)

For two years we’ve noted that the ‘alt-Right’ white supremacist groups have Left-wing leaders, and there’s little doubt that Leftie billionaires are funding these hate acts.

The Justice Dept. must task a Domestic Terror investigation to go after the funders.

There’s no doubt these acts were horrendous, but why does the Left seize only those periodic, random acts to rant against…while Chicago’s weekly shootings are ignored?

(This last weekend saw 7 dead and 46 wounded in Chicago…while media yawns.)

Fear-mongering racists shamelessly continue their racist fear-mongering

Democrat elitists don’t care how low they go in order to regain the White House.

Calling for impeachment because of a wacko white nationalist killing spree is a ridiculous but predictable tactic by the Left. Illogical nonsense is their m.o.

Equating secure-borders efforts with an unhinged murderous racist attack is deceitful…

…especially when you consider Obama’s loathsome attacks against police officers arguably prompted assassinations…yet no Republican called for his impeachment.

Absolutely despicable Democrat behavior, but then…that’s how they roll.

Prediction: both El Paso & Dayton shooters will be linked to Antifa.

Which lays the blame squarely where it belongs…on Democrat hate rhetoric.

Ego-vs-Pragmatism…’surprise’ Michelle O’ candidacy may hinge on economy

Blue-collar predicted months ago that Michelle Obama would jump in as a late-term candidate in 2020, but a still-strong Trump economy just could be a spoiler.

She has the ego, but pragmatism may rear its ugly head…a strong economy, especially in critical districts, could heavily tilt the playing field in President Trump’s favor.

Facing that potential, with her ego, she may choose to wait until 2024.

Why fight (and maybe lose) a close race, when a ‘change’ message means ‘downturn’?