Another day, another round of angst over what Brett did when he was 16.

This ain’t rocket science folks…what 50-yr-old filling out a job application would be taken over the expurgatory interview coals for his teen-age life experiences?

At the risk of repetition…there’s NO CORROBORATION OR PROOF of sexual assault, so now they’re reduced to…how much beer a teen-ager consumed on any given night.

35 years later, it’s not germane to a street-sweeping job…

…much less a Supreme Court justice. (with apologies to street-sweepers everywhere)

It’s a disgrace that the Democrats are performing this relentless smear tactic, and it’s despicable that their FakeNews media masters are perpetuating that disgrace.

We can’t help but believe such despicable behavior will backfire in November.

Breitbart News headline says it all: “Snoop Dogg Calls Kanye West an ‘Uncle Tom’ for Supporting America First Agenda”

Sssoooo…supporting an agenda that boosts minority opportunity is…bad?

Hey, ‘Snoop’…by your definition, Martin Luther King was an Uncle Tom.

By what logic can policies that create jobs, improve take-home pay, and expand over-all prosperity for the black community be considered worthy of contempt and ridicule?

In every measurable metric, opportunities for minorities have grown exponentially with the Trump administration and Republican Congress, as compared to the Obama years.

In Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel, Uncle Tom – through passive resistance – braved cruel death to save several black women who dared to escape from slavery. So, if, by ‘Uncle Tom’ the ‘Dogg’ is describing Kanye as a brave black man who stands up for the black community oppressed by centuries of Democrat policy…he’s right.

Otherwise (at the risk of offending the Social Justice Warrior crowd)…

…Snoop Dogg’s a foolish, disgusting stooge caricature of old-world black hucksters working the auction blocks for black Nigeria and Ghana slave-traders, because…

“The white man did not introduce slavery to Africa . . . . men with dark skin had become quite comfortable with the concept of man as property . . . . Long before the arrival of Europeans on West Africa’s coast, the two continents shared a common acceptance of slavery as an unavoidable and necessary—perhaps even desirable—fact of existence…Slavery was not a twisted European manipulation, although Europe capitalized on a mutual understanding and greedily expanded the slave trade into what would become a horrific enterprise . . . . It was a thunder that had no sound. Tribe stalked tribe, and eventually more than 20 million Africans would be kidnapped in their own homeland” (emphasis added) (thanks to HistoryNewsNetwork.org)

Democrat policies have ruined the black family, destroyed black opportunities, and kept them in velvet shackles with sweet talk of government handouts…but some are now waking to the reality of what’s transpired, and realizing they’ve been duped for decades.

Kanye West doesn’t care what kind of men create GOOD policy that makes the black life better…he just cares that these are policies that MAKE Black Lives Better.

Dogg? Do you prefer high unemployment and less opportunity for blacks? Because that’s the world the black community lived in under eight years of Obama-&-Democrats.

Hard to understand Snoop’s logic, unless…maybe his cornrows are pulled too tight?

Predictions as to the FBI findings report:

Location: UNCERTAIN (accuser befuddled, somewhere in Maryland?)

Date of Event: UNKNOWN (accuser vague, sometime in 80s?)

Witnesses: NONE FOUND (those id’d by accuser deny her claim)

We refer the Senate Judiciary committee to 6 prior FBI background reports in depth, where no such allegations or hints of controversy occurred during hundreds of interviews conducted by dozens of agents. All indications are any event that may have occurred went unreported, and unremembered, since that time.

Paraphrasing former Dir. Comey, we find no reasonable prosecutor would, under such circumstances and absent corroboration, proof, or evidence, attempt opening a case.

Respectfully submitted this 5th day of October, 2018.

Sr. Agent-In-Charge Elliot Ness

Ugliest take-away from the accuser-v-Kavanaugh hearing last week was the sight of Senate Democrats, virtually all degreed lawyers, spurning presumption of innocence…

…a fundamental concept of rule-of-law. So is burden-of-proof, similarly disregarded.

Hence the ‘ugliest’ assertion: for legal minds to perform such a lawless act can ONLY be because of the political expedience of their disgraceful treatment of Kavanaugh.

NO OTHER REASON IS POSSIBLE.

Did we mention they’re ALL degreed lawyers and legislators who MAKE law?

Presumption-of-innocence and burden-of-proof concepts are not casually disposable commodities. In any other setting, these ‘legislators’ would be up on ethics charges.

Oppose Kavanaugh for ideological reasons…but not for this political ambush.

At the end of the day, American concepts of justice are at stake. For a Senator to vote against Kavanaugh for such politically expedient purposes violates their oath of office.

For those Senators who may have forgotten, they swore to “…support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

Asserting ‘credibility’ to baseless allegations, by spurning rule-of-law ideals for burden of proof and presumption of innocence, does not “bear true faith and allegiance”.

What worse abuse of office could a lawmaker perform…than to TRAMPLE rule-of-law?

Democrat voters once again are faced with a choice – continue voting for such ethically challenged political operatives, or rebuke them…vote GOP…to negate such behavior.

Failing that, Senators/Representatives making public statements to smear Kavanaugh with such ugly tactics should be impeached by the House, and tried by the Senate.

Those accused, of course, would not be eligible to sit as jury in the Senate trial, and as it only seems to be Democrats who have violated their oath, conviction is guaranteed.

If that doesn’t shut down rule-of-law ethics abuse, we don’t know what will.

We repeat, for clarity…

Allowing bad behavior GUARANTEES more bad behavior.

