At the Gateway Pundit: “Stunning! Schiff’s Monday ‘Witness’ Fiona Hill was NOT at WH at Time of July Call – And Worked for George Soros for Six Years!” 

Got that?

House Democrats are holding ‘hearings’ behind closed doors, locking key Republicans out, keeping the entire process secret, refusing to make any inquiry Constitutional…

…questioning ‘key’ witnesses who weren’t there…

…who (formerly) worked for George Soros?

This will certainly strain the limits of FakeNews.

“Nearly Two-Thirds of House GOP Backs Bill to Censure Adam Schiff”

Schiff lied about no contact with their gossip-monger…err…’whistleblower’…and lied publicly about the telephone conversation our President had with the Ukrainian leader.

Lies that were specifically intended to smear and undermine a sitting President.

And, furthermore, continues an ‘impeachment’ illusion while trampling due process and rule of law basics that are bedrock principles of the Constitution he swore to uphold.

And only ‘NEARLY’ two-thirds of the House GOP backs a bill to censure Schiff?

So far, with the Russia-Ukraine fiasco proving any and all collusion/corruption/whatever has been conducted by Democrats, it’s high time to subpoena Democrat tax records.

That is…if proof and/or evidence are any justification.

(You know…the rule-of-law ‘due process’ thing they seem very willing & able to ignore.)

Just sayin’…

Remember ‘Russia, Russia, Russia’?

For 2 years+, so-called journalists ran un-founded story after un-founded story alleging collusion, cover-ups, and corruption amongst Donald Trump-&-Co…based on bias…

…all to bring down, at first, a candidate…then, an elected President.

Now, it’s ‘Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine’?

We’re hearing un-founded story after un-founded story alleging cover-up, corruption, and quid-pro-quo against Pres. Trump-&-Co…based on the same bias and objective…

..to take down President Donald J Trump.

Anonymous sources, deliberate lies…none of it challenged by honest media.

Yeah, ‘democracy dies in darkness’…and NOTHING kills real journalism like bias.

(But don’t just believe us…look at media-trust polling.)

By their actions, they’ve changed the task of reporting truth to destroying opponents.

Judging by their sinking trust-polls, as compared to Trump’s rising poll numbers…

…they’re the ones being destroyed.

You’d think even if vanity wouldn’t stop their insanity…self-preservation would.

Census data is reporting median household income is at its highest point ever.

Democrats have NO alternative: they must impeach…FAST.

Otherwise, Americans will keep winning.

Good question on the Rush Limbaugh show, in the middle of the 2nd hour.

China’s leadership raged over a tweet an NBA team owner sent out in support of Hong Kong citizens demonstrating for their freedom, saying all Chinese were insulted.

How could they be, if Twitter is banned in China?

Want some real irony?

NBA teams are made up of approximately 85% black players. And, yet, the brutal and widespread oppressive actions of Hong Kong police are okay with most NBA players?

You know, the same players decrying brutal/oppressive behavior by American police.

What’s the difference? China has billions invested in the NBA and its sponsorships.

One would almost suspect financial motives behind such a 180.

“GOP member of Judiciary Committee not allowed in Fiona Hill deposition”

If any Party is killing democracy, it’s the Democrat Party.

Aided and abetted by FakeNews media.

We suggest the GOP members who were in the hearing should pull a Schiff…

…and LEAK that deposition.

Here’s a ‘what if’ for you…what if the ‘anonymous whistleblower’ is Robert deNiro?

At NRO, Andrew McCarthy’s article “What Is Impeachment For?” speaks to the act of impeachment as being ‘…a political process, not a legal one’ but then, bends the curve.

On the issue of what is impeachable conduct he notes…

“There is considerable debate among legal scholars about what kind of conduct impeachment should apply to. Some say that it is limited to abuse of presidential power. Others counter that it applies to anything that demonstrates an incumbent’s unfitness. I adhere to the latter position, but it is not clear-cut.” (bold, underline emphasis added)

Hmmm…‘ANYTHING that demonstrates unfitness’? 

Other than actual election-meddling criminality that affected its outcome, we fail to see how an astute legal-eagle like Andrew McCarthy could make such a preference.

We thought the election process that involved combined sentiment of a Nation was the proper method to determine an incumbent’s unfitness. Got old PRE-presidential dirt?

Tell us…then, let elections decide.

Usually, we bow to Andrew McCarthy’s wisdom…in this case, respectfully, he’s wrong.

Does anyone believe there’d be a closed-door strategy if House Democrats had any solid grounds to talk impeachment?

“Jane Fonda Arrested While Protesting in D.C.”

We have an idea…