Irony, defined…using our tax$ for their impeachment scam has helped 45’s fundraising HUGELY

How ironic is this?

“Trump Has Fundraised More from Impeachment Than Democrats Spent on It”

House Democrats used our tax-dollars to push their SHAMpeachment hoax, and as a result, President Trump has his highest approval numbers…higher than ‘O at his point.

Adding ‘Trumpian’ insult to Democrat injury…

“…the Trump campaign raised $5 million on the day of the impeachment vote – and an additional $10 million in the two days following it. The Republican National Committee has gained 600,000 new donors since the impeachment inquiry began.
For every taxpayer dollar the Democrats invested in impeachment circus the Trump campaign gained fivein just three days.” 
(bold, underline emphasis added)

Finally – a Democrat spending program we can appreciate.

Hmmm “…NO trial is required for the Senate to acquit…anyone impeached by the House”

(‘Cuz the U.S. Constitution RULES, baby!!)

Once again the mainstream media lets us down, to keep the clown show going.

In 1993 the U.S. Supreme Court held that, in a 9-0 ruling “…no trial is required for the Senate to acquit, or convict, anyone impeached by the House of Representatives.”

“The case is Nixon v. United States, 506 U.S. 224 (1993).”

According to the Constitution, the House has SOLE power to impeach, and the Senate has the SOLE power to try impeachments. “The Senate has no authority to determine what conduct is impeachable or what process the House uses to impeach. On the other hand, the House has no authority over the Senate’s sole power to acquit, or convict, or the process invoked to either end.” (bold and underline emphasis added)

Let that sink in. A 26-year old SCOTUS ruling destroys this House Democrat hoax.

You wouldn’t know it based on all the media hype legitimizing the illegitimate.

Talk about a journalism FAIL…FakeNews, truly, is the enemy of the people.

Otherwise, the Pelosi-Nadler-Schiff clown show would die of humiliation.

The Senate should end this charade. Some argue a ‘trial’ could help expose the totality of Democrat chicanery (including Ukraine corruption) but this would be a fool’s errand.

Republicans historically have displayed amazing incompetence against FakeNews, and they should not make the mistake in believing such a trial would be any different now.

They are NOT Donald Trump: he can beat FakeNews…they can’t.

McConnell should expose the vacuous nature of their charges, and dismiss them.

PERIOD.

Then, let the President handle the FakeNews hysteria that ensues…

…until the NEXT impeachment effort begins…

…and so on, and so on, and so on.

You’d think FBI-&-CIA types moonlighting as ‘plumbers’ would’ve been a little more competent

Looks like all roads lead to Ukraine, which isn’t surprising when considering the level of corruption – tens of billions, wise – that’s flowed through there over the last 5-6 years.

No wonder the President’s phone call to the new Ukrainian leader lit the Democrats on fire…with the CIA setting it up overseas, and the FBI here at home, the con was on…

…and, now, Democrats are exposed.

One can only hope the media’s over-confident ‘Hillary-for-the-win’ polling was the factor that made so many career spooks, spies, and sycophants end up the Keystone Kops.

Because, otherwise, our law enforcement and intelligence agencies S.U.C.K. 

The huge scandal of this new century is the weaponizing of those agencies against rival political opponents, but just as worrisome is the level of incompetence by those players.

Scandal-wise, it’s Watergate on steroids

…professionally, it’s a clown show.

Let’s hope some real adults have begun to take over in the FBI and CIA.

Even liberal media knows THEY did what he’s being impeached for

It’s worth repeating…

Democrats sought Ukrainian help against Trump pre-election, 2016. Then there’s this…

…reported by CNN in April, 2017: “White House press secretary Sean Spicer repeated Trump’s claim and cited Fox News’ reporting about GCHQ’s surveillance to reporters in the briefing room. “Judge Andrew Napolitano made the following statement, quote, ‘Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command (to spy on Trump). He didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA … he used GCHQ,'” Spicer told journalists.” (bold, u/’emphasis added)

Five-Eyes ally nations (Australia/Britain/Italy, etc) provided intelligence and foreign service assistance to set up lures and conduct surveillance on the Trump campaign.

It’s documented…with Mifsud, Halper, Downer, and former senior intelligence officials of those foreign nations on record as doing so. Now, contrast that with the Impeached-but-based-on-NO-proof situation of Donald Trump…even never-Trump’ers know it’s wrong.

(They won’t admit it, but they know it’s wrong.)

But this is where the President shines…being in the right, and unfairly attacked by those who (in some cases by self-admission) are guilty of the very acts he’s charged with.

He’s a master strategist handling such a situation…polling will continue to climb.

And, when the OTHER shoe drops exposing Democrat chicanery…fireworks.

Which ‘stain’ do you think will be remembered?

Democrats stained their britches in a pathetic effort to force a ‘stain’ of impeachment on the Trump presidency, and their media masters are abuzz…but considering results…

which of those ‘stained’ will be remembered?

A president impeached for Democrat sins…or desperate Democrats dodging reality?

Judging by rising poll numbers and new-supporter cash donations, it’s pretty clear.

Democrats will need super effective dry-cleaning to remove their self-inflicted stain.

(Of course, Nov 2020 is still 11 months away. Expect more ‘staining’ efforts.)