Anyone who has kids knows this, and it doesn’t change that much as people get more mature…it just gets more complex in the depth of the manipulative, calculating nature.

Whether your middle-schooler or your congressman, failing to correct bad behavior will add to the problem…the sooner ‘moderate’ Republicans understand this, the better.

Those who whine about an accuser ‘being heard, so, she must be credible’…ignore the very basic concept of PROOF – without that fundamental key, no one is safe.

Anyone has a right to come forward, but no one has a ‘right’ to be believed. Conflating one with the other is meant to unfairly force an emotional element into the equation.

Sunday’s interview of Senator Cotton (R-AR) on CBS is a case in point. The interviewer tried to force the Senator into conceding credibility to an accuser simply because she came forward, totally ignoring the fact not a shred of corroboration or proof existed.

“DICKERSON: You said when we last talked in November, “I think it’s important that women feel they can come forward. That’s a good change in the norms and the expectations of our society.” A woman came forward here. And you’re saying basically she said nothing credible. How can women come forward, if when they do they’re- they’re told they’re not credible?” (bold emphasis added)

That last sentence is key – FakeNews and their Democrat cohort would have us believe the credibility of an accuser, with NO proof or corroboration, cannot be questioned.

To them, the seriousness of the charge is all that matters…lack of evidence be damned.

(For that matter – in the case of Kavanaugh’s accuser – overwhelming evidence that she ISN’T CREDIBLE be damned: she’s a woman, he’s a Trump nominee…’nuff said.)

This turns centuries of settled law upside down, but, hey…when it’s a Republican or a Trump nominee in the crosshairs, all bets are off, and rule-of-law no longer applies.

Disgusting.

Sorry liberals, you can’t win an argument founded on an unAmerican principle of guilt-by-accusation, and by the way, undeserving-Senator Blumenthal blew the accuser out of the water, when he brought up the ‘lie-a-little, lie-all-the-time’ legal screed.

(The term in Latin is ‘falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus‘ which means if a witness is shown to have lied about one thing, one can assume they’ve lied about everything.)

First, Ford’s own alleged party-mates say her claims aren’t true. Second, she stalled a Senate hearing by claiming a fear of flying…when her habits PROVE she flies all the time. So if a shown ‘once-liar’ can be legitimately termed a serial liar…there you have it.

That said, no corroboration, proof, or evidence is provided to support her claim, either.

Whether Balsey-Ford is a confused victim or deceitful Democrat activist shill is actually beside the point…Guilt-By-Accusation isn’t part of the rule of law, and never has been.

Innocent-til-proven-guilty is the concept we live by. But, still, irony drips.

Seems odd that the Party of the waitress-sandwich and Slick Willie Clinton predation is getting panties in a bunch over unsubstantiated 35-yrs-past teenage binge parties, no?

After all, the Kennedy-Clinton excesses were provable…

…but, lucky for them…they were in the right Party.

Leonard M., whom we must admit is a VERY dedicated Liberal, tries to make the case that an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh would somehow be different than what’s already occurred, but we’re guessing he just doesn’t understand the process.

The FBI gets statements from people, in this case, people who already submitted sworn statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee swearing Ms. Ford’s claim is wrong.

So, the FBI would just go get…the SAME statements…’cuz, guess what?

Those submitting sworn statements under penalty of felony aren’t likely to change those statements just because an FBI agent knocks on their door…they’ll swear the same.

Senate Democrats demanding an FBI probe KNOW THIS…but hope you don’t.

(And, did we mention Leonard is very dedicated?)

The four major takeaways from today’s ‘hearing‘…

• While it’s a given that any allegation of sex-abuse must be heard, Ms. Ford had NO corroboration, proof, or evidence to support her claim that, if she was sexually assaulted as a teenager, Kavanaugh was the perpetrator;
• Brett Kavanaugh (rightfully) asserted at every opportunity the very ‘witnesses’ to the event (as claimed by Ms. Ford) all refute her claim, under penalty of perjury;
• Democrats, unable to counter that Ms. Ford’s identified ‘witnesses’ all refuted her claim, had to fall back on the ‘we-need-an-FBI-investigation’ delay tactic;
• Senate Republicans finally had on their Big-Boy pants today, slamming Senate Democrats for their delay tactics in the hearing process, i.e.
  • Feinstein kept secret Ms. Ford’s complaint letter since the end of July;
  • Failed to submit it to the Chairman, or address it in their interview process;
  • Failed to ask the FBI to check out the information in a timely manner;
  • Yet complained that Republicans wouldn’t (now) delay the hearing for an FBI probe they could have justified…if they’d presented the claim originally.

Especially forceful was GOP Senator Lindsey Graham’s blistering takedown of the way in which Senate Democrat Ranking Chair Feinstein manipulated the process.

If nothing else, watch his withering tirade.

South Carolina…you can be proud of that guy this afternoon.

Brett Kavanaugh showed a lot more reserve than we preferred (hoping during every Democrat question about ‘why not delay for an FBI probe?’ that he would suggest they ask their Democrat leadership why that hadn’t been done WEEKS AGO.)

But, finally, Republican Senators started throwing that question back at them.

Based on this hearing…there’s no good reason to delay a vote…or confirmation.

Never have we been so proud of Senate Republicans…

…and so ashamed of Senate Democrats.

“Ms. Ford, other than anonymous ‘friends’ who say you told them of the event AFTER 30 years, do you have any corroborating proof or evidence of your accusations?”