Impeaching Hillary nullifies her eligibility to hold public office

A previous post notes Hillary Clinton can be impeached for lying to Congress under oath, and no President can roll back an impeachment.

Our Constitution says, once impeached, she could no longer hold public office (Article I, section 3, 7th para.).

And, further, a President cannot pardon an impeachment (Art.II, section 2, para.1).

She lied to Congress, which means she lied to the American people, about serious lapses of judgement, and deliberate efforts to conceal her activities.

All that’s needed is a House with guts to initiate articles of impeachment…

…and an honest Senate willing to hold a (former) public official accountable.

By the way, Comey’s review shows that Congress can impeach Hillary for lying under oath

Obama’s lawlessness neutralizes any Dept of Justice indictment regarding Hillary Clinton’s email malfeasance, but Comey paved the way for Congress to impeach.

Seems she lied under oath testifying before Congress on several issues, and the investigation FBI Dir. Comey referred to yesterday clearly pointed that out.

Obama can pardon indictments, but he can’t pardon an impeachment.

Problem? We need a Congress with guts…

…oh well.

Would you prefer a pre-election Hillary pardoned…or dangling in the wind?

As the conservative media twists itself into knots over Hillary’s escape from indictment, it’s important to remember a core principle supporting ‘rule-of-law’…

…It’s Only As Good As The People That Enforce It.

As our previous post noted, a lawless Obama would’ve pardoned her.

So, if the Democrat Party is willing to serve up Hillary for November voters…

…we repeat…

…would you prefer her pardoned…or dangling in the wind?

In our opinion, she’s more vulnerable left dangling until the election.

Silver lining in FBI Dir. Comey’s decision not to recommend Hillary be prosecuted?

Is there a silver lining in Director Comey’s decision? We think so.

Given the lawless nature of Obama’s administration, would there be any doubt he would pardon an indicted Hillary Clinton (especially if she has dirt on him)?

Hey, failing to prosecute now, is no guarantee she can’t be prosecuted later

…when another President (hopefully a law-abiding one) enters office…

…at which time, Obama’s pardon-powers will no longer be in effect.

(But we can’t ignore the idiocy that FBI Director Comey wants the American people to buy…he says because intent isn’t provable, no prosecution is possible. Taking that logic to it’s inevitable conclusion, any drunk driver who kills a pedestrian can’t be prosecuted for it…because the driver didn’t intend to kill anyone.)

Happy Birthday to the greatest Nation in the world

Happy Birthday America.

For those who sneer at the thought of U.S. exceptionalism, we refer you to the cold facts that America is the first Nation conceived in freedom, and her free-market capitalist economy is the engine that drives the global economy.

We’ve given more (gov’t & business) economic aid to foreign countries, and helped more nations achieve sovereignty, than all other nations of the world combined.

Not bad for a Nation whose GDP represents over 30% of the global GDP, while using less than 18% of global energy resources!

(And we won’t even mention our direct influence over other nation’s GDP.)

America – you are Beautiful…

…and your detractors are uneducated, rabble-rousing louts.

Liar’s Game…smokescreening the REAL failure in Benghazi

Quick, what’s easier to answer for: being a liar…or being derelict of duty?

You would think a smart Republican would wonder why Hillary and the Obama goon squad are so blase over being caught with their ‘it was a video’ Benghazi lies.

When you think about it though, it’s a no-brainer.

For a Democrat, being categorized a liar is (usually) a badge of honor.

It’s much more difficult to defend dereliction of duty…especially when that failure causes American deaths…and could be a career-ender, even for a Democrat.

The real failure of Benghazi was not activating 6th Fleet extraction teams which could have rescued Americans earlier, saving at least Glen Doherty and Ty Woods.

Because it was a full 6 hours and 20 minutes after the initial attack began, when both Doherty and Woods were killed.

The U.S. Navy 6th Fleet is stationed in Naples Italy, with several units specifically tasked to provide evacuation for threatened Americans in its theater of operations.

The distance from Naples Italy to Benghazi Libya is 668.3 miles. The teams are on standby 24/7, and could have been there within 2 hours…but no order was given.

The Benghazi timeline lasted almost 7 hours, from initial assault to final cessation. (And reports are that several hours before, attackers began sealing off streets.)

Almost 40 Americans could have died, yet the State Dept and Commander-in-Chief failed to activate highly trained U.S. Spec-Ops evacuation teams. (Only Obama and the State Dept could authorize the military force necessary to implement a rescue.)

The most important job of our elected leaders, is protecting Americans.

So it’s no wonder Obama and Hillary are so willing to let the ‘it-was-a-video’ lies and accusations run their course – it obscures an impeachable failure…

…they both violated their oath of office by failing to ‘well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office’ they had been elected and/or appointed to fulfill.

When the assault began, they had no idea how long it would last, or how many Americans could be killed. Their failure could have sealed the fate of 40 Americans.

4 died.

More could have.

That’s why they hope all we dwell on is the ‘video’ lie.

Overwhelming U.S. military forces were in the area, ready to go, yet not deployed.

Americans would be better served if Republicans would ‘man-up’ and point this out.

Non-stop.

24/7.