For 7 years of Obama’s reign, Democrats have blamed ‘W’ for the economy.

But during the Tuesday night debate, they let the cat out of the bag, admitting the subprime crisis that crashed our economy was caused by their actions.

Magic words? Glass-Steagall.

A law from the ’30s regulated banking, keeping commercial lending and securities ventures separate. Bill Clinton repealed it in ’99, setting the table for crisis since his Attorney General had pressured banks to make bad mortgage loans to minorities, in that they couldn’t require the level of collateral normally associated with such loans.

Unsecured loans of such magnitude created a huge financial risk for banks.

But, after repeal, when banks were allowed into the securities arena, they created shady investment packages that hid risky sub-prime mortgage loans within. Pushing the ‘securities’ off on other financial institutions offset the financial risk, but was akin to Typhoid Mary handing out granola bars at school lunch…all the ‘kids’ got sick.

(In other words…Wall Street crashed.)

At Tuesday’s debate (a little past halfway) O’Malley and Sanders directly connected that crash to the ’99 repeal of the law that would have prevented such disaster.

Now, the Democrat media is trying to stuff the manure back into the cow, but when you have Democrat presidential candidates admitting heretofore unspoken reality…

…that’s a lot of manure.

But just when you thought it couldn’t get any deeper, Hillary Clinton jumps in talking about how income inequality “hasn’t been this bad since the 1920s”…

…then just one sentence later making a totally contradictory comment that “…the economy does better when you have a Democrat in the White House.”

Does she think Americans are so stupid as to believe Obama’s a Republican?

Sure, gush over Hillary…but you lapdog media have a lot of glossing over ahead.

What honest Democrat gets elected if they admit poverty is a good thing?

Not many, right? But that’s what they need, to continue getting elected.

An IBD article notes that Census Data proves there’s a 98% chance of breaking out of poverty by doing three simple (but very impactful) things:

• graduate high school;
• work full-time;
• wait until 21 and get married before having kids.

We would add a fourth…don’t let the Democrats know that plan’s being followed.

(Because statistics reveal those escaping poverty shed the Democrat Party.)

Welfare destroys traditional family structure and creates single-parent households, in turn causing the stresses that result in high school drop-outs and teenage moms.

Proof? Look at 2-parent black family statistics before welfare’s creation in the ’60s.

Welfare? Democrats have taken ‘kill them with kindness’ to a whole new level.

Why do politicians need reminding? Lawbreakers don’t care about the law.

Until someone can explain a law that would have stopped Umpqua or Sandy Hook, any push for ‘gun control’ is better characterized as puerile political posturing…

…or veiling the real purpose – to remove ALL guns from civil society in America.

(And that means creating even more potential victims of gun violence…not less.)

Adam Lanza broke a dozen laws that day, before his mass-killing of schoolchildren.

Lawbreakers don’t care about the law.

Ironically, the Nation’s leading lawbreaker – Hillary Clinton – suggests otherwise.

Biden didn’t crash the debate, and by his absence, qualifies as the most honest, trustworthy member of the Democrats on the stage tonight.

SLAM…IT…HOME.

If honesty is important to the electorate, isn’t exposing dishonesty important?

Hillary’s sliding poll numbers reveal an informed electorate cares.

They care that she’s evaded responsibility, lied, and obstructed truth.

Don’t blame Republicans for exposing her dishonesty and obstructionism. Hillary Clinton has only herself to blame, for her acts AND her timing.

The House Select Committee started in 2014 after it was shown that information was being stonewalled, slow-walked, spirited away, or destroyed, since 2012.

Weekly revelations continue, right up to the present day. How is THAT the fault of a Congress that has the welfare of Americans as their sacred trust?

Those stonewalling have no credibility, when it’s their acts that delay the process.

Survival of the fittest? Not where Liberals are involved.

Another Columbus day, another mourning of the plague that is modern America.

‘Happy Indigenous Day?’

Hey, before the Indian moved in, buffalo ruled the Plains.

When will we be clamoring for ‘Happy Bison Day’?

CNN wants Biden at the Democrat debate so badly, they’ll hold a podium for him.

In Congress, the buffoon was on the wrong side of every issue.

Knowing Joe Biden, is an empty podium that much different than him being there?

Seriously, empty, occupied…would there be any difference?

Women make up 50%+ of voters. Who in their right mind believes a Republican is stupid enough to want to alienate that large a demographic of the electorate?

The only ones dumber than those who claim a GOP War-on-Women is raging…

…are those who believe it to be true.

But, if you look at the record number of jobless women because of Obama’nomics…

...it sure looks like a Democrat War-on-Women is raging.

Seems like lost in all the angst over Hillary’s exposure as a liar and obstructionist in ’emailgate’ is the fact an honest media should see exposing dishonesty as crucial.

Isn’t that a news media responsibility? We think so.

To the agenda-biased? Not so much…they attack honesty, to hide the dishonest.

But after all, why else term that journalism function a ‘Fourth Estate‘?

Obama was asked if he knew Hillary Clinton was using a private email account during her time as Secretary-of-State. And (of course) he lied and said ‘no’.

Anybody want to guess who her boss was, who she reported to during that period?

Anyone?

That’s right…the ‘SgtSchultz-in-Chief’ himself: Barack ‘I-know-nothing’ Obama.

Understand, the most vital aspect of State Dept diplomacy is communicating. How information crucial to that function is handled can make or break diplomatic efforts.

Which brings us to how we can state Obama’s lying when he says he didn’t know.

Classified info is, by its very nature, zealously guarded by intelligence agencies, including the CIA, NSA, DIA, FBI…you name the acronym – it’s what they do.

All of those agencies have vital roles…uncover information, and protect information.

Add in various DHS and DoD groups… all would have reported Hillary’s ‘mistake’.

All cabinet-level heads answer to him.

The president’s aides are integral to those efforts.

And, Obama gets a daily intel briefing.

That’s a lot of cooks in the kitchen. Obama knew. HE..HAD..TO..KNOW.

Does anyone in the sane world believe a rogue Secretary of State, who is routinely mishandling vital foreign and domestic intelligence, would have gone unreported?

The question remains…

…what’s worse – a lying president…or a media that covers for him?