Was slowing Iran’s uranium enrichment hinged on their import-quotas?

Considering Iran’s ‘sudden’ discovery of new uranium deposits‘, wouldn’t it be ironic if Obama’s deal to slow/stall Iran’s enrichment hinged on IMPORTED uranium?

‘Cuz, if that’s true, Iran probably was aware of their uranium deposits, conveniently ‘forgot’ to mention them…but now can say they’re exempt from enrichment quotas.

Which shows, in 1 more area of this disastrous deal, Obama and Kerry got played…

…AGAIN.

Don’t write off Rick Perry yet

He has a great track record governing Texas, creating jobs and economic gains.

His 14-year tenure included balanced budgets, 2.2 million jobs created, and signed or sponsored legislation that cut taxes 75 times during that period.

Rick Perry may say he’s dropped out, but don’t write him off…he can get back in.

For all the popularity of Trump, bottom line is…voters want a fighter. They don’t care about anything other than the fact he’s willing to vocalize what so many are feeling.

Gov. Perry should take a page out of that book.

Because, while Donald Trump may talk a good game, he has little in the way of personal history to show he’ll ever walk that talk.

Trump rarely gets into the weeds, using bluff and bravado to carry the day. And if ambiguity triumphs over substance this early in a campaign, others can do that too.

Early polling be damned…

We encourage Rick Perry to re-calibrate, roll up his sleeves, and come out swinging.

(The sooner, the better.)

What better time to invoke a nuclear option, than to stop this Iran nuclear deal?

The GOP Senate wants another run at the Iran deal, Democrats will block it.

Unless…

…the Senate Majority Leader invokes the nuclear option for a 51-vote majority.

Failing to do so gives Iran $150bn in sanction relief they can use to support more terror acts globally…and gets Iran that much closer to nuclear weapons.

Obama never complied with the mandate to give Congress ALL the details of his deal, so Congress shouldn’t be legitimizing the Corker bill, but if they insist…

…a ‘nuclear option’ prevents Democrats from their filibuster stalling.

What better time to implement the ‘nuclear option’, than to stop this idiocy?

Au contraire, Bernie…your leader wasn’t elected for his ideas, he was elected because of his skin color

Socialist Bernie Sanders pushed all the Liberal buttons today.

Asked what he’d do to ‘bring healing, resolution to the issue of racism’ in America, he went on a racist rant for 4 minutes, predictably pushing a cops-as-killers lie…

…then in the last 10 seconds, gave the ‘stand up and say no’ invocation.

Sanders claimed Obama was elected in 2008 for his ideas, not his skin color, but the opposite is true…if Obama had told the truth about Obamacare, open borders, or enabling a nuclear Iran, he would have never been elected!

Then, after pushing the cops-unnecessarily-killing-blacks meme, Sanders had the audacity to speak of ‘politicians who disgracefully used racism’ to garner support.

Not answering questions and disavowing what they themselves do is what Liberals are all about…

…Sanders demonstrated that perfectly for 4 minutes and 40 seconds today.

(And, by the way, Bernie, the principles America was founded on were not ‘racist’. What was racist is how those all-inclusive principles were selectively applied.)

We can all relax now, Democrats are finally asking for ‘honest’ intel reports…

Obama’s ‘it was a video’ team of experts have been caught ‘editing’ intel reports.

Wanting the boss to appear effective on all things jihad, they altered analyst reports to make it appear the ISIS-al Qaeda efforts were failing, even as they were growing.

But, we can all relax – caught in the act, they’re now calling for honest reports.

What a relief that will be.

10 acres and a…Sage Grouse?

In the federal government’s bid to control every aspect of our daily lives, now we are faced with their efforts to declare 424,700 Sage Grouse an endangered species.

What’s really at stake is who gets to control managing sage areas – state or federal.

At an est. cost of $760 million – $1789 per sage grouse – the feds have (surprise!) started a program, setting aside 4.4 million acres for the affected grouse.

For the math-challenged among us, that’s 10 acres per Sage Grouse.

Aren’t you wishing you grew feathers? (Think twice, there’s no hunting ban yet.)

The land-grab is primarily in Montana, Idaho, Colorado, Nevada, Wyoming, and Utah. Naturally, states worried about their economies want management control.

Land once occupied by Nez Perce, Sioux, Shoshone, Cheyenne, Crow, Arapaho, and Osage tribes…which begs the question of effective D.C. political priorities.

