Just when you think congresswoman Maxine Waters can’t make herself out to look any more stupid, she proves us wrong, claiming “there’s no law on impeachment“…

“Impeachment is about whatever Congress says it is. There is no law that dictates impeachment” …except, Mad Maxine, there’s this pesky little Constitution document you may have heard of, and remember, if you took your oath before those (obviously powerful) meds of yours kicked in…

…you know…that document you swore to uphold and defend.

Article II, section 4: “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

But maybe you mistakenly double-dosed that day?

Fox News reports...

“Facebook will release Russia-linked ads to Congress, Mark Zuckerberg says”

(We wonder if any of the FakeNews media will report on this, if a review of the ads determines they favored positions or politicians on the Democrat side?)

March 5th, Meet the Press, Clapper denied a FISA warrant existed.

Fast forward, yesterday, Clapper talking to CNN: “I can’t comment on a specific FISA order. I can’t confirm or deny it…and actually, uh, commenting on FISAs are classified, and so, uh, even if I knew something about it I couldn’t, and I don’t. And, and I, again, I will just conclude by saying I stand on what, uh, I said on the 5th of March.”

So now he’s saying, because FISA warrants are classified, he’s not allowed to comment but yet on March 5th, he stated unequivocally 1) he would know a FISA warrant existed, and 2) categorically denied any FISA warrant existed. That, folks, is a ‘comment’.

He’ll twist and dodge alluding to the fact he meant ‘Trump only’, but in his March 5th remarks he specifically stated “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the President-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.”

Yup, yup…that sure seems to be a ‘comment’ (and a fairly all-inclusive one at that).

Manafort was chairman of the Trump campaign for times during which FISA warrants were used against him by Team Obama, and even when he no longer worked on the campaign directly, his conversations were being surveilled, so that means anybody he spoke to on the Trump campaign team during the FISA tap was surveilled as well.

Of course, proving Clapper a liar is old news.

Maybe AG Sessions doesn’t act because he’s bewildered by the wealth of targets?

Metaphorically – think of it this way: an illegal act occurs (think ‘collusion’ or ‘meddling’), the police know…yet do nothing about it (think Obama’s team). A wad of currency from that illegal act is left on the sidewalk (think election results). Another pedestrian (Hillary) doesn’t see it – you find and enjoy that wad of cash (think Mr. Trump’s presidency).

How logical is it for you to be charged by police with a crime, when you didn’t know of or commit the crime that made found cash available in the first place?

Considering the administration in power at the time could have done something in the event of foreign meddling pre-election, but didn’t, they in effect colluded – not Trump.

Remember? Obama, it was very widely reported, told Russia “cut it out”. And, it was also reported, Obama said the voting process couldn’t actually be tampered with, so it was no big deal. It was obvious Obama knew what was happening, but did nothing.

Now, with confirming news that Trump’s campaign people were being surveilled by the FBI, CIA, and NSA, it’s totally ridiculous to suggest Obama wouldn’t have done anything if intercepts indicated Trump collusion was in fact occurring, and beyond ridiculous to assert nothing of that nature would have been leaked by now…IF collusion happened.

So we’re left with three inescapable facts:

1. Lack of evidence, including absence of any leaks, proves President Trump had no active role in any interference, IF there was interference; and,
2. There’s no logic trying to argue a Democrat president would not have discussed meddling (IF it occurred) with the Democrat candidate it could’ve affected; and,
3. Obama, his team, AND Hillary, by their inaction, colluded with Russians – if there was interference going on that might have affected an election outcome.

Any reason for Obama’s inaction doesn’t matter. The fact they did nothing, by their own inaction, tacitly accepted any interference, and it’s bizarre on the face of it to hold Mr. Trump or any of his campaign team responsible for Team Obama’s incompetence.

Which means, by the way, the basis for special counsel Mueller is fraudulent.

Washington has a choice: Stop wasting taxpayer money on this special counsel fraud against President Trump, or switch its targeting to the REAL Colluder-in-Chief…

…Barack Hussein Obama. (But then, inevitably…some Democrat legal wag could always claim ‘prosecutorial discretion’ – so what’s the point?)

Considering all the profits thrown Russia’s way in the UraniumOne deal, and Podesta’s work with the Ukraine, etc, an honest non-partisan DoJ would’ve surveilled both sides to ensure no foreign entities were trying to get involved in our presidential election.

Because, unlike a total LACK of evidence of Trump-team collusion so far, there’s a ton of evidence that the Clinton’s and their aides were working every side of foreign deals.

But we’re sure THAT type of non-partisan behavior never happened.

Which proves…once more now, with passion…WITCH-HUNT.

