Molester! We saw you in the act.
When? Can’t remember.
Where? Not sure.
Witnesses? 3 or 4…maybe 6-8, names uncertain.
Who cares, anyway…it’s the seriousness of the charge that’s important here.
Prove your innocence.
Molester! We saw you in the act.
When? Can’t remember.
Where? Not sure.
Witnesses? 3 or 4…maybe 6-8, names uncertain.
Who cares, anyway…it’s the seriousness of the charge that’s important here.
Prove your innocence.
Blumenthal, an undeserving senator for Connecticut, lied about serving in Vietnam.
It strikes a false note now, to claim ‘credibility’ as an important issue to him.
Regardless of the issue: Since when does he care about credibility?
The ‘politics ain’t beanbag’ quote is attributed to an 1890s fictional ‘Dooley’ character, written by Finley Peter Dunne, a chief editorial writer for the Chicago Post, meant as a retort to politicians of the day complaining about ‘rough-and-tumble’ campaigning.
Democrats and media, with a despicable anti-Kavanaugh campaign, take it lower.
We’re being subjected now to the Scum-Bag world of Democrat politics.
Washington Examiner op-ed: ‘Democrats claim there’s now a pattern of abusive behavior by Kavanaugh’…but – while the pattern’s there – the abusers are…
…the Democrats.
11th hour theatrics using despicable UNPROVEN allegations DEFINE ‘abusive’…
…and especially abusive if an accuser claims to forget ‘when’ it allegedly occurred, ‘where’ it allegedly happened, and ‘who’ else was allegedly involved or witnessed it…
…thus affording the accused NO OPPORTUNITY to defend themselves.
And calling for FBI probes AFTER withholding information that could’ve been included in the original FBI background checks is nothing more than political theater, writ large.
Pattern of abusive behavior? You bet.
And the politicians conducting it should be sanctioned.
Next time a Left-wing acquaintance hurls the ‘Kavanaugh-accusers-must-be-believed-without-proof’ screed in your face, just ask them why they molested the little old lady.
When they deny the accusation, explain to them that you witnessed it; you’re just not sure ‘when’ it happened, ‘where’ it happened, or how many others saw it happen.
Then, sit back and enjoy the hypocrisy.
“Consumer Confidence Jumps to 18-Year High on Strong Trump Economy”
As NewsMax.com reports: “U.S. consumer confidence surged to an 18-year high in September as households grew more upbeat about the labor market, pointing to sustained strength in the economy” The only ones surprised will be Democrats.
“Economists polled by Reuters had forecast the consumer index slipping to a reading of 132.0 this month from the previously reported 133.4 in August.” (emphasis added)
Cue ‘unexpected’ hysteria – but were those polled economists living in Siberian caves?
Seriously – household income…UP. New unemployment claims…DOWN. Minority and Women unemployment at historic LOWS. Manufacturing-jobs sector…GROWING…
…how hard can it be to read consumer confidence tea-leaves?
As the FakeNews cycle goes berserk covering an allegation of an ancient unproven claim against a Republican…it’s silent over real-time allegations against a Democrat.
There’s NO evidence against the Republican, but there is against the Democrat.
Which exposes their concept: Innocent…until proven Republican.
Sadly, even Republicans perpetuate this idiocy, as proven by this NY Post headline: “Murkowski backs FBI probe into Kavanaugh accusations“
Open message to Murkowski: Democrats really don’t want a probe, just sound-bytes. If they wanted a probe…they would have sent the accusing claim to the FBI in July.
Alaska doesn’t deserve this weak-kneed Republican for a Senator.
“Gallup: GOP Has Highest Favorability Rating in 7 Years“
Latest Gallup polling indicates a huge shift in Democrat-Republican favorability, with the GOP taking the lead from Democrats after decades of ‘leading from behind’.
Could this be indicative of a) the disgust many have with Democrat tactics, b) the strong economy, booming as a result of Republican policies, or c) a combination of the two?
Daily Caller headline…“Democratic Candidate Says Shooting Match Should Show Who Best Supports Second Amendment”
So what? Since when does bullseye accuracy negate ‘lockstep’ party-line voting?
Happens every time: a politician can say whatever they want on the campaign trail, but once in office… they toe the Democrat party line, or kiss their effectiveness goodbye.
Hopefully, enough ‘undecided’ voters will remember this in November.
The media and their Democrat lapdogs forced her into the limelight.
Those who EXPOSED the Kavanaugh accuser are playing the ‘fear-of-violence’ card, in a way meant to justify when the accuser backs out of hearings, to prolong their deceit.
How do they get away with that logic?