Now the Liar’s spokes-liar says the Liar wasn’t lying…?

“Jay Carney says…Obama didn’t know people would be cancelled due to Obamacare.”

Never mind the aides who debated whether he should lie. Never mind the video with Obama acknowledging to GOP’s Cantor that millions would lose their policies.

Never mind even uber-Liberal NBC reporting the administration knew, 3 years ago.

And never mind the Senate Gang of 60 Democrats who wrote and passed this disaster. After all, everybody knows Harry Reid doesn’t talk to Obama about such things…

…RIGHT…?

So, what this boils down to is, on the domestic agenda, Obama knows…nothing…and on the foreign policy agenda, Obama knows…nothing…and on the fight against al-Qaeda and attacks on our Americans in Benghazi, Obama knows…nothing.

When did Sargent Schultz become America’s president…?

Talk about rats deserting a sinking ship…

A Liberal blogger notes House Democrats are getting nervous about Obamacare.

They’re panicking, angry with Senate Democrats now undermining the law. Those Senators are up for re-election in 2014; their anxiety may hurt House Democrats.

(Notably, the article focuses on nervous politicians, and practically ignores the millions of Americans losing health plans and incurring painful, astronomical cost increases.)

So, to sum up: Democrats created a disastrous law behind locked doors, passed said disastrous law despite its unpopularity…and now run for cover when it blows up.

These ‘rats’ take the concept of deserting a sinking ship to a whole new level…

…because they gnawed the hole in the bottom…before running for the lifeboats.

Isn’t it funny how Liberal comments always focus on the damage of political blowback…

…instead of the damage done to Americans as a result of their disastrous laws.

(Corrected) Wanna shut down Obama’s fraudulent Organizing for Action campaign arm…?

If Organizing for Action (formerly Obama for America) repeated Obama’s lies about ‘keeping your insurance…’ during any email campaign or fundraising efforts…

…they’re guilty of computer fraud

“Federal law defines computer fraud as the use of a computer to create a dishonest misrepresentation of fact as an attempt to induce another to do or refrain from doing something which causes loss.”

Anyone…? Anyone…?

(Correction – blog originally called the organization Organizing for ‘America’, which was the first iteration, and the current iteration is ‘Action’)

GOP Senate would be in the Impeachment process driver’s seat…!

For those who point out that Impeachment would be difficult because it’s a Democrat-controlled Senate, we would respond that the Rule of Law negates that power…

…because those being tried cannot sit as jurors as well!!

Our Constitution gives the House sole Power of Impeachment under Article 1 Section 2, and the House of Representatives is GOP controlled. Impeach the Senate fraudsters.

Indict every Democrat Senator (and one Independent) who crafted the Obamacare law, voted for it, then remained silent while Obama lied for 3 years, and you can bet…

…the majority in the Senate left to sit in judgment will be Republicans

Any guess as to how that would turn out…?

What about the 60 Senate liars who stayed silent while Obama lied…?

The Wall Street Journal is forgetting something.

Their Monday story on panicked Democrat Senators up for re-election in 2014 ignores a larger picture: 60 Senators knew Obama was lying for 3+ years, but they stayed quiet.

58 Democrat Senators, one Independent Democrat, and an Independent made up the 60 votes which forced this disaster known as Obamacare onto the American people.

By their silence, they’re just as much liars as the ‘Liar-in-Chief’.

Experts say our Constitution doesn’t allow a ‘recall’ for members of Congress.

But, there are other ways to deal with these Liars…their fraud is a felony

…and according to Article 1, Section 6 of our Constitution, they can be arrested!

Because, under the legal definition of ‘fraud’…”When a person has a duty to speak, silence may be treated as a false statement.” Is there a lawyer in the house…?

Article 2, Section 4 says all civil Officers of the U.S. shall be removed from office for “…conviction of…high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Pretty sure fraud fits that definition.

And what of the bonus…? Has Hillary Clinton made any similar lying statements?

(Because we’re pretty sure the Constitution won’t allow felons to run for President…)

And this is how stupid Democrats think their voters are…

As predicted months ago, panicked Democrat Senators up for re-election in 2016 are pushing a plan now, to allow Americans to keep their  health plans if they like them…

…even though that would mean violating the other law that they already passed!

It also means requiring insurers to violate that other law by keeping non-compliant health plans in place…because…you know…Democrats run the insurance industry.

(?)

This is how stupid they think their Democrat voters are.

Democrats write law forcing insurers to change plans, which forces Americans to lose plans, then when it comes election time, try the ‘trust us, we’ll make it right’ routine.

Are deliberate defects really ‘flaws’…?

‘flaw’ implies a mistake, an error of judgment or calculation…

…but, there are no mistakes if such ‘flaws’ were deliberate…and calculated.

O’care’s designed to fail, pushing millions to clamor for single-payer, govt controlled health care, in essence turning over 1/6th of the economy to Washington DC.

And, thus, giving those politicians more control over you.

Obama and his Democrat cohort have openly stated a desire for a single-payer ultimate objective. Is it any wonder, then, when a ‘flawed’ Democrat law pushes you closer to it?

It’s bad enough when Americans are duped and lied to, then force-fed Obamacare.

But asking that we accept their ‘flawed’ premise as well is too much.

First we’re told it’s ‘universal’…but every group with Democrat ties are exempted.

Then we’re told it’s ‘law of the land’…but Obama illegally delays enforcing the employer mandate, and delays capping how much insurance companies can slam you for out-of-pocket insurance costs like deductibles and co-pays. (Good for insurers, bad for you.)

And throughout, there was the “if you like your insurance, you can keep it’ lie…

And now they’re claiming the law is ‘flawed’?

There’s never been a more clear definition of ‘adding insult to injury’.

Flaws? Ask yourself…why write a law that allows the penalty that supposedly forces everyone into the system…to so easily be avoided?

Face it folks…if this disaster remains law, it’s designed to fail to raise revenue, which means taxpayers will be funding 1 more out-of-control government monstrosity…

…soon.

If small percentages are insignificant, why did we disrupt the healthcare system in the 1st place?

Obama’s mealy-mouthing about his ‘you can keep insurance if you like it’ lie.

He shrugs it off, though, noting that it’s only ‘a small percentage’ of citizens who are suffering insurance cancellations, mostly in the private-insurance category.

A small percentage? But that’s 15 million citizens.

Isn’t that about the same amount of uninsured…

…that Democrats used to force this O’care disaster on us in the first place?

Front-loading a question with a back-loaded lie…

A Left-leaning group says 71% of Americans support immigration reform.

But neglects to mention the question started with a ‘secure borders’ condition.

And, of course, those polled weren’t asked if they knew Obama runs the Border Patrol.

Considering Obama’s willingness to not enforce laws he dislikes, and to lie about the laws he’s forcing onto an unsuspecting public, a follow-on question is crucial to polling.

“With Obama’s track record of untruths and ignored laws, do you trust the President now to enforce a law he dislikes, to ensure borders will really be secure?”

We bet the support percentage for immigration reform would drop like a rock.

‘Cuz, all the while, after 5 long years, Americans now know what Obama’s thinking…

…”if I like my Border Control policy (the way it is), I’ll keep my Border Control Policy (the way it is)…