President laughing his Ossoff…it’s a referendum on Trump all right…

Georgia election results show it’s not about the media’s pre-election bad polling data’.

The so-called pre-election ‘polling’ was meant to drive a narrative intended to suppress the GOP vote and excite the Democrat vote by implying  a huge Democrat backlash…

…that never existed, and STILL DOESN’T.

(And, of course, the media will remind us this wasn’t a referendum on Democrats.)

But, you know what, we agree with pre-election prognosticators on one point…

…it IS a referendum on Trump…

…and there are some Republicans in Congress who better wise up to that.

After 5 months on the job, all he can claim is…

It’s been 5 months since Donald Trump was inaugurated, and IBD sums it up

“The only side effects of the Trump presidency have been massive job creation, a new Supreme Court justice, stock market records, lower unemployment, congressional action on the repeal and replacement of ObamaCare, aggressive tax-reform proposals, a successful foreign policy that has terrorists on the run, a respected America back leading the world, strengthened relationships with our most-trusted allies, and the elimination of costly and unnecessary Obama-era regulations.”

And, gosh…we’re all still here, the world hasn’t melted.

Hey, it didn’t take foreign meddling to expose a LOUSY candidate

Let’s face it, Democrats…your candidate sucked.

It didn’t take ‘Russian meddling’ to expose what the entire Nation plainly saw.

Even a partisan sham-stream media couldn’t whitewash that obvious truth.

And, to the extent illegal aliens are foreign, the fact even millions of them illegally voting couldn’t manage to get Hillary dragged across the Finish line should say something.

The phrase you’ll never hear an opposition Democrat party mention…

The one phrase you’ll never hear an opponent Democrat party mention is…

…’better ideas’.

So when, just days after a Bernie Sanders supporter shoots a Republican congressman, Senator Sanders tells his voters to get out there and ‘fight ANY WAY possible’…

…and doesn’t mention ‘in the arena of ideas or solutions‘…

…the logical assumption is, using Republicans for target practice is okay with him.

Because, where Republicans are all about honesty on issues…

…Democrats are all about hysteria.

The shooting of Congressman Scalise by a Sanders supporter should have been a wake-up call to the Left, but it looks like Bernie Sanders refuses to take that call.

If special counsel Mueller does his job THOROUGHLY, it must include… everyone

To the extent that special counsel Mueller is investigating obstruction/collusion/leak acts during and after the election, it’s an honest question to ask if he’ll include…Democrats.

After all, his buddy (former FBI director Comey) implicated Democrats during his Senate testimony, when he stated Obama’s Attorney General pushed her narrative on him.

She ordered him to refer to the ‘matter’ of then-candidate Hillary Clinton’s email imbroglio, rather than as what it was – an investigation – to give Clinton cover during her campaign.

That, my friends, was ‘obstruction’…

…unlike the talk President Trump had with Comey in February, where he ‘hoped (Comey) could see his way clear’ to leave Flynn alone, after learning Flynn did nothing wrong.

That wasn’t obstruction: 1) it was NOT an order, and 2) even if it was worded as an order, as President he has the legal authority to end any investigation, not to mention that…

…3) to prove obstruction requires proving corruption – to establish that means an official must know their order is against the law, but as shown in 2) above, it’s lawful to do so…

…for a President.

For a great article on this, see Andrew McCarthy’s latest op-ed at NRO.

Now let’s talk about collusion, where, for a year now no evidence has been produced that shows Trump or his campaign colluded with Russia, but it begs a larger question…

Why isn’t there any talk about back-channel and open talks with Russia by Democrats?

We know, we have proof, of Clinton campaign chairman Podesta’s engaging with them, as well as other Democrats, yet, typically, sham-stream media focus is centered…

…against Republicans and Trump, where no proof exists.

Finally, about the leaks that have actually caused the most damage in this mess – damage to America’s global credibility – a primary self-confessed leaker has been found.

Former FBI director James Comey…

…you know…the guy everyone was trusting to conduct an ‘impartial’ investigation.

And, oh yeah…a very good friend of Mueller’s for over 15 years now.

President Trump has the right to replace the compromised and conflicted Mueller with another special counsel…someone who might be more willing to probe EVERYONE.

Failing that, and absent a thorough investigation, this Mueller scenario is a farce.

Hey…it was a counter-intelligence investigation to start with. The ‘special counsel’ rule is for criminal investigations. But if they bend rules, the least they can do is acknowledge…

…that leaking intelligence is a bad thing…right, Mr. Comey?

So, to the extent that Russia-collusion and intelligence-agency leaking is cause for wide investigation, it should involve BOTH Republican and Democrat campaign groups…

…and if you want to talk presidential obstruction and/or meddling (as it pertains to how the pre-election campaigns were conducted), let’s look at Barack Obama too.

Queen of Fake-News New York Times… ‘…once more unto the (Trump-referendum) breach’

For breathless hyperbole and faux swooning virginity, you can’t beat the Times.

A special election in Georgia for the House seat to replace now-Health Secretary Tom Price has the NY Times aflutter, eagerly anticipating a (heavily financed) Democrat win.

Their assertion that “…it has evolved into one of the most consequential special elections in decades…” oddly fails to mention how the Left fabricates such ‘evolving’ processes.

This is probably a fourth or fifth time ‘unto the breach’ for Democrats since they lost big in November; each time, their win would be a ‘referendum’ on Trump and the GOP…

…strangely, their eventual losses were never seen as a referendum on Democrats.

But then, this is a well-traveled road for them, on their Never-Our-Referendum Bus.

(Witness reporting on the ’10 GOP House takeover, the ’12 GOP House wins building on that hold, the ’14 GOP Senate takeover, and November 2016 presidential win.)

It must be nice for them to dwell within a ‘referendum for thee, but not for me’ world.

In Shakespeare’s Henry V, the bodies of English dead storming French fortifications were a very real symbol of the price that’s paid when the battle wasn’t going their way, and they were urged “once more unto the breach, dear friends…”  by their King.

But, when they’re losing, for the NY Times and Democrats…

…Symbols…who needs symbols?

Needless to say, anything could happen. And the fact that they’ve poured a ton of money into this particular election makes it the “…most expensive House contest in history”.

(Consider this…of the $23 million Democrat donations, $700k is from within the district.)

So, if by some stroke of luck they win…

…it’ll be ‘the referendum’

…(not the money).

‘Consequential’? We’ll see…that $22.7 million dollar question will be answered tomorrow.