‘Finding truth and confronting it fearlessly’ is the last thing they’ll do

NeverTrump’ers, true to form, all have one thing in common: their derangement as a group interferes with any ability to see facts, symbolized by this David French column.

His article sub-heading “Let’s find the truth and confront it fearlessly” is ironic, as his first few paragraphs attempt to set up an argument built on a false premise…that is, the proven abuse of FISA warrant applications is somehow a ‘fatally flawed’ theory.

It’s an established, settled law that FISA applications are to be based on verified data.

As a lawyer, you’d think Mr. French could understand that concept, but his disdain for anything Trump, as with his NeverTrump cohort, blinds him to such proven realities.

Which begs the question – is there an HONEST NeverTrump’er out there?

  • FACT – The FISA applications were not based on (required) verified data;
  • FACT – The infamous Steele dirt-dossier has never been corroborated;
  • FACT – The Russian ‘hack’ of DNC emails was never verified by American law enforcement…because they’ve never had access to the server, or the scene;
  • FACT – Meeting with others to discuss available opposition info is not illegal;
  • FACT – Absence of a collusion crime means this has all been a HOAX.

Is it possible for you to CONFRONT that truth fearlessly, Mr. French?

BlueCollar Called It…Preident says if Congress won’t fund southern border wall, military will build it

Yesterday, BlueCollar noted a report that the President actually UPPED the military budget in a departure from former remarks that the budget might need to be lowered.

BlueCollar queried in that blog whether his decision to go billions higher may be because adding billions could pay for a southern border wall Congress won’t fund.

Now, in today’s Washington Times, headlined Trump: If Democrats hold back on border wall, the military will build it” looks like we predicted accurately…again.

We may be blue-collar, we may not be political experts, but we are the man-on-the-street…and that’s the mentality President Trump brings to Washington DC.

(UPDATE) BlueCollar beat Rush Limbaugh to the prediction as well…he began his daily broadcast today discussing the President’s sudden hike in military funding saying it “looks like an end run” (around Democrats who are stalling wall funding he wants).

Msg to Congress: be careful what you wish for…

Nadler: Hush Payments May Be ‘Impeachable Offenses’

As noted in a previous blog, non-disclosure agreements with financial incentives are the same thing as ‘hush-money’ and, considering the millions Congress has spent with our TAX-$$, they might be well advised to think twice about idle ‘impeachable’ threats.

Unless, of course, they mean to purge their own as well?

For that matter, EVERY NDA is a hush-document…including those of Congress

Congress has paid out over $15 million in hush-money NDA’s, going back years, and the worst part of that fact is THEY USED TAXPAYER DOLLARS for those payments.

Getting panties in a bunch over NDA’s that Trump arranged doesn’t pass a smell test for two reasons – first, it was while he was a private citizen, second, it was his money.

If the American public should be outraged, focus on the tainted political leaders who use our tax-dollars, WHILE IN POLITICAL OFFICE, to veil and/or obscure their imbroglios.

Uhhh…what about the hidden million$ paid by Democrats for the hoax-dossier, to affect elections?

FakeNews rears its ugly head.

Another day, another effort to smear President Trump over thousands paid out to women who reportedly had a private relationship with him in years long past.

Now, again, opposition forces accuse him of ‘illegal campaign funding’, but…

thousands?

Democrats hid payment of MILLIONS to a lawyer cut-out firm which in turn funded a hoax-dossier through FusionGPS, who used a foreign national for creating the lies.

That dirt-dossier was meant for one thing – to derail the 2016 Trump campaign.

Did we say MILLIONS?

Where’s the outrage? Just another example of FakeNews selective reporting.

If Democrats can claim thousands in hush payments as an ‘impeachable offense’, what are the MILLIONS Hillary and the DNC spent, trying to regain election momentum?

Opposition creates high-stress environment, then condemns those burnt out from stress?

