Misconstruing law to falsely exonerate Hillary does not justify exoneration

Crazies in the Democrat Party are welded to Hillary Clinton no matter what.

Nothing demonstrates it like the criminality she exhibited during her Secretary of State stint under Barack Obama, when she intentionally set up a private email server, and her actions after that service when demanded to turn over data several years later.

Did we mention her private server wasn’t ‘accidentally’ set up – it was intentional?

As everyone knows, Obama publicly came to her defense, stating she didn’t intend to break any laws; months later then-FBI Dir Comey stated she shouldn’t be prosecuted…

…because there was no intent to break laws.

What a crock…

The federal laws she violated don’t require provable intent…but, even if they did

  1. choosing to set up a private email server to evade oversight would be the very definition of ‘INTENT’;
  2. choosing to destroy or have data under subpoena destroyed is INTENT;
  3. choosing not to capture and preserve documents is INTENT;
  4. choosing to make false statements to Congress is INTENT;
  5. choosing to remove data without authority is INTENT;
  6. choosing to act in concert with others to commit acts is INTENT.

That said, here are the laws that Hillary Clinton violated, intentionally or otherwise:

  • Federal Records Act – created & obtained records during employment must be captured and preserved by employee agency (violated that law daily, for 4 years);
  • 18 U.S.C. 641 – stealing government documents;
  • 18 U.S.C. 2071 (b) – concealed, removed, obliterated, destroyed records;
  • 18 U.S.C. 1001 – making materially false statements to Congress;
  • 18 U.S.C. 1505 & 1515(b) – obstructed justice, and acted corruptly to withhold, conceal, destroy documents/information in a congressional investigation;
  • 18 U.S.C. 793 (d) (e) & (f) – willful and deliberate retention of classified documents and permitted them removed, or illegally moved them, from their proper place;
  • 18 U.S.C. 1924(a) – knowingly removed documents or materials without authority and with intent to retain at an unauthorized location;
  • 18 U.S.C. 286 & 371 – multiple conspiracy counts of acting in concert with others.

Anyone who wants further clarification of laws can use the links provided or read Gregg Jarrett’s ‘The Russia Hoax’…in which he lays out in detail her acts violating said laws, and provided the basis for this post, in our hope honest doubters will see the truth.

Every one of those laws are provable, with plenty of evidence to support the proof.

We challenge Hillary supporters to prove otherwise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *