What Roger Stone did was take (already public) statements from WikiLeaks as to what they did have on Democrats, and dire predictions on more information to come…

…and bluff Democrats about it, to yank their chain.

Then, when his punking and posturing against Democrats based on publicly known info drew attention to him from Congress, he lied to that body about if he texted or emailed.

Got that? Byron York laid that all out for us over a year ago, January 2019. Yep. The Mueller indictment against Stone was based purely on perjury traps, not collusion.

All charges were simply about claiming he hadn’t texted or emailed public knowledge, and clownish attempts to obscure or hide his lack of candor about his communications.

Nothing threatened nat’l security…like Hillary’s hackable (& hacked) classified emails.

Nothing involved colluding with foreigners…like the DNC and Hillary’s campaign.

Nothing constituted cover-up coup attempts…like Brennan, Clapper, and Comey.

Those actually threatened America, it’s election process, and was actual sedition.

They all lied about their actions…to Congress, to the FBI, to the President, and to us.

To this day, none of them have been indicted….let alone convicted or sentenced.

But, yeah, Roger Stone’s a bad guy. Roger Stone deserves an orange jumpsuit.

Politics? You bet. But hey, don’t like that glimpse of reality?

Here’s an idea that could neutralize that analysis…

…apply their same ‘Roger Stone’ standard to Hillary, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, etc.

You Democrats okay with that?

Remember our Constitution’s ‘equal protection under the law’ clause? (14th Am)

Cambridge doesn’t, according to the Washington Examiner: “Illegal immigrants in Massachusetts city won’t be arrested if they drive without a license”

So, unlicensed driving American citizens can still be arrested…but not illegals.

Amazing. Harvard purportedly is one of the most prestigious law schools in the United States, and relentlessly turns out ‘Constitutional’ scholars year after year…and yet…

…the city within which it resides just turned our Constitution upside down.

LET.

THAT.

SINK.

IN.

As reported by the National Sentinel: “As Trump delivers on promise to provide California farmers with more water, Gov. Newsom vows to protect…fish”

“Calling California’s Democrat-established and Democrat-controlled water policies a “disgrace,” the president signed a memorandum directing the secretaries of the Interior and Commerce departments to implement new policies that make more water available for the state’s multi-billion dollar farming industry (that feeds the country).”

“Meanwhile, Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state’s Democratic leaders have vowed to sue the government over the president’s directive because they’re more concerned with protecting endangered fish. Prior to Trump’s signing, he vowed to ‘file legal action in the coming days … to protect highly imperiled fish species close to extinction.'”

Got that?

Chinese ag products are now suspect, California’s ag products are essential to our livelihood now more than ever…and the Governor’s worried about endangered fish.

Is there a more teachable example of how Democrats feel about Americans?

The first question worth asking of the eventual Democrat nominee at 2020 debates.

Last night’s debate was too painful to watch, but interesting to note in the reporting that, true to form, the Democrat candidates attacked each other instead of presenting ideas.

Tragic, what this Party has become.

As an add-on to our earlier post of Obama lying about his role in the Trump economy we pose the question…’cuz that’s the equivalent of his silly ‘Recovery Act’ claim.

We’re getting blowback for calling him a liar, but his snide comments when questioned that the ‘Recovery Act’ didn’t work clearly indicated he knew it didn’t work, then.

The reason why is simple.

As this Federalist article notes, for the government to ‘invest’ money into our economy, they must remove it from our economy (taxes)…nothing Obama says changes that.

The article equates it to removing a gallon of water from one end of the swimming pool (taxation/regulatory fees) and then dumping it BACK in at the other end (invest)…

…water levels don’t rise beyond where it was before it was taken out.

A 4th grader knows that: a college grad like Obama should. To imply otherwise is a LIE.

Yet here he is, claiming his ‘Recovery Act’ set the Trump economy table. It’s a LIE.

And, based on video evidence then…he knows it.

We call them the way we see them.

Class dismissed.

Our agricultural industry in mid-state California has been strangled due to the Democrat policies that left them high and dry; will that change if China’s ag products are stalled?

(Seems Americans are suddenly Corona-virus leery of any products from China now.)

Just sayin’…

How tragic is this: a Democrat has to argue against Trump’s historic-low black jobless numbers by falling back on full employment numbers when blacks were slaves?

“…Clyburn rips Trump’s jobs numbers: ‘We were fully employed during slavery'”

Democrats controlled the South, and perpetuated the evils of slavery. We’re confused…

…as a Black American, is he praising Democrats for slavery-induced full employment?

‘Cuz, guess what, Mr. Clyburn? When it comes to slavery…

…DEMOCRATS BUILT THAT!!

We’re confused…

…is Clyburn pining for a return to full black employment by reinstating slavery?

“Mike Bloomberg says health care will bankrupt us unless we deny it to the elderly.”

Who in their right mind believes Bloomberg et al would subject themselves to the type of healthcare death panels they’re willing to inflict on all of us other Americans?

Anyone?

Anyone?

Those Trump supporters who wish he would stop Tweeting are wrong to do so.

94%+ negative media press coverage, and its duplicitous media silence on key issues are the primary justification for President Trump to continue his Tweet presence.

Think about it…

• Many still don’t know the Mueller report found NO GOP-Russia collusion;
• Many don’t know the Americans indicted were perjury-crime traps, not collusion;
• Many are still unaware Democrats DID collude with foreign agents in 2016;
• Many don’t know Democrats funded the unsubstantiated Steele dirt dossier;
• Many oblivious about the FBI deceiving FISA courts 17 times to spy on Trump;
• Many don’t realize (or care) Democrat-Ukraine corruption was in the billions;
• Many unaware of the fact that those billions were American tax dollars;
• Many don’t know the SHAMpeachment had no justifiable foundation, because;
• Many still think it’s okay to impeach a President for doing his job;
• Many unaware (or don’t care) about PROVABLE lies told by Democrats, toadies;
  • Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Kerry (more, too numerous to link)
  • Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Rice, McCabe, Rosenstein, Lynch (etc)
• Many STILL don’t realize (or care) that Hillary broke numerous federal laws;
• Many still believe Pres. Trump’s a racist because of Charlottesville lies;

…we could go on, but you get the picture: absent social media, he’d be toast. The ironic twist is that, with Trump tweaking them on social media, their outrage goes ballistic…

…and then the truth comes out as everyone talks about it.

Social media is his primary defense against their relentless negativity.

General Flynn, as the President’s incoming Nat’l Security Adviser, was vilified for meeting with a Russian representative, and charged with resulting process crimes.

Democrat Senator Murphy, and John Kerry, an OUT-OF-OFFICE Democrat, met with foreign nation (Iran) representatives to undermine current administration goals.

Got that? Flynn was on the incoming administration team…Democrats are NOT.

Flynn was putting forth incoming administration policy…Democrats are subverting it.

How can media or Democrats say these two events are even remotely equivalent?

(Updated: earlier edition referred to Murphy as a congressman)