Ehhh? What say you, Democrats/Lefties/Socialists?

“…given our loose standards on the subject, why isn’t socialism a “hate crime”? After all, the evidence for its malignant effects is obvious to anyone with sufficient curiosity to look at the historical record. The socialist movement has been responsible for the murder, imprisonment, and torture of many millions, and perhaps hundreds of millions, of innocent people during its heyday in the twentieth century. That history of murder and tyranny continues on a smaller scale today in the handful of countries living under the misfortune of socialism—for example, Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam, and (more recently) Venezuela. How do socialists escape the indictment that, in view of the historical record, they are purveyors of tyranny and mass murder?”

(bold & underline emphasis added)

That’s the question posed in an article at The New Criterion.

Gotta be a warm, fuzzy feeling to vote AGAINST such ideology, RIGHT?

Breitbart headline…“Former Clinton Pollster: Hillary Clinton Broke Campaign Finance Laws, Not Donald Trump”

As Mark Penn, that ‘Former Clinton Pollster’ says today…

“Money paid to people who come out of the woodwork and shakedown people under threat of revealing bad sexual stories are not legitimate campaign expenditures. They are personal expenditures.” (underline, bold emphasis added)

He goes on to point out that actual criminal violations of law were committed by Hillary’s campaign and the Democrat National Committee who paid lawyers to front FusionGPS in the effort to build a dirt-dossier that WOULD negatively affect Trump’s campaign.

Here’s the money quote: “Contrast what is going on here with the treatment of the millions of dollars paid to a Democratic law firm which, in turn, paid out money to political research firm Fusion GPS and British ex-spy Christopher Steele without listing them on any campaign expenditure form — despite crystal-clear laws and regulations that the ultimate beneficiaries of the funds must be listed. This rule was even tightened recently. There is no question that hiring spies to do opposition research in Russia is a campaign expenditure, and yet, no prosecutorial raids have been sprung on the law firm, Fusion GPS or Steele. Reason: It does not “get” Trump.” (emphasis added)

What’s new here?

Turning a blind eye to Democrats…turning the screws on Republicans.

Folks, this whole thing stinks. Here you have an ‘investigation’ that was brought about by the unsubstantiated dirt-dossier to hurt a campaign, and the only principles being hounded are the targets of that dossier…and NOT the funders or creators of the lie.

It’s ludicrous…to see a lawyer pleading guilty to non-crimes…

…it’s heartbreaking…to see partisan prosecutors refusing to go after REAL crimes.

Princeton Policy Advisors report…

“In all, we estimate economic migrants will suffer 1.1 million traumatic or adverse events trying to reach the U.S. in 2018. This represents a predation rate of 144 percent. That is, those 711,000 migrants attempting to cross illegally into the U.S. this year will suffer on average 1.4 adverse events during the journey”

As the Washington Examiner notes, according to that report, it includes:

• 2,200 deaths;
• 180,000 rapes or coerced sex;
• 138,000 assaults;
• 81,000 cases of drug smuggling;
• 27,000 cases of human smuggling.

Such is the high cost illegal aliens pay when encouraged by Democrats to keep trying.

What decent human being is willing to accept that cost?

As a follow-on to our previous post, it should be noted that the manner in which Cohen decided to handle hush-money payments was his decision to make, not Trump’s.

And, as a lawyer, he should’ve known the right way to do things, and the wrong way… but giving him the benefit of the doubt – when Clinton’s aides weren’t charged with any in-kind campaign finance violations hushing Slick Willie’s female accusers…

…Cohen could very well have thought what he did was legal.

Besides…relying on a lawyer to do things in a legal manner is not a crime.

But arguing this matter is moot – since the law says hush-money isn’t illegal.

The panties-in-a-bunch crowd is delirious with joy over the convictions levied toward Trump’s lawyer Cohen and short-time campaign manager Manafort…but it’s forced.

Both men are being legally harassed because of their audacity to support Trump. If there’s any doubt about that, the information below will put those doubts to rest.

Manafort was convicted of crimes that occurred years ago, way before his stint with the candidate Trump, when he partnered with Democrat partisan Tony Podesta – and was given a pass then by Obama’s Justice Dept…because of that tie-in to a Clinton-ista.

As such, the Mueller push against him was to force cooperation against the President if there were any ‘Russia-collusion’ secrets he could be forced to reveal…but there aren’t.

Manafort was safe with Podesta…but radioactive as soon as he hitched to Trump.

Cohen set up corporations to paid $280k hush-money to 2 women, who claimed sex-trysts with private-citizen Trump years ago…seen as in-kind campaign contributions.

