Obama’s in Alaska hyping the urgency of global warming.

What does it say about one’s credibility, using a summer day to mourn a glacier’s melt, unless of course you feel it inaccurate to believe glaciers melt during summer?

Remember ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse’?

Evidently Hillary doesn’t. (Nor any other Democrats, for that matter.)

Funny, as a lawyer you’d think she knows that.

Incredibly, now the State Dept runs interference for Hillary by claiming ‘stupid’.

They say there’s ‘no way to know’ if emails should’ve been classified at the time.

Here’s a random thought…

…ASK THE INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, MORONS!!

(And, can anyone advise… why is the State Department, that’s just as much a part of this ongoing, all-enveloping scandal, doing the analyzing?)

The U.S. has about 1950 miles of border with Mexico, approx 650 already walled.

Of the remaining border that needs to be fenced, it sounds a lot harder than it is.

Say 1500 miles remain to be fenced. Break it down into 15 units of 100-miles each and put those units up to bid, awarding 7 to union shops, 8 to non-union shops.

Offer performance bonuses for early completion, and let the game begin.

Report – Senate Democrats have lined up enough support for Obama’s Iran deal…

…proving once again, ‘stupid is as stupid does’.

Understand, this report is about the Senate 1) voting to reject Obama’s deal, which 2) forces Obama to veto it, which then 3) forces a failed Senate override vote…

…and NONE of this has happened yet.

So all this pre-vote posturing is…posturing – presumably to see if the GOP will blink.

Given the Obama-Iran deal exposed weaknesses, everything possible should be done to neutralize it (and, last resort, individual states can enforce sanctions).

But if GOP Senators have any courage left there’s one position they must take…

Force the Democrats’ hand: 10 of their senators are up for re-election in 2016 (several plan to retire, among them Mikulski, who just gave the Iran deal support).

Make them stand with Obama, and try justifying their vote to cave to Iran. America’s national security is at stake…this is one issue the GOP can’t ignore, or avoid.

And there’s little reason for them not to fight hard against this deal. Swing states strongly oppose the Iran deal…those states are critical in national elections. Yes, Americans see this as a bad deal…and, thus, a critical issue for 2016 elections.

Man up, Republicans. Your much-derided Corker bill may yet prove a winner.

Reject Obama’s Iran deal…send that rejection to Obama, force him to veto it…then make Democrats support Obama’s veto when the Senate votes to override it. You get two opportunities to expose Democrats for the nat’l security failures they are.

And watch the fallout when the 2016 pre-election political games play out.

Call the Democrats’ bluff – let’s see how many really think a nuclear Iran is okay…

…just months before a national election.

Anyone following the news by now clearly knows Hillary used her private email server for communicating while she conducted the Nation’s business as Secretary of State.

So, when you see a headline that says: “66% Fear Hillary’s Private Emails Hurt National Security“, then read ‘those following the email scandal closely’ were polled…

…it begs the question…

…are the 34% who don’t see it hurting national security idiots?

‘Those following the email scandal closely’ know she did not use gov’t provided (thus, much more secure) email…and reports indicate her private account was hacked.

How does anyone think that wouldn’t hurt national security?

The 34% are either idiots, or indifferent…so long as she’s Democrat.

Considering the national security laws she broke while Secretary of State, it should be obvious by now that charges must be brought against Hillary Clinton.

But indicting her before a Republican is elected president in 2016 is problematic. If his Dept of Justice indicts Hillary, Obama can just pardon her. But, will he okay indicting her?

Problem is, if charges aren’t brought, for much of 2016 Hillary can claim it’s all hot air, and her proof is, because charges HAVEN’T been brought forward…it’s all ‘just politics’.

Republicans should clearly define the laws she broke, their concerns over the possibility of an 11th hour pardon from Obama, and that Americans would be denied true justice.

The GOP must lay out the criminal nature of the laws she broke, and the resulting impact.

In areas where Middle East policy failed (Benghazi, Syria, ISIL, etc), a case can be made how hacked emails off her private server caused loss of life, and other failures.

Make Obama’s administration produce her emails…after all, the NSA has all of yours.

Incredibly, the same thug who runs a Union (enforcing their rules with lead-pipe efficiency) says that Republicans, who want America’s law enforced, are hateful.

Is there a more clear definition of ‘the pot calling the kettle black’?

Unions sent death threats to Gov. Walker’s wife, suggesting his assassination, or that of the elderly parents or their kids. Members of Local 17 stabbed a company executive in the neck, and threatened a company representative’s wife with rape.

But of course, AFL-CIO’s Trumka sees nothing hateful with legitimate union activity.

Union members must be so proud.

Hillary resorts to nasty, comparing Pro-Life Republicans to terrorists…but…

…if ‘(Any) Lives Matter’…

…wouldn’t the Party that supports killing 730,000 unborn babies every year, then condones the selling of harvested body parts, better qualify for that comparison?

Just askin’.

Right on cue, Lib media preps an ‘underestimating ISIS not Democrat’s fault’ meme.

The NY Times implies ‘even Obama was misled’ by false progress against ISIS.

REALLY?

After ISIS/ISIL rose to prominence in Syria in 2011, is it logical to believe numerous U.S. intel groups covering data-gathering waited 4 more years to imply such acts?

There are too many cooks in that kitchen. With the sycophants surrounding Obama, it’s stretching the realm of sanity to suggest he just now found out he was misled.

It’s not hard to believe this is just a ploy to whitewash his failed MidEast policies.

(Besides…would Sid Blumenthal EVER admit the wool was pulled over his eyes?)