While the DC chattering class warns impeachment is not an option, consider…

If Congress fails to check Obama’s trampling of the Rule of Law, he has every right to interpret that as condoning of such activities…and sees no reason to curtail them.

Silence implies consent.

The House has two controls in our checks-&-balances system…

1) cutting back on funding (where ‘Obama-overreach’ occurs);

2) impeachment.

Cutting funding provides Democrats with a ‘government shutdown’ blame-game, and, when aided by a duplicitous media, manages to foment anti-GOP sentiment.

Impeachment carries with it a certain ‘racial’ hysteria, and the usual lap-dog media will carry that water for Democrats enthusiastically, energetically, and endlessly.

But the alternative is… Silence Implies Consent (and invites more of the same).

An earlier blog noted that impeachment doesn’t necessitate ‘removal from office’. We Americans are fair-minded, and sentiment is growing against government overreach.

Americans also (finally) recognize they were subjected to a slew of Obamacare lies. They see the overreach, and don’t like the way this administration is operating.

Impeachment as a due process ensures the Rule of Law is honored. Those involved get their day in court, and have an opportunity to defend their actions, if they can.

GOP leaders must choose their path, or understand inaction begets more tyranny.

In the presence of Executive lawlessness, doing nothing may be politically expedient…

…but it’s morally, legally, (and Constitutionally) wrong.

Members of Congress swear to ‘support and defend’ the Constitution.

Inaction when its being trampled violates that oath.