That amount, $280k, exceeded allowable amounts…but, as legal-eagle Andy McCarthy points out “The Justice Department has a history of treating serious campaign-finance transgressions as administrative violations, not felonies. A prominent example: The 2008 Obama campaign accepted nearly $2 million in illegal campaign contributions, but was permitted to settle the matter with a $375,000 fine.” (emphasis added)

Obama’s campaign finance violations amounted to $2 million, but was only fined. Yet when Cohen is found guilty of 1/10th the amount…he’s charged with a felony. Why?

He had the audacity to be connected to Trump.

One final note: while Cohen was subject to a maximum in-kind contribution amount of $2700, as the candidate, Donald Trump was not confined to that amount. He could have spent as much as he wanted…so criminal intent will be hard to prove.

(And a former head of the FEC says such payment isn’t a campaign contribution.)

Think about it folks…if hush-money paid to a woman is a campaign finance violation in that it helps a campaign, why weren’t Bill Clinton’s campaign team and aides ever prosecuted for the costly and extensive smear campaigns waged against his accusers?

Shouldn’t that type of ‘hush’ effort be considered an in-kind contribution? Just sayin’.

Bottom line – they’re just trying to make Trump supporters pay a heavy price.

One law for them…another law for the rest of us.

Another day, another distorted news cycle…what else is new?

Rudy Giuliani spoke truth to FakeNews…and now they try to distort the context in order to, once again, try to bring down the man who was constitutionally elected Nov 2016.

In an interview discussing why he didn’t want the President taken through a perjury-trap wringer by Mueller and his Democrat cohort, he stated ‘truth isn’t truth’…

…in the context of Mueller-as-prosecutor waiting to spring the trap is concerned.

But leave it to FakeNews to not report that context.

Alan Dershowitz, a Left-wing legal expert, explains exactly what Giuliani was saying.

But the good news is, more and more Americans see through out-of-context FakeNews efforts, and even as they step up attempts to smear…Trumps approval numbers rise…

…yet they show no inclination to change their tactics.

We can’t begin to imagine their desperation as more deep-state chicanery is exposed.

It’s obvious why Democrats are okay with this, but that doesn’t make it right. We’ve said it before, we’ll say it again – the ‘special counsel’ probe of President Trump is wrong.

Our Constitution establishes the government branches and their boundaries. It’s built on a ‘Rule-of-Law’ concept, but that’s been bastardized to allow this travesty to continue.

Only a lawyer – a far-Left one, specifically – could justify what’s going on in DC today.

Our laws state a special counsel can only be assigned when a specific crime exists, and then, under those circumstances, a criminal investigation is (or has been) launched.

If an Attorney General imposes special counsel in a counter-intelligence situation, there should at the very least be some evidence of wrongdoing that may lead to indictments.

But here we have a special counsel extraordinaire, established without evidence or an iota of wrongdoing, seemingly with unending authority to go wherever he chooses, and supposedly, without any constraints by any Constitutionally established authority.

Any honest American should be appalled at this un-Constitutional travesty.

In a free Nation enabled by its Constitution, it’s un-American to allow it’s abomination.

And it’s appalling to realize the depths of iniquity to which Republicans have sunk.

“It’s time to end the profiteering from information gathered on Americans’ behalf for cynical, partisan political use. We should end privileged access to our nation’s secrets.”

We enthusiastically agree with this Investor’s Business Daily article.

An apolitical implementation of removing security clearances of former gov’t workers makes complete and total sense…why should they parlay ‘clearances for cash’?

Besides, Democrats never had problems with stripping security clearances for political reasons, obviously, so they should welcome an apolitical solution with open arms…

…right?

For a former CIA director, John Brennan isn’t too smart.

By word and deed, undermining America’s leader gives aid to America’s enemy.

Accusing a sitting President of treason, absent evidence, would be ludicrous if it wasn’t so dangerous; what part of that wouldn’t an intelligent former CIA director understand?

But, sadly, as with so many on the Left, he’d rather see America go down in flames…

…then act like a Loyal Opposition.

Brennan’s the ‘domestic enemy’ poster-boy of Constitution protection requirements, and by his disloyal vitriol, personifies the treasonous acts of which he accuses others.

He has no evidence when accusing others, but every time he opens his mouth on TV…

…he provides MORE evidence of his treason.

…show them this…

“HISTORIC! Black Business Ownership Under Trump Jumps 400% in ONE YEAR“

Thanks, Gateway Pundit.