Whether there were classified emails on Clinton’s private server notwithstanding, once legal proceedings of any type occur, she’s obliged to preserve evidence.

Claiming her innocence, then wiping clean a server that would prove it? Who in their right mind believes anyone would deliberately destroy supporting evidence?

No one…other than rabid ‘Democrat-at-all-cost’ Clintonistas.

Spoliation of evidence…look it up. It’s the “…intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, or destroying of evidence…relevant to an ongoing or reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding.”

Explain how one can dodge a ‘reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding’ provision, when several years of congressional hearings have been conducted?

Explain how one can believe Hillary would destroy evidence supporting her?

(Though, achieving that, one must know supporting evidence is still…evidence.)

By all means…cue the ‘spoliation-deniers’…

…Rush Limbaugh can always use more comedy for his talk-show.