Quid pro…whatever sticks?

As editorialized on the pages of the New York Post: “Everyone who already thought the case for President Trump’s impeachment was a slam-dunk went berserk Thursday, claiming that acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney had just admitted to a quid pro quo with Ukraine.” 

“Except that what Mulvaney “admitted” is that the administration was doing what it should – pushing a foreign government to cooperate in getting to the bottom of foreign interference in the 2016 campaign.” (bold, underline emphasis added)

“Virtually every media outlet in America – certainly all those that jumped on Mulvaney’s remarks – has spent most of the last three years painting such foreign interference as the blackest possible crime. In fact, all Mulvaney did was repeat yet again that Trump ‘was worried about corruption with that nation’ – and specifically say those worries extended to cooperation in ‘the look-back to what happened in 2016.'”

Evidently, as we’ve seen over the last 2 years with collusion and election-meddling, we can add investigating corruption as not acceptable when the corrupt are Democrats.

Because…you know…quid-pro-something…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *