Defining cowardice, one racist Attorney General at a time

An earlier post defining AG Holder as a coward has prompted typical Liberal whining.

Simply put, Holder says opposition to Obama’s policies is racially motivated.

But, any honest person would recognize there will always be at least two views in a debate on issues, sometimes more; usually, each view has strong supporting points.

While there may be a scattered few who just don’t like the person or Party involved, their numbers are low – and proving such an allegation is difficult…if not impossible.

Then, there’s the question of why ‘dislike’ is present…is it because they’re a man, or a certain political party? Is it because he has an insulting smirk? Or he’s a certain race?

AG Holder doesn’t care – he simply paints opposition ‘racist’. Why?

Deceitfully playing the race card closes the door on honest debates he and Obama can’t afford to get into…because their issues are not supportable by the facts.

Case in point: during a Sunday news interview, he pulled ‘voter-ID-as racist’ out of the hat, claiming the need for such identification is meant to suppress the black vote…but that claim doesn’t even meet the laugh test, on several different levels.

  • Anyone entering Justice Department buildings is required to have photo ID; is Attorney General Holder racist, denying minority blacks the right to Justice?
  • Studies reveal voter photo-ID requirements result in more blacks voting!

Holder knows this!

And that’s why the COWARD needs to play the race card.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *