Wu-Flu ‘probables’ paradox: any death counts…but uncounted cases DON’T

Why is it probable (read, ‘untested’) deaths are immediately attributed to Wu-Flu, but probable (see, Stanford, USC, Harvard links) unreported asymptomatic cases aren’t?

Who can explain why all ‘probable’ data that enables widespread panic and acceptance of loss on individual liberty is okay to cite…but not any data that reduces hysteria?

Until someone comes up with a logical answer, it’s strictly politics…of control.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *