At the American Thinker: “Now that the transcripts of the hearings are out there for all to read, we all know that these hearings did not produce a single witness who had knowledge of any evidence that candidate or President Trump had colluded with Russia.  Not one.  Not James Clapper, not Susan Rice, not one of them who for three years have been accusing Trump of treason had a bit of evidence, heard or seen, that could bolster their talking points.  Some of them, like former Department of Defense official Evelyn Farkas and the vainglorious and pompous Col. Alexander Vindman, admitted they had lied, either on the networks or, in Vindman’s case, about Trump’s words during his phone conversation with Ukraine’s President Volodomyr Zelensky.”

“We also know now that Schiff knew just days after the “Trump Tower meeting,” which Donald, Jr. had attended, that Trump was thoroughly innocent; a translator testified that not a word about “dirt on Hillary” was mentioned.  Yet Schiff flogged that horse for years.  His contention that there was something sinister about that meeting on the Trump side of things, was just another big Schiff lie.  Not that he lacks many partners in the crime to destroy Donald Trump — Brennan, Comey, Clapper, McCabe, et al.  But it is Schiff who has been the crazed, bug-eyed face of the Democrats’ attempt at impeachment ever since.” (ed. note: bold and underline emphasis added)

Now, understand this…

Every one of those mentioned took an oath of office before serving; every one swearing to ‘Support and defend the Constitution…against all enemies, foreign and Domestic.’

Not one iota of evidence…but that didn’t stop them from violating their oath.

Impeachable offenses, you sack-of-Schiff?

Indeed.