Reader Carlos G. protests that Obama’s hands were tied by international protocol, that violating a sovereign nation’s airspace was not a viable option.

Really? Deploying killer drones over other sovereign nations is no big deal…?

So Obama violating Pakistan’s airspace to kill Osama bin Laden is okay, but violating Libyan airspace to protect Americans being attacked is wrong?

Please…

For those so desperate to protect Clinton and Obama, could you AT LEAST bring out 1 legitimate argument in their defense?

Spec-Ops personnel dropped in right next to a Pakistani military training center, in order to double-tap bin Laden (and everyone else in his compound, come to that).

Dozens (if not hundreds) of arguably innocent civilians are collateral damage every day a suspected terrorist driving by them in a BMW is drone-killed with Hellfire missiles.

And some would have us believe ‘honoring airspace’ justified letting Americans die…?