Unrest within blacks and college youth is a stealth Democrat get-out-the-vote effort

Make no mistake, 2016 doesn’t look good for Obama-&-company. Their failed policies leave them nothing to brag about, from the economy to foreign policy.

So that means just one thing…time for some good old-fashioned class warfare.

Blacks and young people vote heavily Democrat…so who’s surprised that unrest is occurring within those demographics? They’ll just stoke the fires until Nov. 2016.

The only surprise at this point is that they haven’t got women worked up yet.

(But don’t be startled to see it ramp up soon.)

Killer EPA over-regulations

Sending the poor into deeper poverty is not the way to show you care.

Pandering to the green-energy billionaire investors, the EPA is forcing more low-cost energy providers to close down, ‘necessarily causing energy costs to skyrocket’.

A doctor explains how this causes serious harm for low-income households.

Based on the latest data, America’s environment doesn’t kill people…

…EPA over-regulation does.

Why don’t Muslim countries take in Muslim refugees?

Isn’t it odd that ‘Satan America’ is destination of choice for Muslim refugees?

Shouldn’t the nations of the ‘religion of peace’ be taking in their brethren?

It’s impossible to properly background-check such masses of refugees.

In light of that fact, and the obvious culture shock of transitioning, wouldn’t it be more humane for Muslim refugees to relocate to other Muslim nations?

When was the last time you let a total stranger into your house to roam around?

Does common sense even matter to Obama and his Democrat cohort?

Wouldn’t it be nice if they could at least LIE better?

Obama will cling to his ‘global warming is the crisis of our time’ mantra even as the death toll rises from the ISIS-driven terror strikes in Paris on Friday.

But his lie about the ‘97% consensus of scientists’ isn’t even a good fabrication.

As an NRO article points out, in the study Obama references…

  • the sample selected for the study was flawed;
  • the analysis of the sample was flawed;
  • the conclusion drawn from the analysis was flawed;
  • the reporting of the conclusion was flawed.

Shouldn’t America’s leader at least be a good liar?

Clearing up the lie about Cruz’s illegal immigration stand

A GOP candidate attacks Ted Cruz for his stance on granting illegals legal status.

What Cruz did with the amendment he proposed during the Senate amnesty fight stripped the ‘voting rights’ capability, the so-called ‘path-to-citizenship’ provision.

His plan was to expose Democrats as pushing amnesty just to gain voters.

He was very clear about his motives, predicting Democrats would not push amnesty if there were no voting-rights included in the legislation. And he was right.

To conflate that effort as a singular attempt to grant illegals a legal status is absurd.

The ‘gang-of-8’ proposal Cruz was trying to torpedo already did that.

This is not even a good attempt at disingenuous.

Marco Rubio should know better…it’s beneath him.