As the fake angst over White House turnover awakens to another day, it shouldn’t be too difficult for reasoning adults to see the hypocrisy of those bemoaning ‘turmoil’.

90%+ negative media coverage, constant anti-GOP political nattering by the opposition, deep-state leakers, and a 2-year hoax ‘collusion’ witch-hunt wears on people. There’s no wonder that, under such conditions, those choosing to serve burn out over time.

Hopefully, the American electorate realize this faux angst for what it is…

…just one more effort to diminish and neuter the Trump administration, and send out the message…this is what you get when you dare to serve against deep-state elitists.

Mueller’s odd persecution of Corsi raises more questions than answers

American Thinker contributor Moseley raises some interesting points today in his article  “Jerome Corsi Challenges Robert Mueller” and the inevitable court battle looming.

Corsi says he’s being hounded by Mueller-&-Co to lie about an alleged ‘collusion’ with WikiLeaks founder Assange, based on communications regarding DNC email hacks.

Mueller’s team alleges Corsi had advanced information on that WikiLeaks effort, but the communications they use to establish that claim occurred after multiple news sources had published articles on the WikiLeaks actions, as well as future promised reveals.

Basically, Corsi’s being blamed for advance knowledge of what was already published.

But, more interesting than that contortionist effort by Mueller is the timeline.

First Hillary-email releases by WikiLeaks came in March, 2016. The DNC server ‘hack’ (which was actually proven to be a memory-stick download) occurred on July 5, 2016 and in a bizarre twist, the Democrat Nat’l Committee refused FBI access to the server.

(And, to this date, never has provided access to that server.)

But, there’s another oddity involved here: while every Democrat on planet Earth claims in no uncertain terms that Republicans are involved in the DNC server fiasco, there’s a little known fact that a Bernie Sanders-supporting DNC aide was murdered 5 days later.

5 days after the DNC download, on July 10, 2016, Seth Rich was killed in DC, and his murder, written off as a ‘bungled mugging’, has never been solved. Coincidence?

There’ve been allegations that Rich was the WikiLeaks source. Timing is suggestive.

At the end of the day, it’s odd that Mueller would push Corsi on a WikiLeaks non-issue and beyond bizarre that, in doing so, is willing to keep a cloud over the Democrat Party.

They’ve embraced dog-killers and wife-beaters…why not a cop-hater?

BlueCollar doesn’t follow the NFL anymore, largely due to the take-a-knee deceit that chooses to push lies about widespread racism and police brutality in America.

This, AFTER America elected a black man for president…twice. And though there may be traces of police brutality, omitting the context of crime commission seems deceitful.

That said, we see no reason why NFL teams should spurn Kaepernick, unless his ability doesn’t meet their expectations or requirements – after all, a team’s objective is to win.

Besides, they’ve signed suspected murderers, woman-abusers, and dog-killers

…why not a cop-hater?

Fans of fired FBI Dir. Comey may want to start that bail-bond-funding effort

“FBI email chain may provide most damning evidence of FISA abuses yet”

John Solomon, award-winning journalist for The Hill, drops another bombshell.

Congress has revealed emails between (then) FBI Dir. Comey, FBI agents, and DoJ lawyers, sent BEFORE the FISA warrant process started, which proves 1) the FBI knew the dossier was unsubstantiated, and 2) the FBI knew its author was talking to media.

Congressional members added these emails to the list of items they’d like declassified.

The reason why the emails between Comey, agents, and the DoJ lawyers are damning has to do with the FISA warrant applied for AFTER these emails were communicated.

There’s a notation on the warrant that says “…the FBI is UNAWARE of any derogatory information pertaining to Source #1” (Source #1 is Steele, the dossier author)

But those emails prove the FBI WAS aware of derogatory information, i.e. that the data was unsubstantiated, and WAS aware that its author, Steele, was talking to media.

Looks like Mr. Integrity and his cohort may be fitted for orange jumpsuits…soon.