Previous posts noted that hysteria over the Michael Brown shooting was intentional.
The fabricated outrage, and character assassination of the police officer involved, was a deliberate construct meant to stir up white-v-black anger, and get out the black vote.
Now, none other than the ultra-liberal NY Times confirms that reality.
The real irony? The article wasted no time noting Ferguson is a 67% black community, “but has mostly white elected leaders”, implying a ‘city official white bias’, of course…
…but then, inexplicably, noted a low 12% voter turnout in the last town election.
So, contrived anger by the black community needs to be directed…at themselves?
An oversize teenager breaks the law; defies the law; attacks the law; and gets killed.
Then, the race-baiters step in, gen up anger against white elected officials and police, in a community where 67% of its citizens are black and got exactly what they voted for…
…and somehow this is a white-on-black hate crime that needs to stir up the black vote?