In a BRUTAL take-down, Walter Williams destroys the Left’s race-baiting claims of long-ago slavery being the cause of so many problems facing black Americans today, laying out the truth – the Left’s welfare system is the real culprit of black misery and despair.

First pull-quote: “The No. 1 problem among blacks is the effects stemming from a very weak family structure.” He details the effects the welfare system begun in the 1960’s has had on black Americans with brutal honesty, excerpted below. (emphasis added)

“In 1960, just 22% of black children were raised in single-parent families. Fifty years later, more than 70% of black children were raised in single-parent families.”

“According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, that year 11% of black children were born to unwed mothers. Today about 75% of black children are born to unwed mothers.”

“At one time, almost all black families were poor, regardless of whether one or both parents were present. Today roughly 30% of blacks are poor. However, two-parent black families are rarely poor. Only 8% of black married-couple families live in poverty. Among black families in which both the husband and wife work full-time, the poverty rate is under 5%. Poverty in black families headed by single women is 37%.”

Slavery ended 154 years ago. Historically, black Americans fared well until the welfare system struck with a vengeance in the 1960’s…they’ve paid the price ever since.

“The undeniable truth is that neither slavery nor Jim Crow nor the harshest racism has decimated the black family the way the welfare state has.”

Facts don’t lie…but those directly responsible for inflicting that welfare system on an unfortunate black population do…and have been lying for a long time.

There’s more in the article, about how liberal policies and unions have wreaked havoc with black education and unemployment, and he finishes with a damning indictment:

“The most damage done to black Americans is inflicted by those politicians, civil rights leaders, and academics who assert that every problem confronting blacks is a result of a legacy of slavery and discrimination.”

Well worth the read, folks.

If by every measure, black Americans did better before the welfare system, and worse AFTER – there’s only one conclusion any reasonable person can reach.

Slavery isn’t the cause of current-day black misery…LIBERALISM IS THE CAUSE.

Think you can put that across to a BlackLivesMatter crowd, before they torch your car?

“The left is sitting on the biggest crime committed by a sitting president.”

We’ve been convinced of this for months: From special counsels to street riots, this is a deliberate Leftist meltdown orchestrated to deflect from illegalities committed by Obama and his team…and if they don’t find dirt on Pres Trump soon, it’s gonna get uglier.

That’s why Mueller has to go dumpster-diving years before Donald Trump decided to run for the presidency in 2015…because the special counsel, after months of digging can’t come up with a thing against the President during and after his 2016 campaign.

As the linked article by Greenfield points out, it’s the pattern of unmasking in order to spy on then-candidate and now-President Trump that “exposes the motive.”

“When we learn the whole truth (if we ever do), we will likely discover that Obama Inc. assembled a motley collection of different technically legal pretexts to spy on Trump’s team. Each individual pretext might be technically defensible. But together they add up to the crime of the century.”

The last administration was rotten to the core, and the only strategy they have going for them now is full-fledged attack on as many different fronts as possible, (unfortunately) for as long as possible…in order to stay in front of the mess they’re trying to conceal.

Sit down, and buckle up, because the rioting and violence will top anything we’ve seen to date, as President Trump’s administration gets closer to the real truth in this story.

Seriously, folks, we believe you ain’t seen nothing yet.

When it comes to federal handouts, sanctuary states have no shame.

California is about to go down an unconstitutional path, if legislature that just passed in Sacramento is signed by Governor Moonbeam, Jerry Brown…a clown’s clown.

Sanctuary status is not constitutional, and California lawmakers and its governor should be on a fast-track for recall if they violate their oath of office by enacting such a law.

They violate federal law, but scream if restricted from federal funds while doing so.

Disgusting.

California Governor oath of office:

“I (Governor) do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter.”

But, now, the Governor is about to sign ‘sanctuary state’ legislation?

So much for oaths…

Michael J. suggests we’re giving the President too much credit for wizardry…

Really?

If you knew there was a distinct possibility your campaign team was being surveilled, how hard would it be to, say, float an email to the team suggesting that Wisconsin (for instance) was hopeless…so, why campaign there at all, since it was going Democrat?

Blue-state Wisconsin was never visited by Hillary – why? Helloo – she lost Wisconsin.

She lost usually blue-walled Pennsylvania and Michigan as well. We’re saying (maybe) her time and efforts were being orchestrated by a campaign team that was putting too much faith in suspect captured communication information they thought to be infallible.

Hillary put time and effort in states she lost, and failed to put time and effort in states she should have won, but lost. Planted disinformation can be a wonderful thing, people.

But, okay, you Anti-Trumpers keep believing he’s a dunce and a political novice.

It’s worked to his advantage so far.