Metaphorically – think of it this way: an illegal act occurs (think ‘collusion’ or ‘meddling’), the police know…yet do nothing about it (think Obama’s team). A wad of currency from that illegal act is left on the sidewalk (think election results). Another pedestrian (Hillary) doesn’t see it – you find and enjoy that wad of cash (think Mr. Trump’s presidency).
How logical is it for you to be charged by police with a crime, when you didn’t know of or commit the crime that made found cash available in the first place?
Considering the administration in power at the time could have done something in the event of foreign meddling pre-election, but didn’t, they in effect colluded – not Trump.
Remember? Obama, it was very widely reported, told Russia “cut it out”. And, it was also reported, Obama said the voting process couldn’t actually be tampered with, so it was no big deal. It was obvious Obama knew what was happening, but did nothing.
Now, with confirming news that Trump’s campaign people were being surveilled by the FBI, CIA, and NSA, it’s totally ridiculous to suggest Obama wouldn’t have done anything if intercepts indicated Trump collusion was in fact occurring, and beyond ridiculous to assert nothing of that nature would have been leaked by now…IF collusion happened.
So we’re left with three inescapable facts:
- Lack of evidence, including absence of any leaks, proves President Trump had no active role in any interference, IF there was interference; and,
- There’s no logic trying to argue a Democrat president would not have discussed meddling (IF it occurred) with the Democrat candidate it could’ve affected; and,
- Obama, his team, AND Hillary, by their inaction, colluded with Russians – if there was interference going on that might have affected an election outcome.
Any reason for Obama’s inaction doesn’t matter. The fact they did nothing, by their own inaction, tacitly accepted any interference, and it’s bizarre on the face of it to hold Mr. Trump or any of his campaign team responsible for Team Obama’s incompetence.
Which means, by the way, the basis for special counsel Mueller is fraudulent.
Washington has a choice: Stop wasting taxpayer money on this special counsel fraud against President Trump, or switch its targeting to the REAL Colluder-in-Chief…
…Barack Hussein Obama. (But then, inevitably…some Democrat legal wag could always claim ‘prosecutorial discretion’ – so what’s the point?)