The inevitable apologist asks for ‘5 good reasons’ to kill the deal.

Asking for 5 good reasons why the Iran deal should go down in flames begs the question…when is it ever a good idea to give terror sponsors nuclear capability?

Getting past that, the following are additional convincing reasons to kill the deal…

2) Iran is recognized universally as the global leader in sponsoring terror;

3) Iran would receive $150+ BILLION in sanctions relief as part of the deal, without any assurances that the billions would not be used to fund more terror acts;

4) Iran would be allowed to continue and EXPAND NUCLEAR efforts;

5) The ‘deal’ does not allow America to participate in monitoring inspections;

6) The ‘deal’ allows ONLY Iran to provide inspections of what they’ve done so far;

7) The ‘deals’ so-called ‘snapback’ sanction capability is neutered by language that says sanctions CAN’T be ‘snapped back’ once they’ve been waived/rescinded;

8) The deal ignores major facilities involved in their weaponizing aspects, and aren’t part of the deal in terms of ANY inspection process;

9) The Obama administration has openly admitted (as far back as 2010) that Iran is, has been, and continues working with al-Qaeda;

10) The Iranian long-range ballistic missile program doesn’t belong in a ‘deal’ that was only supposed to be about a nuclear program (unless of course you consider that they’re only meant for deployment of nuclear warheads);

11) America, as part of the deal, is REQUIRED to aid Iran in PROTECTING the program of which we are not allowed inspection verification capabilities?

If any sane person got past the first sentence and its question without having real doubts, did they get past #2…#3…surely not #4…before realizing it’s a bad deal?

And we never got into the ‘we refuse any inspections that will discover how badly we violated past sanctions’ verbiage…

…that defies determining where any ‘deal’ starting point should be!

(B-T-W, all of the above can be verified on a universal group of news sites. So, it’s fruitless for apologists to dismiss the above as ‘Fox News’ talking points.)

Apologists should produce hard evidence that refutes the above…or shut up.

And please…spare us the NBC/ABC/CBS empty talking points.

Now 3rd world nations want reparations every time a storm passes through?

Who is surprised this was coming?

First, it’s egocentric in the extreme to believe man can impact the weather.

Every global warming scenario/prediction has been based on computer modeling, and we all know that if you feed the desired factors in, desired results come out.

Everyone knows temperature AND co2 levels were higher when man was still using campfires…and in a Carboniferous Period, when no trace of man was on the planet.

Beyond that though, America leads the developed nations in foreign aid, to nations that show no inclination of using democracy as a foundation for economic success.

Foreign aid, to nations that prefer the black market system to free-market systems.

Check the numbers…$38bn/year in foreign aid, much higher than any other nation.

Next time someone says ‘reparations’, tell them you gave…at the IRS.

Obama never complied with a mandate to make all aspects of the Iran deal known.

A Republican Senate can still stop Obama from giving Iran $150 billion in sanction relief, if they grow a backbone and declare him in non-compliance of the Corker bill.

Failure to do so makes Obama’s disastrous deal, along with sanction-relief, law.

What reasonable person gives $150 billion to the leading global terror state?

The GOP can stop this, but the question is…will they?

As Andrew McCarthy points out, the Senate can pass a failure-to-comply resolution nullifying the Corker bill, which then negates the statutory nature of sanction relief.

Not doing so would be problematic for Republicans.

Obama and Democrats can rightly argue there were mechanisms in place the GOP refused to use…if a gutless GOP Senate won’t take legitimate action to stop this…

…they own it.

Seems…odd…doesn’t it?

(UPDATED Sep 16) Empty air-conditioned tents in Saudi Arabia.

On Aug 27, BCP questioned if whitewash efforts were beginning, to cover Obama’s failure in the Middle East against ISIS and al-Qaeda terror groups.

Now comes word 50 analysts complain intel analysis has been skewed all along.

We nailed it two weeks BEFORE the confirmation broke.

If this despicable act doesn’t deserve articles of impeachment, nothing does.

Despite efforts to influence Americans on the immigration issue, latest polling finds that most mainstreet Americans (including Hispanics) want it leveled or reduced.

America accepts about 1 million immigrants, and 1 million migrant workers per year.

To that number, now add those who get in illegally…that’s a lot of people.

It doesn’t take a Nobel economist to understand what that does to our economy.

Whether the initial attacks in 2001, or Benghazi in 2012, remember Sept 11…

…by calling or emailing your congressional representatives.

(House of Representatives) (Senate)

Demand they stop Obama’s Iran deal.

Otherwise, sanctions relief scores Iran $150+ billion to continue terror acts.

As Hillary Clinton’s meltdown continues, Democrats nervously consider alternatives.

And the Democrat with the best chance to win in 2016…

…Donald Trump.

Okay, Republicans have (stupidly) allowed the Iran deal to be debated, despite the fact that it should not be in play, since Obama hasn’t provided details as required.

But at least Democrats have shown their true colors, by supporting Obama’s deal.

Now, the Republican Senators have to play hard ball, and invoke the nuclear option that allows a simple majority vote to establish this unlawful Democrat behavior.

Democrats used the nuclear option just to get Obama’s judges appointed.

You’d think America’s national security would justify the GOP invoking it now.

Message to McConnell & cohort…

…Man up, you gutless wonders.

Now they’ve done it. Al Qaeda’s magazine incites jihadists to kill Warren Buffett.

That’s the fastest way to a directed drone strike that anyone knows of…what are they thinking, provoking the guy who edits the U.S. military Hellfire-grams list?

Nobody messes with Obama’s billionaire sugar-homeys…