To the extent that special counsel Mueller is investigating obstruction/collusion/leak acts during and after the election, it’s an honest question to ask if he’ll include…Democrats.

After all, his buddy (former FBI director Comey) implicated Democrats during his Senate testimony, when he stated Obama’s Attorney General pushed her narrative on him.

She ordered him to refer to the ‘matter’ of then-candidate Hillary Clinton’s email imbroglio, rather than as what it was – an investigation – to give Clinton cover during her campaign.

That, my friends, was ‘obstruction’…

…unlike the talk President Trump had with Comey in February, where he ‘hoped (Comey) could see his way clear’ to leave Flynn alone, after learning Flynn did nothing wrong.

That wasn’t obstruction: 1) it was NOT an order, and 2) even if it was worded as an order, as President he has the legal authority to end any investigation, not to mention that…

…3) to prove obstruction requires proving corruption – to establish that means an official must know their order is against the law, but as shown in 2) above, it’s lawful to do so…

…for a President.

For a great article on this, see Andrew McCarthy’s latest op-ed at NRO.

Now let’s talk about collusion, where, for a year now no evidence has been produced that shows Trump or his campaign colluded with Russia, but it begs a larger question…

Why isn’t there any talk about back-channel and open talks with Russia by Democrats?

We know, we have proof, of Clinton campaign chairman Podesta’s engaging with them, as well as other Democrats, yet, typically, sham-stream media focus is centered…

…against Republicans and Trump, where no proof exists.

Finally, about the leaks that have actually caused the most damage in this mess – damage to America’s global credibility – a primary self-confessed leaker has been found.

Former FBI director James Comey…

…you know…the guy everyone was trusting to conduct an ‘impartial’ investigation.

And, oh yeah…a very good friend of Mueller’s for over 15 years now.

President Trump has the right to replace the compromised and conflicted Mueller with another special counsel…someone who might be more willing to probe EVERYONE.

Failing that, and absent a thorough investigation, this Mueller scenario is a farce.

Hey…it was a counter-intelligence investigation to start with. The ‘special counsel’ rule is for criminal investigations. But if they bend rules, the least they can do is acknowledge…

…that leaking intelligence is a bad thing…right, Mr. Comey?

So, to the extent that Russia-collusion and intelligence-agency leaking is cause for wide investigation, it should involve BOTH Republican and Democrat campaign groups…

…and if you want to talk presidential obstruction and/or meddling (as it pertains to how the pre-election campaigns were conducted), let’s look at Barack Obama too.