For all the talk of reparations, why aren’t Indian reservations used as set asides? Pay the Indian tribesmen to manage Sage Grouse…‘feathered casinos’ if you will.

At a lower rate of $100/Sage Grouse, an entrepreneurial tribesman could manage a Sage Grouse farm of 500 birds, earning an annual $50k…PLUS egg sale revenue.

Taxpayers would save a bundle, states wouldn’t have to worry about their economy, and Native Americans would be ‘at one with Nature’, while earning decent incomes.

Failing that, the Supreme Court could hand down an ‘open marriage’ ruling…

…then the more daring among us could marry a Sage Grouse…

with a $1789 dowry

…AND 10 ACRES OF LAND!

Knowing they have the full force of the federal government behind them…

…imagine how well they’ll take care of their ‘ feathered family’.

Re-stating the obvious…when has giving terror-nations nuke capabilities EVER been a good thing?

The inevitable apologist asks for ‘5 good reasons’ to kill the deal.

Asking for 5 good reasons why the Iran deal should go down in flames begs the question…when is it ever a good idea to give terror sponsors nuclear capability?

Getting past that, the following are additional convincing reasons to kill the deal…

2) Iran is recognized universally as the global leader in sponsoring terror;

3) Iran would receive $150+ BILLION in sanctions relief as part of the deal, without any assurances that the billions would not be used to fund more terror acts;

4) Iran would be allowed to continue and EXPAND NUCLEAR efforts;

5) The ‘deal’ does not allow America to participate in monitoring inspections;

6) The ‘deal’ allows ONLY Iran to provide inspections of what they’ve done so far;

7) The ‘deals’ so-called ‘snapback’ sanction capability is neutered by language that says sanctions CAN’T be ‘snapped back’ once they’ve been waived/rescinded;

8) The deal ignores major facilities involved in their weaponizing aspects, and aren’t part of the deal in terms of ANY inspection process;

9) The Obama administration has openly admitted (as far back as 2010) that Iran is, has been, and continues working with al-Qaeda;

10) The Iranian long-range ballistic missile program doesn’t belong in a ‘deal’ that was only supposed to be about a nuclear program (unless of course you consider that they’re only meant for deployment of nuclear warheads);

11) America, as part of the deal, is REQUIRED to aid Iran in PROTECTING the program of which we are not allowed inspection verification capabilities?

If any sane person got past the first sentence and its question without having real doubts, did they get past #2…#3…surely not #4…before realizing it’s a bad deal?

And we never got into the ‘we refuse any inspections that will discover how badly we violated past sanctions’ verbiage…

…that defies determining where any ‘deal’ starting point should be!

(B-T-W, all of the above can be verified on a universal group of news sites. So, it’s fruitless for apologists to dismiss the above as ‘Fox News’ talking points.)

Apologists should produce hard evidence that refutes the above…or shut up.

And please…spare us the NBC/ABC/CBS empty talking points.

3rd world nations want America to pay reparations? 1) Why? 2) Does foreign aid count?

Now 3rd world nations want reparations every time a storm passes through?

Who is surprised this was coming?

First, it’s egocentric in the extreme to believe man can impact the weather.

Every global warming scenario/prediction has been based on computer modeling, and we all know that if you feed the desired factors in, desired results come out.

Everyone knows temperature AND co2 levels were higher when man was still using campfires…and in a Carboniferous Period, when no trace of man was on the planet.

Beyond that though, America leads the developed nations in foreign aid, to nations that show no inclination of using democracy as a foundation for economic success.

Foreign aid, to nations that prefer the black market system to free-market systems.

Check the numbers…$38bn/year in foreign aid, much higher than any other nation.

Next time someone says ‘reparations’, tell them you gave…at the IRS.

They can stop the Iran deal…failure to act makes Republicans responsible for its consequences

Obama never complied with a mandate to make all aspects of the Iran deal known.

A Republican Senate can still stop Obama from giving Iran $150 billion in sanction relief, if they grow a backbone and declare him in non-compliance of the Corker bill.

Failure to do so makes Obama’s disastrous deal, along with sanction-relieflaw.

What reasonable person gives $150 billion to the leading global terror state?

The GOP can stop this, but the question is…will they?

As Andrew McCarthy points out, the Senate can pass a failure-to-comply resolution nullifying the Corker bill, which then negates the statutory nature of sanction relief.

Not doing so would be problematic for Republicans.

Obama and Democrats can rightly argue there were mechanisms in place the GOP refused to use…if a gutless GOP Senate won’t take legitimate action to stop this

…they own it.