Attention: Obama, Clinton, Lynch, Comey, Brennan, McCabe, Clapper, Strzok, Page, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, Washington Post, NY Times, Soros, Steyer, Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Cummings, Schumer, Swalwell, Warner et al…

18 U.S. Code § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

Millennials (loosely defined as a voter group born between 1982 and 2002) really like the idea of Free College and Free Healthcare…even if it’s impossible to achieve.

Logic and reason tells an HONEST voter that the added cost of these 2 ‘Free’ benefits would be (annually) $2.1 TRILLION, based on the most generous estimates available.

Estimates for total federal tax revenues in 2020 are only $3.643 trillion. Reasonable voters know politicians are making false promises – that 2.1tn more is unattainable.

But those Democrat politicians will say anything…to get the Millennial vote.

A smart Millennial would ask deceitful Democrats why they expect support from the ‘young vote’, when such a lying Democrat premise is based on hopes that youth is…

…STUPID.

But then…we did note that would take a smart Millennial.

How many of those are out there?

But wait, some say…trying to convince Millennials by arguing against unattainable and deceitful Democrat promises mathematically is always a losing proposition.

Why not start it off by telling Millennials that Democrats think they’re dumb?

At the Politico.com: “Democrats demand Barr testify ‘not in a month … but now'”

Sub-headline: “They want the attorney general to explain his decision to release a summary of Robert Mueller’s conclusions without also unveiling the full report.”

As noted in a previous text, Democrats passed legislation (to veil Ken Starr’s report on Bill Clinton’s shenanigans) in the ’90’s, mandating certain information that would be found in a special counsel report, especially grand jury-related, be kept confidential.

So, now, what amounts to a room-full of lawyers that make up the Democrat House members ‘demand’ an explanation of why the law Democrats passed is being upheld?

The clown show continues…apace.

At the RedState.com website: “HOLY COW: Soros-Funded Group Paid $3.8 M To Fusion GPS-Linked Firms To Keep Russia Collusion Stories In The News“

(As if we didn’t know by now Lefty billionaires were behind all this unrest.)

Is the American electorate okay with this back-room instigating?

Really?

So, it’s okay to kill them in the womb…but…

…if they escape that death sentence, dammit, leave their athletic funding alone.

Short version: ok to kill the baby, but not okay to kill the funding.

You can’t make this stuff up.

Liberals howling over a BCP suggestion to subcontract with Guatemala for the service of halting illegal migrant caravans would be advised to refer to the Charter of the OAS.

The Organization of American States charter is being violated by member nations.

“The Organization was established in order to achieve among its member states—as stipulated in Article 1 of the Charter—’an order of peace and justice, to promote their solidarity, to strengthen their collaboration, and to defend their sovereignty, their territorial integrity, and their independence.'”

The Charter signed as a treaty (A-56) by the US reads (in part):

PROTOCOL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER OF THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (A-56) “PROTOCOL OF WASHINGTON”    

ARTICLE II

The texts of the following articles of the Charter of the Organization of American States are amended to read as follows:

Article 2

The Organization of American States, in order to put into practice the principles on which it is founded and to fulfill its regional obligations under the Charter of the United Nations, proclaims the following essential purposes:

a) To strengthen the peace and security of the continent;

b) To promote and consolidate representative democracy, with due respect for the principle of nonintervention;

c) To prevent possible causes of difficulties and to ensure the pacific settlement of disputes that may arise among the Member States;

d) To provide for common action on the part of those States in the event of aggression;

e) To seek the solution of political, juridical, and economic problems that may arise among them;

f) To promote, by cooperative action, their economic, social, and cultural development;

g) To eradicate extreme poverty, which constitutes an obstacle to the full democratic development of the peoples of the hemisphere; and

h) To achieve an effective limitation of conventional weapons that will make it possible to devote the largest amount of resources to the economic and social development of the Member States.

Member nations, failing to follow the above agreed-upon principles, violate the Charter.

PERIOD.

FULL.STOP.

The U.S., by attempting to halt illegal migrant caravans, would be upholding principles.

The illegal immigration problem doesn’t start when illegal aliens hit our southern border, the problem starts when they begin their migrant trek from Central & South America.

Mexico, by failing to stop entrance through their southern border, enables the invasion.

Fine.

If Mexico won’t help, why not subcontract with Guatemala, the nation south of them, to help us in that effort? The southern Guatemalan border will be much easier to control, their economy would get a huge boost, and millions of Guatemalans would benefit.

The U.S. could provide advisors and NGOs (non-gov’t organizations) to assist them.

Why not?

We’ve spent $91bn on aid to Puerto Rico, after one hurricane. The annual Guatemalan economy is reportedly $137bn…chump change considering the savings that would occur if we were able to achieve a solution that stops the cost of illegal immigration.

And, in addition…

This solution gives us leverage with Mexico, helps the Guatemalan economy, stops the trafficking of children and sex-slavery, and halts thousands of assaults on the innocents.

Just sayin’.

Puerto Rico politicians (Democrats…need we say more) blame the President for their hard times, but according to the latest Trump tweets, they’ve received $91bn in aid.

More aid relief than ever given to any state.

Hmmm…

Knowing the number of American citizens in any given geographical area provides law-makers with the knowledge necessary to determine accurate counts for key issues.

The U.S. Constitution, Art.1, Sec. 2, clause 3, calls for an enumeration (census) every 10 years, to ensure 1 House Representative for every 30,000 citizens. If the census can’t ask about a person’s citizenship, how else can gov’t determine proportionality?

Then, there’s the question of federally-funded social programs.

How can the U.S. government proportionally distribute those programs to its citizens, by state, if it doesn’t know the proportional citizenship demographics within those states?

Yet, Democrat politicians don’t want the question on the census, and fight it in court?

What would you bet it’s Democrat-controlled states fighting against the question?

After all, federally-funded dollars are sent to states to distribute amongst its qualifying citizenry and, if – on a state level – each state determines the amount of those who qualify, guess who pockets the excess when only REAL citizens get the funds?

We’re guessing…THE STATES.

So, basing their financial and representation needs on inflated numbers that include an illegal alien population is in their best financial & political interest…after the dust settles.

Hmmm…is it any wonder they don’t want the citizenship question asked?

After two-plus years of one explosive ‘leak’ after another materializing into NADA in this collusion hoax, the smart thing to do to is ignore their cry for the ‘full’ Mueller report.

First of all, by law THEY passed, much of the grand jury details must be confidential, in order to protect those caught up in the process who didn’t do anything wrong.

Secondly, the same politicians screaming for details were hoax-leakers already.

So, when you see op-eds from leading hoax-leakers like Nadler or Schiff that bewails a secretive process, demanding full transparency, recognize the claims for what they are.

If they’re allowed to trample law and get their way, they get to smear the innocent in their unbridled attempts to save Trump and any who associate with him, dissuade any from daring to serve in this administration, and keep it up until the 2020 election.

If they don’t get their way because THE LAW THEY CREATED is upheld, they’ll use the fact that they’re not being given full transparency to claim critical info is being withheld…

…and, regardless, their media masters will saturate the airwaves with chosen narrative.

Bottom Line: it’s another opportunity for them to further poison the political discourse.

Either way, their relentless ugliness and innuendo will prevail.

We’re left with Hobson’s Choice.

That said – protect the innocent…

 …OBEY THE LAW.

Don’t sacrifice the innocent, or rule-of-law, to their falsely defined ‘transparency.’