Schizophrenic argument proves abortion provider is guilty?

Planned Parenthood’s president claims no profit in selling baby parts.

(Profiting is illegal, you see.)

Organ-Harvester-in-Chief Cecile Richards also said abortion procedures weren’t changed to make the harvesting of those baby organs more successful.

(Adjusting the procedures is illegal, you see.)

She says longer version of the videos clearly show doctors saying they don’t profit.

But no matter what version, doctors in both clearly say procedures are changed.

So, she wants Americans to view the videos as proof PPH doesn’t profit…

…but ignore the same videos which prove procedures are illegally changed?

Talk about contradictory logic – is there a doubt of Dr. Baby Parts’s political party?

And, more importantly…is there any doubt as to Planned Parenthood’s guilt?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *