NBC’s star anchorman has been caught in a huge Clinton-esque lie.

Now it seems every story he’s reported is being fact-checked… …wouldn’t it be great if the news media were expected to do that for every news story? Oh, wait…

From John Kerry’s Cambodia fantasy to Clinton’s sniper falsity, Obama’s ‘you can keep your health plan’ to Brian Williams’s war story, it’s clear that conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh has been right all along…Liberals LIE.

And they do so in many creative ways (mostly to veil their own misdeeds).

And they’re also pretty imaginative when it’s time to justify their lies.

When it comes to Liberals demonizing Republicans (war on women, racist, etc) it’s long been their mantra that the ‘seriousness of the charge’ is always much more important than the lack of any evidence proving the charge; i.e., facts don’t matter.

(Thus, in their world, the fact that they lie to make others look bad isn’t a big deal.)

Lying politicians can always find fools to vote for them, but media celebrity is a fickle and fleeting thing. Plunging viewer trust can relegate a journalist to obscurity Hell.

This current major-media feeding frenzy isn’t just about taking down a ‘King of the (media) Hill’…we suggest the media is frantically piling on Williams…

…in the hopes nobody thinks to fact check THEM.

‘In our home country…Jim Crow (laws) all too often… justified in the name of Christ.’

You can’t make this stuff up. At a National Prayer Breakfast, Obama equated deep-south Democrat bigotry to the barbarity of beheadings, and burning a man alive?

The ‘Scolder-in-Chief’ says we shouldn’t get on our opinionated ‘high horse’…

…because bad things were done by Christians 800 years ago, and done by Democrats in the American south as late as the 1960’s…as if today’s medieval form of Islam is somehow okay because it can’t evolve into tolerance of others?

Every day, in every way, this poor excuse for a leader reveals a spineless character.

And now he’s equating Islamist bestiality with his own Democrat Party’s past racist acts. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid must be so proud of the leader of their Party.

Message to Obama…the majority of Republicans and honest Independents are very comfortable in the saddle on the ‘high horse’ you so casually snigger at…

…but how do you think your Democrat cohort feels…riding a jackass?

Blocking a Homeland Security funding bill puts Democrats on record as willing to support an amnesty action by Obama, rather than obey their oath to the American people.

In the past, Obama openly admitted that his amnesty actions would be unconstitutional, and in December, 2014, a federal judge ruled Obama’s acts unconstitutional as well.

As such, the Senate rule covering filibusters can be set aside on this matter.

The Senate Majority Leader should invoke the nuclear option, forcing a 51-vote majority to pass a Homeland Security bill that excludes unconstitutional (amnesty) acts from funding.

The Nov. 2014 midterms rejected the Democrats’ intent to inflict amnesty on Americans.

Time to show Democrats that American security is worth more than political posturing…

…and time to show Americans their trust in Republicans will be honored.

Democrats killed the filibuster to stack courts with Obama appointees…

…surely Homeland Security is more important – stop the filibuster.

“Senate Dems Block Homeland Security Funding Bill”

They didn’t want to vote for a bill that won’t fund Obama’s amnesty for immigrants.

America’s security is being held hostage by a Democrat amnesty drive.

Homeland security shouldn’t be used as a bargaining chip. The Republican Senate Majority Leader should invoke the nuclear option, taking the filibuster off the table.

Our national security is too important for political posturing.

Let your Senator know how you feel on this subject.

The CEO of the revered Gallup polling group has discovered what we have known for a long time: “The official unemployment rate…is extremely misleading.”

‘Extremely misleading’ is still being too generous…the official unemployment rate as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor is a flat-out LIE.

An ‘unemployment rate’, that doesn’t count everyone who is unemployed, is a lie.

Funny how it took the people at Gallup this long to catch on.

Free idea for 2016 bumper stickers.

Hillary 2016? E-e-w-w-w…

Exemplifying Everything Wrong With Washington

Obama’s executive actions and threats create serious immigration problems.

So when he threatens the GOP not to jeopardize national security over immigration it begs to be pointed out that he’s ALREADY doing that.

“Can Hillary’s hopes survive Benghazi?” (IBD Jan 29, by Andrew Malcolm)

LMAO. Short answer: with this news media…of course.

After all…

…Obama survived the Benghazi tragedy within two months after it occurred!

And if the man directly responsible can get (re)elected after that failure…

…you bet, with their lapdog news media, a hench-woman of his can.

Reader John K. (coincidence?) invokes anti-Semitism as a legitimate reason for the removal of Israel from the Middle East…since their existence offends others.

But look what’s happening in Afghanistan, Syria, and Iraq…purely Muslim-on-Muslim violence. No one can assert ISIS is beheading Muslims because they’re Jewish.

Taking religion out of the equation, our earlier blog is more relevant than ever…why would anyone object to tolerance and freedom existing in the Middle East?

Only when ‘religion’ is added are anti-Israel players able to try justifying their views.

But, since when does intolerance beget tolerance?

Dr. Krauthammer has a new article discussing the possibility of the next Holocaust, if Iran is given the opportunity to finish developing a nuclear weapon.

Considering the last Holocaust, the need for such an article is a global disgrace.

The Jewish religion is not the cause of this relentless anti-Semitic unrest…

…INTOLERANCE of religion is the cause…

…stoked by despotic leaders of restive masses, whose nations have failed them.

For those narrow-minded souls who try to assuage the intolerance, remember this…

…that intolerant ‘Muslim lion’ will still be hungry after the last Jew is devoured.

Non-believer religions…it’s what’s for lunch.

Why would the administration refuse to label the Taliban as terrorists?

Could it be because doing so puts Obama in the spotlight for releasing 5 of them, in a disgusting swap of these al-Qaeda allies for suspected deserter Bowe Bergdahl?

Even worse, it now looks like one of the 5 is trying to return to his jihadist lifestyle.

So, when you hear of a tap-dancing White House Press flack who won’t call the Taliban ‘terrorists’, but admits they commit acts of terror, it makes you wonder.

(Maybe Obama remembers one of the bills he signed, the National Defense Authorization Act, which makes it a crime of treason to “…offer or provide any material support to terrorist groups”.)

‘Any material support’ no doubt includes releasing terrorists. And, lest we forget, treason is one of the impeachable crimes provided for in the U.S. Constitution.

Naah…can’t be…the House GOP has given him a ‘get-out-of-impeachment’ card.